Difference between revisions of "Talk:Indigenous Families"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
(A few substantive changes and comments on terminology)
 
m (Changes in this section)
Line 1: Line 1:
−
Hi JP
+
Hi JP and Nate
  
−
I have made some substantive changes here to make things simpler for the reader.
+
I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.
  
−
1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction etc etc.
+
1. '''In the introduction''', I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . .
  
−
2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple.  
+
2. '''In the information about paying child support''', I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)
  
 
3. '''Language''': I use Aboriginal (capitalized) in the standard way (to include "Indians" Inuit and Metis) - but use First Nations rather than "Indians."  I refer to "heritage" rather than "roots." I do not use "native."
 
3. '''Language''': I use Aboriginal (capitalized) in the standard way (to include "Indians" Inuit and Metis) - but use First Nations rather than "Indians."  I refer to "heritage" rather than "roots." I do not use "native."
  
−
4. Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I have added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''."  (If a reader needs help with on- and off-reserve issues and was phoning Lawyer Referral, it would be helpful. . .) See what you think.
+
4. Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer''', I added "'''who has expertise in Aboriginal law'''."  (If a reader needed help with on- and off-reserve issues and was phoning Lawyer Referral, that could be helpful. . .) '''See what you think.'''
 +
 
 +
5. In '''Resources and links''' I removed Native Community Law Offices (gone, alas, alas, and grievously missed) and put in the current LSS services. I took out Native Friendship Centre suggestion because Clicklaw seems to offer only one - in Quesnel.

Revision as of 04:34, 22 April 2013

Hi JP and Nate

I have made some substantive changes here you will want to check.

1. In the introduction, I just refer to the Indian Act, rather than talking about the federal government's exclusive jurisdiction over Indians and land reserved for Indians . . .

2. In the information about paying child support, I changed the first couple of sentences to make it more simple. (I also put in some para breaks.)

3. Language: I use Aboriginal (capitalized) in the standard way (to include "Indians" Inuit and Metis) - but use First Nations rather than "Indians." I refer to "heritage" rather than "roots." I do not use "native."

4. Where the text recommends that readers get the "advice of a family law lawyer, I added "who has expertise in Aboriginal law." (If a reader needed help with on- and off-reserve issues and was phoning Lawyer Referral, that could be helpful. . .) See what you think.

5. In Resources and links I removed Native Community Law Offices (gone, alas, alas, and grievously missed) and put in the current LSS services. I took out Native Friendship Centre suggestion because Clicklaw seems to offer only one - in Quesnel.

You probably seeing this word used in terms like substantive law, substantive issues, or substantive orders, and it is used to identify aspects of these things (be they laws, legal issues, or court orders) that deal with the legal rights and duties of the parties involved in a case. Substantive law defines and regulates the rights and obligations of individuals, as opposed to procedural law, which outlines the methods and means by which substantive law is made and administered. In family law, substantive issues often involve matters such as guardianship and parenting arrangements relating to children, support, and the division of property. A substantive order from a judge will be a decision about a substantive issue, versus a procedural order which will be about how steps in the litigation should.

With respect to courts, (1) the authority of the court to hear an action and make orders, (2) the limits of the authority of a particular judicial official, (3) the geographic location of a court, or (4) the territorial limits of a court's authority. With respect to governments, (5) the authority of a government to make legislation as determined by the constitution, or (6) the limits of authority of a particular government agency. See “constitution."

Real property; a parcel of real property and the buildings upon it. See also "chattel," "ownership" and "possession."

Money paid by one parent or guardian to another parent or guardian as a contribution toward the cost of a child's living and other expenses.

A person licensed to practice law in a particular jurisdiction by that jurisdiction's law society. See "barrister and solicitor."

Retrieved from "https://stagewiki.clicklaw.bc.ca/index.php?title=Talk:Indigenous_Families&oldid=10105"
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Site
Tools
Contributors
Print/export