Difference between pages "Family Violence" and "ICBC and Compulsory Coverage (12:X)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
(Difference between pages)
Jump to navigation Jump to search
 
 
Line 1: Line 1:
{{JP Boyd on Family Law TOC|expanded = violence}}{{JPBOFL Editor Badge
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 12, 2020}}
|ChapterEditors = [[Gayle Raphanel]] and [[Samantha Simpson]]
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = ICBC}}
}}
{{LSLAP 12 Old System Notice}}
{{Clicklawbadge
|resourcetype = critical resources and <br/> common questions on
|link = [https://www.clicklaw.bc.ca/global/search?f=Abuse+%26+family+violence family violence issues]
}}


==Introduction==
ICBC is the sole provider of basic insurance for non-exempt vehicles in BC. Exempt vehicles are described in sections 43–44 of the ''IVA'' and also in section 2 of the ''IVR''.  For most vehicles owned, leased or operated in BC, third-party liability coverage up to $200,000 is only available from ICBC.  Full coverage for exempt vehicles, extended coverage in excess of the basic coverage (third party liability insurance over $200,000, ''IVR'', s 67), and collision (“own damage”) insurance may be purchased from either ICBC or from private insurers. See [[Optional ICBC Insurance (12:XI)|Section XI: Optional Insurance]], below. Note that private insurers may have their own requirement for coverage that may be above and beyond the requirements of ICBC
In times gone by, domestic violence was often swept under the rug. Increasingly, our legal system not only seeks to address the harms that flow from such violence but also encourages legal professionals to be proactive in assessing the potential for it.
The ''[[Family Law Act]]'' requires all family dispute resolution professionals (which includes, family justice counselors, parenting coordinators, lawyers, mediators and arbitrators) to watch out for warning signs of family violence in relationships. These professionals assess whether family violence might be present, and if it appears to be, to assess the extent to which the family violence may adversely affect:


* the safety of the party or a family member of that party, and
Vehicles licensed in BC are required by law to carry basic compulsory coverage, which is evidenced by a certificate of automobile insurance issued under the ''IVA'' to someone licensed under the ''MVA'' (i.e. the “insured”).  
* the ability of the party to negotiate a fair agreement.  


Family violence includes physical abuse, but also non-physical forms of abuse. Section 1 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' defines the term:
'''NOTE''': The definition of “the insured” varies somewhat from section to section in the ''IVA'' and ''IVR''.


<blockquote><tt>"family violence" includes</tt></blockquote>
Driving while uninsured is an offence (''MVA'', s 24(3)(a)) which carries a maximum penalty of a fine of up to $250 and/or imprisonment of up to three months (''MVA'', s 24(5)(a)). Driving an uninsured vehicle is also an offence (''MVA'', s 24(3)(b)) which carries a fine of at least $300 and no more than $2,000 and/or imprisonment for at least seven days and no more than six months (''MVA'', s 24(5)(b)).
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(a) physical abuse of a family member, including forced confinement or deprivation of the necessities of life, but not including the use of reasonable force to protect oneself or others from harm,</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) sexual abuse of a family member,</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(c) attempts to physically or sexually abuse a family member,</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(d) psychological or emotional abuse of a family member, including</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(i) intimidation, harassment, coercion or threats, including threats respecting other persons, pets or property,</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(ii) unreasonable restrictions on, or prevention of, a family member's financial or personal autonomy,</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(iii) stalking or following of the family member, and</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(iv) intentional damage to property, and</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(e) in the case of a child, direct or indirect exposure to family violence</tt></blockquote></blockquote>


So far, the courts have ruled that a broad range of actions constitute ''family violence''.  The following are just some examples of family violence: 
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/fxjb5 B. (M.W.) v. B. (A.R.)]'', 2013 BCSC 885, a mother was found to have committed family violence for repeatedly interfering with the father’s access to the children and refusing to settle orders that were drafted by lawyers and these actions prolonged and intensified the litigation.
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/gdt2h Hokhold v. Gerbrandt]'', 2014 BCSC 1875, the Court determined that the father's actions which included sending demanding emails to the mother, failing to pay support, and threatening to close his dental practice, constituted family violence.
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/gh679 R. (C.) v. (M.A.)]'', 2015 BCPC 76 the Court found that a father’s threats to use his stronger financial position to fight the mother “[until] she lives in a box” constituted family violence.
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/g7233 R. (L.A.) v. R. (E.J.)]'', 2014 BCSC 966, the Court found that disparaging remarks made to the children about their mother, as well as disparaging comments made to the mother in the children’s presence, constituted emotional abuse.
* ''[http://canlii.ca/t/glx9n F.(C.) v. V. (D)]'', 2015 BCPC 309, the Court found that there had been family violence as the father broke the mother’s cellphone and a picture on the wall, then kicked a hole in the bathroom door.


A lot depends on the specific facts of the case, however. The following are some examples of where the court determined that there was no family violence:
== A. Scope of Coverage ==


* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/g2zjp S. (L.) v. S. (G).]'', 2014 BCSC 187, the father wanted the Court to declare that the mother’s denial of parenting time constituted family violence. The Court refused. The Court noted that the father failed to provide any evidence of harm to the children.
Subject to various limitations and exclusions, basic compulsory coverage is set out in the ''IVR'' and provides the insured with:
*indemnity for third party legal liability (Part 6);
*accident benefits; no-fault benefits payable for death or injury (Part 7);
*coverage for damages caused by uninsured or unidentified motorists (Part 8);
*first party coverage (Part 10). This includes:
<blockquote>
*inverse liability (Division 1 of Part 10); and
*underinsured motorist protection (UMP) (Division 2 of Part 10).</blockquote>


* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/g1rsc E. (J.R.) v. 07----8 B.C. Ltd.]'', 2013 BCSC 2038 the Court held that taking an insistent and even inflexible position in post-separation negotiations did not in that case equate to emotional or psychological abuse.
== B. Third Party Legal Liability: Part 6 of the IVR ==


Some relationships are scarred by violence and abuse, sometimes toward a spouse and sometimes toward a child. Where domestic violence exists, both family law and criminal law can be involved. It may also mean that a ''[[Form F3 Notice of Family Claim|Notice of Family Claim]]'' could include a claim for payment of damages resulting from the violence.
=== 1. Indemnity ===


This chapter provides an introduction to the differences between criminal law and tort law, the law about personal injuries. It reviews the ways that criminal law, tort law, and the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' can address issues of family violence, including through peace bonds and protection orders. It also takes a <span class="noglossary">brief</span> look at some child protection issues.
This insurance indemnifies the insured against liability imposed on the insured by law for the injury or death of another, and/or loss or damage to another’s property, to a total limit of $200,000 (''IVR'', s 67), to be shared among the victims of a motor vehicle accident (Schedule 3, s 1). The base limit of liability is $500,000 in claims made for a bus, and $300,000 in claims made for a taxi or limousine. Extended Third-Party Legal Liability coverage may be purchased at the insured’s discretion. ([[Optional ICBC Insurance (12:XI)|See Section XI: Optional Insurance,]] below). '''If the insured is found legally liable, and no extended coverage has been purchased, he or she is responsible for payment of any claims in excess of the above limits.'''


Two of the most important branches of the law are ''criminal law'' and ''civil law''; there are plenty of others, like constitutional law and administrative law, but these are two of the big ones.  
As of September 16, 2019, ICBC introduced a new insurance category (blanket insurance certificate) for transportation network services (TNS) or ride-hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft. The blanket basic coverage provides coverage up to $1,000,000 third party liability when the vehicle is a) hailed by passengers through the online platform and b) is operated to transport the passengers (''IVR'', s 154). This blanket coverage is not for individual drivers and it is mandatory for ride-hailing companies.


Criminal law deals with a person's offences against the rules of the state. Civil law, on the other hand, in particular that branch of civil law called "tort law" (the word "tort" comes from the Latin word for "wrong"), deals with a person's offences against other people, such as personal injuries, motor vehicle accidents, negligence, assault and battery, trespass, and so forth.  
=== 2. Who is Covered ===


The legal definition of a tort is "a breach of a duty owed by someone to someone else which gives rise to a cause of action," like a duty not to hit someone, a duty to drive carefully, or a duty not to dig a hole in your lawn that someone might fall into. Generally speaking, these sort of civil offences aren't set out in laws the way that the rules against robbery or assault are set out in the ''Criminal Code''; they're creatures of the common law, the law that the courts have created.
The definitions of “insured” for this part of the ''IVR'' may be found in ''IVR'', s 63. For our purposes, the most relevant definitions of “insured” are:
<blockquote> a) a person named in an owner’s certificate; or
b) an individual who operates the vehicle described in the owner’s certificate with the consent of the owner; or  
c) an individual who operates the vehicle described in the owner’s certificate while being a member of the owner’s household.


That explanation of the difference between criminal law and civil law was a bit technical. Another way of looking at it is through the example of O.J. Simpson. If you recall, O.J. was tried twice for the same basic issue. First, he was criminally tried for an alleged murder. Second, the family of the victim sued him in civil court for the alleged wrongful death of the victim.
d) where the owner is not an individual,
<blockquote>(i) an officer, employee or partner of the owner for whose regular use the vehicle described in the owner's certificate is provided, or (ii) a member of the household of an officer, employee or partner of the owner, who, with the consent of the owner, uses or operates the vehicle described in the owner's certificate.</blockquote> </blockquote>


Essentially, the criminal trial was because of O.J.'s alleged crime of killing someone contrary to the criminal law (a crime against the state) and the civil trial was because of his alleged tort offence against the family of the victim (a wrong against the family). The important point here is that the one thing O.J. was alleged to have done gave rise to both the criminal charges and the family's tort claim: two separate court proceedings, one in criminal court and one in civil court.
=== 3. Extension of Indemnity ===


If you are punched by someone, for example, that person's conduct may result in both:
According to ''IVR'', s 65, indemnity is extended to an insured who operates a motor vehicle not described in an owner’s certificate issued to the insured (i.e. someone else’s car).
For the purposes of s 65 only, “insured” includes the following:
<blockquote> a) a person named as an owner in an owner’s certificate;
b) a member of the owner’s household;


#a criminal prosecution, for a breach of the criminal law that makes it an offence to intentionally cause an injury to someone else, and
c) an employee or partner of the owner, where their regular use of the vehicle described in the owner’s certificate is provided for; and
#a civil court proceeding, for a breach of the civil duty not to harm someone else, which may give you a cause of action in tort and allow you to sue the person who hit you for damages.
d) the spouse of an employee or partner described in paragraph (c) where the spouse resides with the employee or partner.</blockquote>


Possible punishments for someone found criminally guilty include:
Note that, absent this expanded definition, “insured” would not otherwise cover a member of the insured’s household operating a vehicle not described in an owner’s certificate issued to the insured.


* fines,  
As of September 1, 2019, ICBC requires drivers to list out all the household members who may drive their vehicles, regardless of the number of times they may drive it. In addition, non-household members such as employees who may be driving the insured’s vehicle for more than 12 times a year will also be required to be listed at the time of purchasing the policy. The additional members listed will be factored into the calculation for the premium paid.
* a jail sentence,  
* both a fine and a jail sentence, or
* imposed terms or conditions, like a restraining order or a peace bond.


In contrast, the goal of civil law is compensation for the victim more so than punishment of the offender. Compensation is for the harm they suffered. Normally, this takes the form of ''damages'', a financial award intended to compensate for things like pain and suffering, lost wages, rehabilitation and medical expenses, and so forth. Damages are an attempt to provide monetary compensation for the harm suffered as a result of the wrongful act.
See https://www.icbc.com/insurance/costs/drivers-experience-crash-history/Pages/Default.aspx.


==The ''Criminal Code''==
If a household member or non-household member, who was not listed on the principal’s policy, gets involved in an accident, ICBC will have the right to impose a financial penalty on the principal’s policy and the principal may also be subjected to a higher premium rate when renewing the policy in the future.


The ''Criminal Code'' is the main federal legislation on criminal law. The ''Criminal Code'' does not specifically address family violence, but there are a number of possible criminal offences that could apply where there has been family violence, including:
=== 4. Restrictions on Indemnity ===


*common assault,
Section 65(2) of the ''IVR'' states that if an insured is operating a motor vehicle that is not described in an owner’s certificate issued to him or her, indemnity is not extended to the insured if:
*assault causing bodily harm,
*the insured is operating the motor vehicle in connection with the business of a garage service operator;
*aggravated assault,
*the motor vehicle is owned or regularly operated by the insured;
*sexual assault,
*the motor vehicle is used for carrying passengers for compensation or hire or for commercial use;
*attempted murder,
<blockquote> *In respect of a TNS-only vehicle operated under a transportation network services authorization, this corporation's exemption applies only if injury or death of another, or loss or damage to property of another, arises out of the operation of the TNS-only vehicle when
*stalking (criminal harassment),
<blockquote> (a) the vehicle has been hailed by or for passengers through the use of the online platform to which the transportation network services authorization relates, and
*making threats (uttering threats),
(b) the insured is operating the vehicle for the purposes of picking up, transporting or dropping off those passengers. </blockquote> </blockquote>
*keeping someone against their will (unlawful confinement), and
*the motor vehicle is in fact not licensed under the MVA (or similar legislation) and the insured does not have reasonable grounds to believe the motor vehicle is licensed; or
*kidnapping.
*the insured is operating the vehicle without the consent of the owner and does not have reasonable grounds to believe that he has the consent of the owner.  


In <span class="noglossary">order</span> for any of these charges to be laid, a complaint must be made to the police. Normally, this takes the form of an emergency 9-1-1 call. The police will come to your home and interview you and anyone else who witnessed the event.
Section 77 provides, in part, that an owner seeking to rely on the coverage provided for a vehicle not named in the owner’s certificate cannot do so if he or she also owns (or leases) the non-described vehicle that has been involved in the accident (i.e. you cannot just insure one vehicle and expect this to cover all of the other vehicles in your fleet).


After the police have conducted their investigation, the lead officer prepares a document called a ''Report to Crown Counsel'' and sends it to crown counsel, which is the lawyer for the government. Among other things, the Report to Crown Counsel describes witnesses' statements and recommends if charges should be laid. Crown counsel then decides whether there is enough evidence to lay charges. If they think there is enough evidence, crown counsel will approve the charges and the matter will be set for a hearing before a judge.
Neither garage service operators nor their employees are covered by the owner’s certificate issued for customers’ vehicles while the vehicle is in the care, custody, or control of the garage service operator or his or her employee for a purpose relating to the business. “Garage service operator” is defined in Part 1 of the ''IVR'' as “the operator of a motor vehicle service facility and includes a dealer, service station operator, motor vehicle repairman, auto body shop repairman, wrecker operator, and the operator of a vehicle parking or storage facility” (s 57). To offset the effect of s 57, the garage service operator must obtain special coverage pursuant to s 150.


===Information for abused persons===
=== 5. What is Covered ===


If you have suffered family violence, call the police; nothing will happen until you do. If there is evidence of abuse, the police can arrest your partner and may take them into <span class="noglossary">custody</span>. To find out more about what the police can do, you may wish to read [http://clicklaw.bc.ca/resource/2412 Getting Help from the Police or RCMP] and
In addition to the legal liability coverage (i.e. s 65 indemnification) outlined above, ''IVR'' ss 67 and 69 states that ICBC may also pay for:
[http://clicklaw.bc.ca/resource/2237 Surviving Relationship Violence and Abuse]. If your partner is taken into <span class="noglossary">custody</span>, they will stay there until a judge is able to speak to them. Most of the time, your partner will be released from <span class="noglossary">custody</span> until the trial date following the <span class="noglossary">brief</span> hearing, and the <span class="noglossary">release</span> will be on specific terms and conditions set out in a document called a ''Recognizance'' or an ''Undertaking''.
<blockquote> a) “reasonable” emergency medical aid, so long as reimbursement is not provided to the insured by another insurer or under another Part;
b) emergency equipment or supplies provided to the insured (i.e. fire extinguishers, jacks or other necessary emergency equipment or supplies);


It's important that you call the police right away, or at least fairly soon after the violence. The police will sometimes refuse to take <span class="noglossary">action</span> against your partner on the ground that the complaint was made out of malice or a desire for revenge because of the breakdown of the relationship.
c) all or some (depending upon the circumstances) of the costs taxed against the insured in an action, in accordance with ''the Supreme Court Civil Rules'', BC Reg 56/2019 for aggregated general and specific damages; and
d) the pre-judgment interest under the ''Court Order Interest Act'', RSBC 1996, c 79 or analogous legislation of another jurisdiction on that part of the judgment, and pay post-judgment interest under the Interest Act, RSC 1985, c I-15 or analogous legislation of another jurisdiction on that part of the judgment, both within the limits set out in s 1 of Schedule 3 (''IVR''). </blockquote>


You should tell the police — and perhaps crown counsel — about all of your concerns with your partner, whether they're about yourself or your children. You should also tell the police about past incidents of family violence, and whether your partner has ever been arrested for similar problems in the past. If your partner is taken into <span class="noglossary">custody</span>, you will want your concerns addressed in the recognizance on which your partner will be released. Among other things, the court can require that your partner:
=== 6. What is Not Covered ===


*not go to your home, school or workplace,
ICBC will ''not'' indemnify an insured for certain types of damage, including:
*not go to your children's school or daycare,
*loss or damage to property carried in or on a vehicle owned, rented or in the care, custody or control of an insured (s 72.1); or
*not come within a certain distance of your home,
*liability directly or indirectly arising out of the operation of attached equipment (i.e. machinery or equipment that is mounted on or attached to the vehicle, and which is not required for the safe operation of that vehicle) at a site where such equipment is operated, unless the attached equipment is used in accordance with the ''IVR'' (s 72(2)); or
*not <span class="noglossary">contact</span> you or the children, directly or indirectly, and
*under Part 4, 6, 7, or 10 in respect of injury, death, loss or damage arising out of radioactive, toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of prescribed substances under the ''Atomic Energy Contract Act'' (''IVR'', s 56(1)(a)); or
*fulfill any other condition that may be necessary for the safety of you and your children.
*under ''IVA'', ss 20 (uninsured vehicles) or 24 (hit and run accidents), under IVR, s 49.3 (default of premiums); or
*under Part 7 or Part 10 of the ''IVR'' in respect of any injury, death, loss or damage arising, directly or indirectly out of a declared or undeclared war or insurrection, rebellion or revolution (''IVR'', s 56(1)(b)); or
*under ''IVA'', ss 20 or s 24, under ''IVR'', ss 49 or 49.3(1)(b), Part 6 or Part 10 in respect of punitive or exemplary damages or other similar non-compensatory damages (''IVR'', s 56(1)(c)); or
*a general or special assessment, penalty or premium, payable under the ''Workers’ Compensation Act'' (British Columbia) or similar Act (''IVR'', s 72.1(1)(a)).


Finally, ask that the police and crown counsel keep you up to speed on the progress of the criminal case; you should also ask for a copy of your statement and the recognizance that your partner is released on.
=== 7. Duties of the Insured ===


====Breaching the recognizance====
An insured has a duty to report to ICBC mid-term changes, as required by s 9 of the ''IVR''. These changes may result in an increase or decrease in the premiums paid to ICBC. The insured named in the owner’s certificate is obligated to report to an ICBC agent the following:


If your partner doesn't follow the terms of their recognizance or undertaking, call the police. They won't be aware that there's a further problem unless you let them know.
<blockquote> a) any change in the insured’s address within 10 days '''after''' the change;
b) any acquisition of a substitute vehicle for the vehicle described in the certificate within 10 days '''after''' the acquisition;


====Call VictimLink====
c) any anticipated change in the use of the vehicle described in the certificate to a use to which a different insurance rate applies '''before''' such a change;
d) any anticipated change in the territory in which the vehicle described in the certificate is principally used '''before''' such a change; and/or
e) any change in the location of where the insured vehicle is primarily located when not in use, within 30 days of the change, '''if''' the premium for the vehicle is established on the basis of this location, '''unless''' the vehicle is used for vacation purposes. </blockquote>


Sometimes calling the police isn't enough. Sometimes you may need counselling to help you cope with the violence, and, in particularly bad situations, you may need a safe place to stay with your children until the criminal proceeding can be dealt with.
Furthermore, ICBC is not liable to indemnify an insured who, to the prejudice of ICBC, fails to comply with duties outlined in s 73 of the ''IVR''. This section states that an insured:


Call [http://www.clicklaw.bc.ca/helpmap/service/1055 VictimLink BC] at 1-800-563-0808 for assistance. VictimLink BC is a province-wide telephone help line for victims of family violence, and all other crimes. At VictimLink BC a support worker can provide information and referrals to help you deal with the effects of family violence, and arrange for crisis support counselling. VictimLink BC is available free to people across BC and Yukon 24 hours a day, seven days a week.
<blockquote> a) must promptly give ICBC written notice of any claim made for the accident, including any other insurance held by him or her providing coverage for the accident;
b) must help secure evidence and information and the attendance of any witnesses;


You may feel that you need to leave the family home, or you may want to develop a safety plan in case your partner becomes violent again. A victim support worker can help you develop a safety plan or find a place to stay. Again, call VictimLink BC and ask to speak with a victim support worker.
c) must cooperate with ICBC in the defence of any action or proceeding, or appeal, taken by ICBC on behalf of the insured;


====Getting back together====
d) must allow ICBC to inspect an insured vehicle at any reasonable time;


You must speak to crown counsel if you want to get back together with your partner, or if you want to <span class="noglossary">contact</span> them, or stop the criminal process. You cannot change the terms of your partner's recognizance or drop the charges yourself. Only crown counsel can do that. If you <span class="noglossary">contact</span> your partner, you could be making matters worse since you'll be inviting them to break the terms of the recognizance, which might result in further criminal charges against them.
e) must, on receipt of a claim, legal document or correspondence relating to a claim, immediately send a copy to ICBC;


===Information for accused persons===
f) must ''not'' voluntarily assume liability or settle any claim except at his or her own cost; and
g) must ''not'' fail to cooperate with ICBC in the investigation, settlement or defence of a claim or action. </blockquote>


It is the policy of the provincial Ministry of Justice that incidents of spousal assault are to be treated as significant crimes. As a result, if your partner accuses you of assault, you may be arrested and you could be taken to jail overnight.
=== 8. Duties of the Corporation ===


If this happens, you will appear before a justice of the peace or a judge for a bail hearing. If you are arrested on a Friday, this may mean that you'll spend the weekend in custody, although provincial court judges are usually available by telephone or video link. At the bail hearing, the judge will normally require that you promise to follow certain conditions if you want to be released from custody. If you do not agree to abide by the terms the judge wants, you will not be released and you'll stay in jail until the hearing of the charges against you.  
On receipt of a notice of a claim under Part 6 of the ''IVR'', ICBC must, at its expense, assist the insured by investigating and negotiating a settlement where in its opinion such assistance is necessary, and defend the insured against any action for damages (s 74).


Typically, bail conditions include:
=== 9. Rights of the Corporation ===


*not to have <span class="noglossary">contact</span> with your spouse, either directly or indirectly,
Upon assuming the defence of an action for damages brought against an insured, ICBC has the right, subject to section 79 of the Act, to the exclusive conduct and control of the defence. This right includes, but is not limited to, the right to appoint and instruct counsel, to admit liability, to negotiate, and/or settle out of court (''IVR'', s 74.1).
*not to go to your spouse's home, school or workplace, and
*to keep the peace and be of good behaviour.


Other conditions might include restrictions on your use of alcohol and drugs, a curfew, a requirement that you report to a parole officer or the police, a requirement that you not go within a certain number of blocks of the complainant's home, a requirement that you not possess firearms or other weapons, and so forth.
=== 10. Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture ===


The conditions which the judge requires will be written down in a document called a Recognizance or an Undertaking. It is critical that you follow the terms set out in your recognizance. If you don't, you can be arrested for breaching them, and face a criminal trial on that charge as well. The terms of your recognizance will remain in effect until the trial or until they are changed at a hearing before trial.
Certain conduct by the insured or applicant can result in “forfeiture”, whereby the insured is deemed to have given up his or her right to be indemnified by ICBC. In this situation, the claim for indemnification becomes invalid. Apart from exclusions, a claim may be forfeited under s 75 of the ''IVA'' if:
<blockquote> a) an applicant for coverage falsely describes the vehicle for which the application is made to the prejudice of the insurer (s 75(a)(i));
b) an applicant for coverage knowingly misrepresents or fails to disclose a fact that was required to be stated in the application (s 75(a)(ii));


====Lawyers and your bail hearing====
c) an insured violates a term or condition of or commits a fraud in relation to the plan or the OIC (s 75(b); see [[{{PAGENAME}}#11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences | Section X.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences]];


You have a right to <span class="noglossary">contact</span> a lawyer when you are arrested. Most importantly, you have a right to have a lawyer represent you at your bail hearing. Call one. If family law proceedings have already started in civil court, make sure that the lawyer is aware of the fact, especially if you have children.
d) an insured makes a “wilfully false statement” with respect to a claim under a plan of insurance (s 75(c)).</blockquote>


Whether you're able to get a lawyer or not, make sure you speak to duty counsel before your bail hearing. ("Duty counsel" are lawyers paid by the [http://www.lss.bc.ca Legal Services Society] to give advice and limited help to people who have been arrested and do not have legal representation.) Usually, duty counsel will try to speak to everyone who has been arrested before the bail hearing. However, if the number of people stuck in cells is high, you may not have that much time with him or her.
'''NOTE''': According to [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1994/1994canlii3304/1994canlii3304.html?autocompleteStr=brooks%20v%20insurance&autocompletePos=3 Brooks v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia], 1994 CanLII 3304 (BC SC), per Bouck J, the purpose of s 19(1)(e) (now ''IVA'', s 75(c)) is to prevent intentionally deceitful misstatements for the purpose of defrauding the insurer; “exaggerated guesses” by an insured as to the value of a lost motor vehicle, or figures inserted for the purpose of goading an insurer into action, are insufficient to deny coverage unless a fraudulent purpose on the part of the insured is shown.


The point of all this is that you will doubtless want to ensure that the terms of your recognizance are fair, not too restrictive, and don't interfere with your ability to see your children or go to work.
However, ICBC may relieve the insured from forfeiture under s 75 if said forfeiture would be “inequitable”.  Furthermore, ICBC must relieve an insured from forfeiture if: a) it is equitable to do so, and b) the insured dies or suffers a loss of mind or bodily function that renders the insured permanently incapable of engaging in any occupation for wages or profit (''IVA'', s 19(3)).


Under certain circumstances, you may not be released from <span class="noglossary">custody</span>, regardless of the conditions you're prepared to agree to. This will depend on things such as the gravity of the alleged offence, any history of related criminal convictions, and the opinion of the crown as to the circumstances of the offence.
Because there are various definitions of “insured” in the ''IMVAR'' (and ''IVR''), the only reasonable interpretation of s 19 (the relief of forfeiture provision discussed above) is that it is to be read broadly to include all of the definitions: see ''Khatkar v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia'' (1993), 25 CCLI (2d) 243 (BC Prov. Ct.), per Stansfield Prov. Ct. J.


====Getting back together====
=== 11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences ===


Often a couple will want to get back together or even just want to talk about things after an arrest has been made. Sometimes the complainant will want to "drop the charges." A couple of points need to be mentioned:
Insured persons must be careful to abide by the terms and conditions of their plans and OICs. Coverage may be lost if an insured breaches certain conditions, including, but not limited to:
<blockquote> a) failing to comply with s 73 of the ''IVR'', to the prejudice of ICBC [[{{PAGENAME}}#7. Duties of the Insured| See Section X.B.7: Duty of Insured]]


*'''Dropping the charges:''' Criminal charges are laid by crown counsel, not by the complainant. The complainant cannot "drop the charges." Only the crown can do that.
b) operating a vehicle when not authorized and/or not qualified to do so (''IVR'', s 55(3)(a));
*'''Communication with your spouse:''' Do not talk to the complainant, even if he or she contacts you, if your recognizance does not allow you to communicate with him or her. No matter who initiates the <span class="noglossary">contact</span>, communicating with the complainant is still a breach of the terms of your recognizance and you may face criminal charges from that breach, as well as the other charges.
*'''Reconciliation:''' If the complainant truly wishes to get back together with you, he or she must talk to crown counsel and ask that the terms of your recognizance be changed to allow you to communicate with each other or share the same residence. There must be a hearing to vary the terms of the recognizance before those terms will be officially changed.


===The consequences of criminal charges===
c) using the vehicle in illicit trades, racing, or avoiding arrest or other police action (''IVR'', s 55(3)(b), (c) and (d));


Among other things, criminal charges relating to family violence can lead to:
d) towing an unregistered and/or unlicensed trailer (''IVR'', s 55(4));


*a ''stay of proceedings'', when the crown doesn't take the charges to trial and no criminal conviction is entered,
e) using the vehicle for a different purpose than the one declared by the insured in his or her application for insurance, except as “occasionally” permitted (''IVR'', s 55(2(a)); or
*a ''discharge'' following trial or a guilty plea (a discharge can be absolute or come with certain conditions, like a probation period, and depending on the type of discharge, there may or may not be a conviction and a criminal record),
f) naming in the owner’s certificate someone as the principal operator of the insured vehicle who is not actually the principal operator (''IVR'', s 75). </blockquote>
*a ''suspended sentence'', with conditions, a period of probation and a criminal conviction,
*a ''peace bond'' under s. 810 of the ''Criminal Code'', under which the accused will be required to comply with certain conditions, but which is not a criminal conviction and won't give the accused a criminal record, or
*a conviction punished by a fine, jail time, or both a fine and time in jail.


The most common results of family violence charges are a suspended sentence with probation or a short period of time in jail. Of course, the consequences of a guilty verdict will depend on the circumstances of the offence and any past record of conduct related to the offence.
'''NOTE''': When the court determines who the principle driver is, it will consider the entire period covered by the insurance plan: see [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1981/1981canlii608/1981canlii608.html?resultIndex=1 ''Dehm v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia'', 1981 CanLII 608 (BC SC)].  


==Tort law==
Despite any breach of condition by an insured, insurance money is still payable to third parties by ICBC in cases where the insured person was:
<blockquote> a) incapable of properly controlling the vehicle because of the influence of alcohol or drugs;
b) convicted under any one of the following sections of the ''Criminal Code'', RSC 1985, c C-46 (see also ''MVA Regulations'', s 28.01 Table 4): 
<blockquote>
*s 220 (criminal negligence causing death);
*s 221 (criminal negligence causing bodily harm);
*s 236 (manslaughter); s 249 (dangerous operation of a motor vehicle);
*s 252(1) (failure to stop at an accident),
*s 253 (driving while impaired or with a blood-alcohol level exceeding 80 milligrams per 100 millilitres);
*s 254(5) (refusal or failure to give a breath sample);
*s 255 (impaired driving causing bodily harm or death);
*s 259 (4): driving while disqualified;
*a conviction under the Youth Criminal Justice Act (Canada) for any of the above offences;
*“similar result” or conviction of these offences in a jurisdiction in the U.S.; or
*a conviction under ss 95 or 102 of the MVA or similar convictions under another Canadian or American jurisdiction (both concern driving while prohibited); or </blockquote>


Unlike criminal matters where the crown handles everything, a tort claim must be advanced and prosecuted by the person who has suffered the family violence. In family law proceedings, tort claims are usually included with the other relief asked for in the Notice of Family Claim or Counterclaim, although a tort claim can be made by itself, without other claims relating to things like divorce, parenting arrangements, and so forth. However, if you want to make a claim in tort as well as other family law claims, it is very important to include all your claims in one proceeding because otherwise you might not be permitted to bring the tort claim separately at a later date.
c) permitting another person to use the insured vehicle in a way that results in a conviction for any of the offences outlined above (IMVA Regulations, s 55). </blockquote>


Tort claims can only be heard by the Supreme Court; the Provincial Court does not have the jurisdiction to deal with tort claims.
=== 12. Making a Claim Under Part 6: Procedural Steps and Considerations ===


Tort claims are not like criminal charges where the court can punish the wrong-doer with jail or a criminal record.  The remedy the person who has suffered the family violence seeks is primarily ''restorative'': he or she would be asking for an award of ''damages'' to make good the harm he or she suffered and its consequences. Damages are money payments and may be awarded for, among other things:
==== a) Limitation Period ====


*pain and suffering resulting from the violence, sometimes just called general damages,
Section 76 of the ''IVR'' provides that any action started to enforce third-party liability for bodily injury and/or property damage (i.e. claims made under Part 6 of the ''IVR'') must comply with the ''LA'' section 3(2)(a) of the LA provides a two-year limitation period for actions for damages related to injuries to a person and/or property, including negligence claims against the driver and/or the owner of the vehicle driven.
*loss of enjoyment of life as a result of the impact of the violence,
*past wages lost because of the violence,
*future wages lost because of some inability, illness or other impairment resulting from the violence; this is sometimes referred to as lost earning capacity;
*rehabilitation and job retraining <span class="noglossary">costs</span>, and
*past and future medical care expenses related to the injuries suffered from the violence.


Damages can also be claimed as ''punitive damages'' or ''aggravated damages''.
Minors are not subject to a limitation period (''LA'', s7).  After the minor has reached age 19, s 3(2)(a) begins to apply and the two-year limitation period commences. However, if the minor’s guardian or litigation guardian receives a Notice to Proceed, the limitation period is initiated notwithstanding the minor status (''LA'', s 7(6)). The Notice to Proceed must meet the requirements of the ''LA'', ss 7(7)(a-g).


Aggravated damages are awarded when the wrongful act took place in humiliating or undignified circumstances or when the wrongful act was particularly horrendous. By law, aggravated damages are to be combined with general damages. Punitive damages are not intended as compensation to the victim, but rather are awarded when the wrongful act deserves additional punishment because it was of a "harsh, vindictive, reprehensible and malicious nature." They are an effort by the court to deter others from committing similar acts.
It is important to be aware of the limitation periods associated with ''IVR'' Part 7 benefits, see [[{{PAGENAME}}#C. Accident (“No-Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the IVR| Section X.C. Accident (“No-Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the ''IVR'']] below.


The most common tort claim in situations of family violence is a claim based on ''assault and battery''. ''Assault'' technically means wrongfully threatening to harm someone; ''battery'' means wrongfully attacking and harming someone. Assault and battery can include sexual assault, and a spouse can make a tort claim against their former spouse for sexual assault.
==== b) Duties Outlined in Section 73 of the ''IVR'' ====


===The challenges of tort claims===
An insured must comply with s 73 of the IVR.  Failure to do so may result in a claim being denied. '''See''' [[{{PAGENAME}}#7. Duties of the Insured | Section X.B.7. Duties of the Insured]].


This discussion is not meant to discourage persons who have suffered family violence from making tort claims for damages resulting from family violence; it's only meant to bring to readers' attentions the difficulties that can sometimes accompany tort claims relating to family violence. Notwithstanding these difficulties, it can be empowering and liberating for a victimized spouse to hold an abusive spouse accountable for family violence and see justice done. If you have been sexually and/or physically assaulted, you should talk to a lawyer who is experienced in handling such claims and seek advice.
==== c) Service on ICBC ====


The first drawback of a tort claim is that you will, in all likelihood, have to hire a lawyer if you want to make a claim in tort against your spouse. The law governing tort claims is not set out in a statute, like the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' or the ''[http://canlii.ca/t/8487 Negligence Act]'', it's mostly based on the common law. In order to succeed in your claim, you will have to prove that the assault or sexual assault took place, and that injuries resulted. It is often quite complicated to prove injuries, especially where they are mainly psychological or emotional.
A claimant who starts an action for damages caused by a motor vehicle or trailer must also serve ICBC with a copy of the Notice of Civil Claim the same way the defendant is served and must also file proof of service in the court in which the action is started. No further step in the action can be taken until eight days after the filing of the service in court (''IVA'', s 22).


Lawyers, of course, are expensive. While you may get some of your legal costs awarded to you if you're successful, that only happens at the end of the day after you've already paid a few months' or a few years' worth of bills. Lawyers who practise family law do not work on a contingency basis where they get paid out of the client's award; they charge by the hour.
==== d) Information and Evidence ====


Secondly, even if you're successful, your spouse must have some money or other assets from which he or she can pay your damages if you win. It's no good to spend tens of thousands of dollars on legal fees and win only to find that your spouse has no way to pay your award. This is called a ''dry judgment''.
ICBC has a broad right to compel the insured and others to provide information set out in the ''IVA''. Specific types of information that ICBC can demand are noted in s 11 (combined forms and information); s 27 (accident report); s 28 (medical reports for accidents before April 1, 2019); s 29 (employers’ reports); and s 30 (superintendent’s records).  


However, in the 1997 BC Supreme Court case of ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1f56v Megeval v. Megeval]'', 1997 CanLII 3721 (BCSC), where a tort claim was made in the same proceeding as a division of property claim, the court divided the family property equally between the parties, but awarded Mrs. Megeval $139,150 in damages for injuries resulting from assault. This amount was paid from Mr. Megeval’s share of the family property.
According to [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/1931/1931canlii473/1931canlii473.html?autocompleteStr=mcknight%20v%20general&autocompletePos=1 ''McKnight v General Casualty Insurance Co. of Paris''], 1931 CanLII 473 (BC CA), an insured need not provide information or evidence to an insurance company respecting a breach if the company is contemplating using such a breach to deny coverage to the insured. This is not considered to be refusing to cooperate with the insurer in the defence of the action. However, the insured may still have to provide information regarding the accident itself.


Thirdly, you will have to testify about the family violence and the effect it had on you in a very open, honest and personal manner. You will have to disclose your medical and counselling records, if there are any. You may also have to submit to medical and psychological examinations, both to prove your claim and sometimes by an independent expert appointed by your ex-partner.
== C. Accident (“No-Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the ''IVR'' ==


===Limitation periods===
=== 1. What are “No-Fault” Benefits? ===


A ''limitation period'' is a deadline by which a claim must be made and an action started. After the applicable limitation period has expired, you cannot make your claim. In assaults not involving family violence the limitation period is generally two years after the incident.
Regardless of who is at fault in an accident, ICBC pays benefits for injuries to the occupants of a licensed vehicle and pedestrians and cyclists injured by a vehicle described in any owner’s certificate. The accident benefits, commonly called “no-fault” benefits, are payable to an insured for death or injury caused by an accident arising out of the owner’s ownership, use, or operation of a vehicle in Canada or, with some restrictions, in the U.S. (''IVR'', s 79(1)).


Under  (s. 3 (1)) of the provincial ''[http://canlii.ca/t/8qx3 Limitation Act]'' there is no limitation period to claims based on sexual misconduct.
In [http://www.canlii.org/en/ca/scc/doc/1995/1995canlii66/1995canlii66.html?autocompleteStr=amos%20v&autocompletePos=1 ''Amos v ICBC''], [1995] 3 SCR 405, 1995 CanLII 66 (SCC), the Supreme Court of Canada laid out a two-part test for determining if death or injury falls within the scope of s 79(1).  The following must be met:
<blockquote> a) the accident must result from the ordinary and well-known activities to which automobiles are put; and </blockquote>


Similarly, there is no limitation period on claims relating to non-sexual assault if the claimant was a minor or living in a personal or dependency relationship (s. 3 (i) (k)). It is unlikely that there is any limitation period that applies to violence between spouses or parents and children.
<blockquote> b) there must be some nexus or causal relationship (not necessarily a direct or proximate causal relationship) between the plaintiff’s injuries and the owner’s ownership, use, or operation of his or her vehicle. That is, the connection between the injuries and the ownership, use, or operation of the vehicle must not be merely incidental or fortuitous. </blockquote>


===Awards===
''Amos'' reversed the BC Court of Appeal judgment and held that the plaintiff’s injuries were causally connected to the ownership and use of his vehicle. The plaintiff was shot while driving away from a gang who was trying to gain entry into his motor vehicle. However, Major J. noted that if the gunshots had been truly random and not causally connected to the plaintiff’s ownership of the vehicle then his injuries would not have been covered under s 79(1).


The amount of the damages that a court may award for tort claims based on family violence always depends on the circumstances. It is important to get legal advice to decide whether or not making such a claim is economically worthwhile in your particular circumstances. The range of outcomes is very wide and many factors go into a judge’s assessment of the appropriate award but here are some awards that the courts have made for assault and battery in a family context:
=== 2. Who is Covered? ===


* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/g2h5c A.M. v. S.O.], 2014 BCSC 4 physical assault in the form of an open-handed blow to side of head resulted in $20,000 for general damages.
Section 78 of the ''IVR'' contains a definition of "insured", which includes, in part: 
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/fsxwh Bird v. Kohl]'', 2012 BCSC 1424 the serious shoulder fracture, concussion, lacerations and scarring that resulted from repeated strikes with a shovel handle amounted to $75,000 for general damages, $15,000 for aggravated damages, $40,000 for lost wages and $25,000 for lost earning capacity;
*a person named as an owner in an owner's certificate;
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/fwktw Constantini v. Constantini,]'' 2013 ONSC 1626 verbal abuse during the relationship and pre-meditated break-in and aggressive assault post-separation did not produce permanent disability but it did result in post-traumatic stress disorder. $15,000 was awarded for general and aggravated damages.
*a household member of a person named in an owner's certificate;
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/fs8l9 D.G. v. R.M.]'', 2012 SKQB 296 a single instance of “horrific” sexual assault including striking, kicking and biting. $35,000 was awarded for general damages.
*an occupant of a vehicle that is licensed in BC and is not exempted under section 43 of the ''IVA'' (vehicles from the federal or a provincial  government other than BC);
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1k2jm Gould v. Sandau]'' 2005 BCCA 190, the trial judge awarded $2,500 for an assault that broke a hand.
*any occupant of a vehicle that is not required to be licensed in BC, but is operated by a person named in a driver's certificate;
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/1f56v Megeval v. Megeval],'' 1997 CanLII 3721 (BCSC) assault causing permanent disability resulted in $45,000 for the injury, $66,000 for lost wages and retraining, $2,500 for medical care and $5,000 in punitive damages.
*a cyclist or pedestrian who collides with a vehicle described in an owner's certificate;
* In ''N.C. v. W.R.B.'' [1999] O.J. No. 3633 (Ont. S.C.J.) multiple instances of sexual, physical verbal and emotional abuse that caused post-traumatic stress disorder was awarded $65,000 for general damages and $25,000 for aggravated damages.
*a BC resident who is entitled to bring an action for injury or death under section 20 (uninsured vehicles) or 24 (remedy for hit and run accidents) of the ''IVA''; or
* In ''[http://canlii.ca/t/fps0x Shaw v. Brunelle]'', 2012 ONSC 590 a serious wrist fracture resulting from physical ejection from the home resulted in $65,000 for general and aggravated damages, $25,000 for lost earning capacity, and an unspecified amount for cost of future care.
*the personal representative of a deceased insured.


These cases have been included only to give readers of this website a general idea of how the courts have treated tort claims based on family violence in the past. You should not rely on these cases to fix a dollar amount to your claim – seek legal advice from a lawyer with experience in this area.
=== 3. Benefits Payable ===


==The ''Family Law Act''==
==== a) Disability Benefits for Employed Persons ====


The provincial ''[[Family Law Act]]'' offers a number of different restraining orders that can be very helpful and can provide the same kind of protection as a criminal recognizance does, discussed above.
ICBC is obligated to pay “no fault” benefits to an insured person if:
<blockquote> a) within 20 days of the accident, the injury completely disables the insured; '''and'''</blockquote>
<blockquote> b) the insured is an “employed person” (''IVR'', s 80). </blockquote>


===Protection orders===
An “employed person” is defined in s 78 of the ''IVR'' as a person who, on the day of the accident or for any 6 months during the previous 12  months immediately preceding the accident, is employed or actively engaged in an occupation for wages or profit. Eligible insured persons who are completely unable to engage in employment can collect either 75 percent of their average gross weekly earnings or $300 per week, whichever is less, for the length of the disability or 104 weeks, whichever is shorter. See section 80 and Schedule 3 of the ''IVR'' for more details.


Protection orders are the primary way family violence is addressed under the ''Family Law Act''. Under s. 183(1), an ''at-risk family member'', someone on behalf of an at-risk family member, or the court itself can ask for a protection order, and the claim for a protection order needn't be made with any other claims under the act.  
'''NOTE''': There is a waiting period of seven days before disability benefits are paid out. Also, no benefits are paid for these initial seven days (''IVR'', s 85).


The act has a number of really important definitions that relate to protection orders. ''At-risk family member'' and ''family member'' are defined in ss. 182 and 1, respectively:
==== b) Disability Benefits for Homemakers ====


<blockquote><tt>"at-risk family member" means a person whose safety and security is or is likely at risk from family violence carried out by a family member</tt></blockquote>
Insured persons who are homemakers may also be eligible for no-fault benefits. If a homemaker sustains an injury from an accident, and it substantially or continuously disables the insured from regularly performing most household tasks, ICBC will compensate the insured for the duration of the disability or 104 consecutive weeks, whichever is shorter (''IVR'', s 84(1)). The insured will be compensated for reasonable expenses incurred by the insured in hiring a person to perform household tasks on the insured’s behalf, up to a maximum of $145 per week (''IVR'', Schedule 3, s 2(b)). However, there is no compensation for household tasks performed by an insured’s family members (''IVR'', s 84(2)). Starting April 1, 2019, this amount will be increased to $280 per week.


<blockquote><tt>"family member", with respect to a person, means</tt></blockquote>
==== c) Disability Beyond 104 Weeks ====
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(a) the person's spouse or former spouse,</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) a person with whom the person is living, or has lived, in a marriage-like relationship,</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(c) a parent or guardian of the person's child,</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(d) a person who lives with, and is related to,</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(i) the person, or</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(ii) a person referred to in any of paragraphs (a) to (c), or</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(e) the person's child,</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>and includes a child who is living with, or whose parent or guardian is, a person referred to in any of paragraphs (a) to (e)</tt></blockquote>


If you read the definition of ''family member'' carefully, you'll see that people who are just dating or are in another casual relationship aren't "family members" as the act defines the term. This means that people who are just dating or are in another casual relationship can't apply for protection orders.
If at the end of the first two years, the total disability continues, an insured receiving benefits under s 80 or 84 of the ''IVR'' can continue to receive the payments for the duration of the disability or until the age of 65, whichever is shorter (''IVR'', s 86). The no-fault benefits will be reduced by the amount of the Canada Pension Plan benefits if and when such benefits become payable to the insured (''IVR'', s 86).


====Making protection orders====
'''NOTE''': Any benefits payable under s 80, 84, or 86 of the IVR may be reviewed every 12 months and terminated by ICBC on the advice of its medical adviser (''IVR'', s 87).


When the court is asked to make a protection order, it must consider certain risk factors set out at s. 184(1):
==== d) Medical or Rehabilitation Benefits ====


<blockquote><tt>(a) any history of family violence by the family member against whom the order is to be made;</tt></blockquote>
In addition to the disability benefits described above, ICBC is obligated to pay all reasonable expenses incurred by the insured as a result of the injury for necessary medical, surgical, dental, hospital, ambulance or professional nursing service, or for necessary physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, occupational therapy or speech therapy or for prosthesis or orthosis (''IVR'', s 88(1)). In appropriate cases, ICBC may also provide attendant care to the insured to perform duties normally undertaken by the insured (''IVR'', s 88(2)(c)). Under Schedule 3, s 3, ICBC’s liability for rehabilitation benefits is limited to $300,000. For qualification: the amount by which the liability of the corporation is limited in respect of each insured injured:
<blockquote><tt>(b) whether any family violence is repetitive or escalating;</tt></blockquote>
*in the same occurrence on or after January 1, 1990 and before January 1, 2018 must not exceed $150 000, and
<blockquote><tt>(c) whether any psychological or emotional abuse constitutes, or is evidence of, a pattern of coercive and controlling behaviour directed at the at-risk family member;</tt></blockquote>
*in the same occurrence on or after January 1, 2018 must not exceed $300 000.
<blockquote><tt>(d) the current status of the relationship between the family member against whom the order is to be made and the at-risk family member, including any recent separation or intention to separate;</tt></blockquote>
Also, ICBC is not liable for expenses payable to the insured under a medical, surgical, dental, or hospital plan, or paid or payable by another insurer (s 88(6)).
<blockquote><tt>(e) any circumstance of the family member against whom the order is to be made that may increase the risk of family violence by that family member, including substance abuse, employment or financial problems, mental health problems associated with a risk of violence, access to weapons, or a history of violence;</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>(f) the at-risk family member's perception of risks to his or her own safety and security;</tt></blockquote>
<blockquote><tt>(g) any circumstance that may increase the at-risk family member's vulnerability, including pregnancy, age, family circumstances, health or economic dependence.</tt></blockquote>


Essentially, the court is required to look at the family violence in the overall context of the couple and the history and present circumstances of their relationship. When a child is a family member, under s. 185, the court must also consider:
==== e) Death Benefits ====


#whether the child might be exposed to family violence if a protection order isn't made; and,
In the event of the applicant’s death, ICBC will pay:
#whether a protection order should also be made for the protection of the child.
<blockquote> a) up to $2,500 for funeral expenses (see s 91 and s 4 of Schedule 3 of the ''IVR''), starting April 1, 2019, this amount will be increased to $7,500);
b) $5,000 if the deceased was a “head of a household” (i.e. was providing the “major portion” of household income), plus a Supplemental Death  benefit of $1,000 for each survivor other than the first, plus Additional Death Benefits of $145 per week for the first survivor and $35 per  week for each additional survivor for a duration of 104 weeks (see s 92 of the ''IVR'');


Recent court decisions like ''[http://canlii.ca/t/gf0ng Hughes v. Erickson]'', 2014 BCSC 1952 show that a protection order will not be made without evidence that family violence will likely occur. ''[http://canlii.ca/t/gf0ng Hughes v. Erickson]'', 2014 BCSC 1952 Even one act of physical violence may suggest that violence is ''likely'' to occur in the future.  It is not enough for the person asking for a protection order to say that they are afraid or at risk of violence; evidence must be presented of one of the s. 184 risk factors to allow the court to decide if it should grant a protection order ''[http://canlii.ca/t/g7rnf Whitelock v. Whitelock]'', 2014 BCSC 1184.
c) $2,500 if the deceased was a “spouse in household” (i.e. was supporting the household or helping to raise dependent children), plus a Supplemental Death benefit of $1,000 for each survivor other than the first, plus Additional Death Benefits of $145 per week for the first survivor and $35 per week for each additional survivor for a duration of 104 weeks (see s 92–94 and Schedule 3 ss 5, 6, 8 of the ''IVR''); and
====Protection orders====
d) $500 to $1,500 for the death of each dependent child, depending on the child’s age (see Schedule 3, s 5 of the ''IVR'').</blockquote>


The available protection orders are listed at s. 183(3) and include orders:
'''NOTE''':
<blockquote> Status with respect to “head of household”, “spouse of household” or “dependent child” is determined at the date of death resulting from a motor vehicle accident.


*restraining a person from communicating with or contacting the at-risk family member, going to the at-risk family member's home, workplace or school, and stalking the at-risk family member,
In addition, the ''Family Compensation Act'', RSBC 1996, c 126 [FCA], creates a statutory right for claims to be brought by the surviving spouse, parent, grandparent, or child of the deceased, in some cases appropriately as against ICBC.
*limiting how the person communicates with the at-risk family member,
*directing the police to remove the person from the family home or accompany him or her to remove personal property, and
*requiring the person to report to the court or to another person.


Under s. 183(3)(e), the court can impose any other terms in a protection order that may be necessary to protect the at-risk family member or implement the protection order. Protection orders remain in place for one year, unless the order specifies another term.
The ''FCA'' provides a statutory scheme for fatal accident compensation that abrogated the common law rule that no one has a cause of action in tort against a person who has wrongfully caused the death of a third person (see [http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2013/2013bcsc1168/2013bcsc1168.html?autocompleteStr=mcleod%20v%20ga&autocompletePos=5 ''Gaida Estate v McLeod''], 2013 BCSC 1168 (CanLII)).


If a protection order, an order from another jurisdiction that is like a protection order, or a ''Criminal Code'' no-contact or no-communication order is made, any previous ''Family Law Act'' orders are suspended to the extent of any conflict with the protection order. In other words, if there's an older order for contact with the children, but a protection order is made that stops the person with contact from communicating with the children, the parts of the older order about contact would be suspended.
The ''FCA'' intends to place the claimant in the same economic position that he or she would have enjoyed but for the death of his or her spouse, parent or child.  There are only a limited number of family members that would be eligible for compensation under the ''FCA'', and the definition of who qualifies for compensation is important.  The starting point to determine eligibility for bringing a claim begins with section 1 of the ''FCA''.
Compensation under the ''FCA'' is generally limited to the following:
# damages for loss of love, guidance and affection (generally for infant children of the deceased only);
# damages for the loss of services that would otherwise have been provided by the deceased to the remaining family members;
# damages for the loss of financial support to the remaining family members;
# limited out-of-pocket expenses incurred as a direct result of a death (funeral and related expenses); and,
# damages for loss of inheritance.


To find out more about protection orders, you may wish to read the booklet [http://www.clicklaw.bc.ca/resource/1319 For Your Protection: Peace Bonds and Family Law Protection Orders].
</blockquote>


====Changing protection orders====
==== f) Reinstatement and Revival of No-Fault Benefits ====


When a protection order has been made and hasn't yet expired, either party can apply to vary the order to:
No-fault benefits can be reinstated if a person receiving benefits goes back to work only to find that the injury comes back and prevents them from working ([http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1999/1999canlii6570/1999canlii6570.html?autocompleteStr=brewer%20v%20ins&autocompletePos=1 ''Brewer v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia''] 1999 CanLII 6570 (BC SC). This includes a situation where a plaintiff goes back to work prior to the end of the 104-week period and leaves work after the end of the 104-week period ([http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2016/2016bcca207/2016bcca207.html?autocompleteStr=symons%20v%20insu&autocompletePos=3 ''Symons v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia''], 2016 BCCA 207 (CanLII)).


#extend or shorten the period of time that the order is in effect,
=== 4. Restrictions and Exclusion of Benefits ===
#vary the terms of the order, or
#end the order.


When a protection order has been made without notice, that is, if the application was made without letting the other party know about the application ahead of time, the other party can ask the court to cancel the order.
Claimants should check the ''IVR'' carefully to find what restrictions are applicable to a given claim for benefits.  The following is merely a brief summary of some very complicated provisions.  Generally, ICBC is not liable to pay any of the benefits discussed above, in any of the following situations:
*if the applicant resides outside BC '''and''' the vehicle in which he or she was riding or driving at the material time was not designated in an owner’s certificate (s 96(a));
*if the applicant at the time of the accident was an occupant of, or was struck by, a vehicle that could not be licensed under the ''MVA'' or ''Commercial Transport Act'' (s 96(b)(i));
*if the death or injury resulted from the injured person’s suicide or attempted suicide, whether “sane or insane” (s 96(c));
*if the applicant was an occupant of a vehicle being used in an illicit trade at  the time of the accident (s 96(e)); or
*if the death or injury is a result of the applicant's medical condition, as distinct from an injury caused by the accident, unless the condition was itself a direct result of an accident for which benefits are provided under Part 7 of the ''IVR'' (s 96(f)).


====Enforcing protection orders====
Also, under s 90 of the ''IVR'', ICBC may terminate an insured’s benefits if an insured refuses to undergo any:
*medical, surgical, or other similar treatment, which, in the opinion of the ICBC medical adviser and the medical practitioner attending the insured, is likely to relieve, wholly or partly, the insured’s disability; or
*retraining or educational program likely to assist in the insured’s rehabilitation. 


Protection orders can't be enforced under the ''Family Law Act'', only by s. 127 of the ''Criminal Code'', which makes it an offence to breach of a court order. However, s. 188(2) says this;
If ICBC intends to terminate an insured’s benefit, ICBC must first give an insured at least 60 days notice in writing, by registered mail, of  their intention to terminate benefits. Under section 90(3) of the ''IVR'', the insured may, within that 60-day period, apply to the Supreme Court for an injunction against the termination of the benefits, on the ground that:
*the treatment required of the insured is unlikely to relieve the disability; 
*the treatment may injuriously affect the balance of the insured’s health; or 
*the treatment program is not likely to assist in rehabilitation.


<blockquote><tt>A police officer having reasonable and probable grounds to believe that a person has contravened a term of an order made under this Part may</tt></blockquote>
=== 5. Forfeiture and Breach of Conditions ===
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(a) take action to enforce the order, whether or not there is proof that the order has been served on the person, and</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) if necessary for the purpose of paragraph (a), use reasonable force.</tt></blockquote></blockquote>


====Potential impact on parenting arrangements====
The same provisions apply as those outlined under Third-Party Legal Liability. These are contained in s 19 of the ''IVA'' and s 55 of the ''IVR''. See [[{{PAGENAME}}#10. Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture | Section X.B.10: Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture]] and [[{{PAGENAME}}#11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences | Section X.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences]], above.
A finding by a court that family violence has occurred could impact on a court’s decision on what parenting arrangements and what allocation of parental responsibilities are in the best interests of a child.  For example, a court could determine that the perpetrator of family violence should have no parenting time, supervised parenting time, or that all of the parental responsibilities go to the survivor of family violence. However, there have been other cases where having concluded that family violence has occurred, the court still determined that sharing parenting time equally between the parents is in the child’s best interests. It is simply impossible to predict what a court will consider to be in the best interests of a child in any particular case as the analysis is very fact specific.
However, according to s. 37 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', in the best interests analysis, a court must consider, amongst other things the following:
a) The impact of any family violence on the child’s safety, security or well-being;
b) Whether the family violence is directed toward the child or another family member;
c) Whether the actions of a person responsible for family violence indicate that the person may be impaired in his or her ability to care for the child and meet the child’s needs;
d) The appropriateness of an arrangement that would require the child’s guardians to cooperate on issues affecting the child; and  
e) Any civil or criminal proceeding relevant to the child’s safety, security or wellbeing.
As such, if you are asking a court to make an order respecting guardianship, parenting arrangements or contact with a child and there has been family violence, or if you are defending such an application, it is important to present evidence that addresses these factors.


===Conduct orders===
=== 6. Making a Claim Under Part 7: Procedural Steps and Considerations ===


The court can make a variety of special orders, called ''conduct orders'', under Division 5 of Part 10 of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'' that may be used to address concerns relating to family violence. Conduct orders may only be made for one of four purposes set out at s. 222:
==== a) Limitation Period ====


<blockquote><tt>At any time during a proceeding or on the making of an order under this Act, the court may make an order under this Division for one or more of the following purposes:</tt></blockquote>
Section 103 of the IVR provides that any action started to enforce no-fault or accident benefits must do the following:
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(a) to facilitate the settlement of a family law dispute or of an issue that may become the subject of a family law dispute;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) to manage behaviours that might frustrate the resolution of a family law dispute by an agreement or order;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(c) to prevent misuse of the court process;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(d) to facilitate arrangements pending final determination of a family law dispute.</tt></blockquote></blockquote>


Conduct orders include orders:
*the insured must have “substantially” complied with sections 97-100 (See [[{{PAGENAME}}#7. Duties of the Insured | Section III.C.6.b: Duties in Sections 97-100 of the ''IVR'']] below); and
*the action must be started by the later of the following:
*a) with '''three months''' after the date of the response from ICBC;
*b) within '''two years''' after the date of the accident for which the benefits are claimed;
*c) where benefits have been paid, with two years after the date the insured last received a payment.
*These limitation periods also apply to minors.  In other words, the limitation date for Part 7 actions for minors does not commence at age 19 but commences on the date of the accident.


*requiring a person to attend counselling, or a specified service or a program like an anti-violence or anger management course,
==== b) Duties in Sections 97-100 of the ''IVR'' ====
*restricting communication between the parties,
*requiring a person to pay the costs associated with the family home, like mortgage or rent payments, property taxes and utilities,
*restricting a person from terminating the utilities serving the family home,
*requiring a person to supervise the removal of personal property from the family home,
*requiring a person to post security to guarantee his or her good behaviour, and
*requiring a person to report to the court to another person, like a counsellor or therapist.


Conduct orders can be enforced in a number of ways, including by requiring a person to pay up to $5,000 as a fine or to a party, or by jailing the person for up to 30 days. Jail will only be ordered when nothing else will secure the person's compliance with the conduct order.
An insured must meet the requirements set out in s 97-100 of the ''IVR''.  If an insured fails to do this to the prejudice of ICBC, ICBC may deny coverage of a claim. The following is a brief summary and claimants should refer to the ''IVR'' for more detail.  The insured must comply with the following:
*give prompt notice to ICBC of the accident;
*provide a written report within 30 days of the accident;
*provide a proof of claim (a standard form authorized by ICBC and provided to applicants) within 90 days of the accident; and 
*at ICBC’s request, promptly provide a certificate of an attending medical professional as to the nature and extent of the insured’s injury  and the treatment, current condition, and prognosis of the injury;
*at ICBC’s expense and request, be medically examined by someone selected by ICBC;
*where applicable, permit a post mortem examination and/or autopsy.


===Other orders===
'''NOTE''': For liability to cease (i.e. coverage to be denied), ICBC must have suffered prejudice as a result of the applicant’ s failure to comply.


Other orders are available under the ''Family Law Act'' that could be used to address issues relating to family violence.
== D. Uninsured Motorists or Unidentified Motorist (Hit and Run) Cases ==


*'''Exclusive occupancy:''' Under s. 90, the court may give one party exclusive occupancy of the family home and the property in the family home. This isn't a restraining order, in the sense that it prohibits the other party from entering the home, but only the person with exclusive occupancy is allowed to live there.
=== 1. Claims Against Uninsured Vehicles: Section 20 of the ''IVA'' ===
*'''Supervised parenting time and contact:''' Under ss. 45 and 59, a person's parenting time or contact can be subject to a requirement that it be supervised by a third party, like a relative or a professional supervisor.
*'''Conditions of parenting time and contact:''' Under s. 218, the court may impose terms and conditions on any order it makes. Where family violence is an issue, appropriate terms and conditions might restrict where the children are exchanged, and how the parties interact when the children are exchanged, or they might say that a party's parenting time or contact will not happen if the party is impaired by drugs or alcohol.


==Child protection issues==
While it is against the law, there are some drivers who operate motor vehicles without any insurance.  If a claimant suffers damages from an uninsured motorist, he or she is not without a remedy.  Instead, the claimant may make a claim to ICBC for compensation. 


The provincial [http://www.gov.bc.ca/mcf/ Ministry for Children and Family Development] is authorized to protect children from neglect and harm under the provincial ''[http://canlii.ca/t/84dv Child, Family and Community Service Act]''. Section 2 of the act sets out the guiding principles of the legislation:
==== a) Definition of Uninsured Vehicle ====


<blockquote><tt>This Act must be interpreted and administered so that the safety and well-being of children are the paramount considerations and in accordance with the following principles:</tt></blockquote>
Under the current ''IVA'', an “uninsured motorist” continues to be defined as someone who operates a motor vehicle without third-party liability coverage of at least $100,000.  When death, personal injury, or property damage results from the use of an uninsured vehicle, a claimant may apply to ICBC under s 20 for compensation.
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(a) children are entitled to be protected from abuse, neglect and harm or threat of harm;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b) a family is the preferred environment for the care and upbringing of children and the responsibility for the protection of children rests primarily with the parents;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(c) if, with available support services, a family can provide a safe and nurturing environment for a child, support services should be provided;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(d) the child's views should be taken into account when decisions relating to a child are made;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(e) kinship ties and a child's attachment to the extended family should be preserved if possible;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(f) the cultural identity of aboriginal children should be preserved;</tt></blockquote></blockquote>
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(g) decisions relating to children should be made and implemented in a timely manner.</tt></blockquote></blockquote>


Unlike the majority of the general rules governing how children are dealt with in family law, the best interests of the children is not the most important consideration under this act. The most important considerations under the ''Child, Family and Community Service Act'' are the safety and well-being of the children.
==== b) Limitation Period ====


===Reporting children to the ministry===
The claimant must meet the requirements set out in the ''LA''.  The claimant has two years from the date of the loss to start an action for personal injury, death, and/or property damage (''LA'', s 3(2) and ''Civil Resolution Tribunal Act'', s 13).


Certain people, including mediators, parenting coordinators, doctors, teachers, psychologists and psychiatrists, have a positive duty to report children in need of protection to the ministry. Section 14 of the act imposes a similar duty on anyone who believes a child is in need of protection, and makes it an offence not to report a child to the ministry. In other words, anyone — including a parent — who thinks a child needs to be protected from abuse, neglect, harm or the threat of harm, must report the problem to the [http://www.gov.bc.ca/mcf/ Ministry for Children and Family Development].
==== c) Rights and Obligations of ICBC ====


Once a child is reported as being at risk, the ministry will assess the report and determine whether an investigation by a social worker is necessary. The act gives the social worker looking into the alleged problem a fairly broad authority to investigate the complaint.
If ICBC receives such an application under s 20, it must forward a notice it to the owner or driver of the uninsured motor vehicle, by registered mail (''IVA'', s 20(3)).  If ICBC pays out any amount under this section, it is subrogated to the rights of the person paid (i.e. the successful claimant). Also, ICBC may maintain an action in its name or in the name of the successful claimant against the person liable (''IVA'', s 20(11)).


===The consequences of a report===
After ICBC has given notice to the owner or driver of the uninsured vehicle (“the defendant”), it has control over the resolution of the case.  ICBC is deemed to be the agent of the defendant for service of notice. Thus, the Claimant may start an action against the defendant by serving ICBC with a Notice of Claim in Small Claims or a Notice of Civil Claim in Supreme Court.


If the investigating social worker comes to the conclusion that there is a problem, he or she can do a number of things to protect the child or attempt to solve the problem. These include:
ICBC has the authority to settle or consent to judgement, at any time, in the name of the uninsured defendant. But, if the defendant responds within the time limit indicated in the notice, then ICBC is not entitled to recover from the defendant without a judgment (s 20(5)).
If the claimant serves the uninsured defendant directly and he or she does not enter an appearance or does not file a Response to Civil Claim, or does not appear at trial, or does anything that permits default judgment to be taken against him or her, then ICBC may intervene. ICBC can defend the action in the name of the defendant. ICBC’s acts are deemed to be the defendant’s acts (''IVA'', s 20(7)).


*providing support services to the family in the home, including referrals to outside social agencies,
==== d) ICBC Liability Limited ====
*supervising the child's care in the home, including random unannounced visits by the worker, or
*removing the child from the home and placing the child temporarily or permanently with relatives, a foster family, or a group home.


Of course, removing the child from the home is the most extreme step the worker can take, and is normally only used as a last resort.
There is a limit to how much ICBC will pay out for any individual claim made under section 20 of the ''IVA''. Regardless of the number of claims or the number of people making claims, the limit of ICBC’s liability arising out of the same accident is $200,000, including claims for costs, pre-judgment, and post-judgment interest (see ''IVR'', s 105 and Schedule 3, s 9(1)).  


====Information for reported parents====
The insured and the claimant both have an obligation to seek other sources of coverage. Applicants may have other sources of insurance, including claims or benefits under the ''Workers’ Compensation Act'', RSBC 1996, c 492, the ''Employment Insurance Act (Canada)'', RSC 1996, c 23, and/or the government of Canada or provinces or territories. It is important that applicants apply for all benefits they are entitled to under the above sources of coverage or other similar sources coverage since ICBC is relieved from paying the of judgment equal to what is provided by these sources.


Sometimes, in the middle of a nasty family law dispute, one parent will report the other to the ministry, and claim that the child is suffering in the care of the other parent. Surprisingly, these claims often involve allegations of sexual abuse. Not surprisingly, many of these claims are unfounded.
Furthermore, applicants should also apply for all benefits and/or coverage from any private insurance that they may have as soon as possible.  An applicant may have private insurance through their employer.  ICBC may not be obligated to pay benefits that could have been received (note: need not actually receive) from another source.  If a decision is made concluding that ICBC is not liable for these amounts, the limitation period for making a claim through the other source will most likely have ended. See section 81, 83 and 106 of the ''IVR'' for more details.


Whether the complaint is justified or not, you must cooperate with the social worker who investigates the report. Obviously, you'll want to prove that there's no justification for the report, and it may help you to refer the worker to the child's family doctor, teachers, and daycare providers who can say that the child isn't at risk and hasn't been abused.
Also, see [[{{PAGENAME}}#3. Exclusion of ICBC Liability | Section III.D.3. Exclusion of ICBC Liability]], below.


You cannot take any action against a person who has made a false complaint, such as suing them for damages, unless that person made a false report knowing it to be untrue.
'''NOTE''': Any dispute as to entitlement or amount of damages an insured is entitled to recover must be submitted for arbitration under the ''Commercial Arbitration Act'', RSBC 1996, c 55 (''IVR'', s 148.2).  


Once the social worker has concluded that there is a problem, there's very little you can do to get the worker out of your hair except do what he or she wants. It is critical that you comply with his or her "suggestions" about things like parenting courses, help from outside agencies, homemaking services, and so forth. If you don't do the things the worker suggests, you may be flagged as "resistant" to those remedies. This can trigger an escalation in the worker's involvement in your family and can lead to harsher conditions being imposed, such as the removal of your child.
'''NOTE''': Excess underinsured motorist protection may still be purchased through insurers and presumably is intended to be covered under ''IVA'' Part 4 (Optional Insurance Contracts).


The impact of a report to the ministry on your family law action will obviously depend on the circumstances and whether the investigation shows that there is actually a problem in your home. The simple fact that a report has been made will not give the other parent grounds to apply for a change in the child's residence; in fact, if other parent reported you to the ministry and there was no substance to the claim, it may stand as further evidence of the other parent's unwillingness to cooperate with you in raising your child.
=== 2. Claims Against Unidentified or Hit and Run Motorists: Section 24 of the ''IVA'' ===


====Information for parents making a report====
Where personal injury, death, or property damage over $150 arises out of the use of a vehicle on a road '''in British Columbia''' and the identity of the driver and owner cannot be ascertained (or the ascertained owner is not liable, as would be the case if the vehicle had been stolen), the injured party may sue ICBC as nominal defendant. For accidents occurring outside BC, see [[{{PAGENAME}}#1. Inverse Liability and Uninsured or Hit and Run Accidents Outside BC | Section III.E.1: Inverse Liability and Uninsured or Hit and Run Accidents Outside BC]].


Unless you are fairly certain that your child is being harmed by the other parent or stands in real risk of being harmed, you should not make a report to the ministry. There are a few reasons for this.
==== a) Reasonable Efforts to Ascertain Identity ====


Firstly, there is no guarantee that if the worker removes the child from the care of the other parent, that you will get custody of the child. The worker may well discover problems in your own household and give the child into the care of someone else altogether.
In order for a claimant to make a claim or get a judgment against ICBC under s 24 of the IVA, the court must first be satisfied that all reasonable efforts have been made to ascertain the identity of the owner and/or driver (IVA'', s 24(5)). [http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/1992/1992canlii1263/1992canlii1263.html?autocompleteStr=leggett%20&autocompletePos=1 ''Leggett v Insurance Corporation British Columbia''], 1992 CanLII 1263 (BCCA), states that the critical time of taking steps to ascertain the identity of the driver is immediately at the scene of the accident, and that reasonable efforts must be interpreted in the context of the claimant’s position and ability to discover the driver or owner’s identity. This could include taking down the description of the vehicle, including the license plate number, if the claimant is able to at the scene. If the identity of those persons cannot be ascertained, ICBC is authorized to settle any such claims, or to conduct the defence of the case as it sees fit.


Secondly, you run the risk of giving the other parent more ammunition in your family law dispute, allowing him or her to characterize you as mean-spirited and vindictive, and willing to stoop to anything to win. Worse, the other parent may be able to claim that you were using the ministry to make an end-run around the court process.
==== b) Written Notice to ICBC ====


Thirdly, you run the risk of inviting the ministry's continued interest (and interference) in your family. Nothing is as unpleasant as being subject to random, unannounced visits by a social worker whose job is to critique your parenting abilities and the child's home environment.
To proceed with the claim, the claimant must give written notice to ICBC “as soon as reasonably practicable” and within six months of the accident (''IVA'', s 24(2).  


===What happens if a problem is found===
==== c) Police Report Requirements ====  


If the worker investigating the report is sufficiently concerned about the child's living conditions and risk of harm, or the reported parent's willingness to cooperate with the ministry, the ministry may begin court proceedings.  
A claimant must make an accident report to the police (''IVA'', s 107(1)). More specifically, the claimant must:
*make a report to the police within 48 hours of discovering the loss or damage;
*get the police case file number for the police report; and
*on ICBC’s request, advise ICBC of the police case file number.  


If the ministry has taken a child out of the care of his or her parents, the ministry must commence a child protection action and seek a court order approving the removal. All child protection proceedings are held in the Provincial Court, and are run under special rules of court, the [http://canlii.ca/t/85tk Provincial Court (Child, Family and Community Service Act) Rules].
If a claimant fails to comply with the above without reasonable cause, then ICBC will not be liable to pay the claim made under s 24 of the ''IVA''.  


====When your child is not removed====
==== d) Limitation Period ====


Among other things, the court can make, at the request of the ministry, protective intervention orders for the following relief:
Once notice has been properly provided, the claimant must also meet the requirements set out in the ''Limitation Act''. The claimant has two years from the date of the loss to start an action for personal injury, death, and/or property damage (''LA'', s 3(2)).


*the on-going supervision of the child,
=== 3. Exclusion of ICBC Liability ===
*the on-going supervision of the child on conditions, including things like daycare, services for the parent, and the right of the ministry to visit the child in the home,
*prohibiting a person from contacting and interfering with the child,
*prohibiting a person from living with the child or entering the child's home,
*a term requiring the police to enforce the order, and
*the removal of the child if the parent fails to comply with the terms of a supervision order.


The ministry must serve you with notice of the hearing of their application, and you are entitled to attend court and oppose the application. You may call witnesses and present other evidence against the ministry's application.
There are certain situations where ICBC will not be liable to pay a claim made under section 20 and/or section 24 of the ''IVA''. ICBC will '''not''' be liable: 
*to a claimant, under s 24 of the ''IVA'', who fails to comply with section 107(1) of the ''IVA'' without reasonable cause (see [[{{PAGENAME}}#10. |  Section III.D.2.c]]): Police Report Requirements);
*to a claimant, under s 20 or 24 of the ''IVA'', for loss or damage arising while the vehicle was in the claimant’s possession without the owner’s consent (i.e. stolen) (''IVR'', s 107(2)(a)).  


You are not required to have a lawyer at this hearing, although the help of a lawyer is strongly recommended.
=== 4. Forfeiture and Breach of Conditions ===


====When your child is removed====
The same provisions apply as those outlined under [[{{PAGENAME}}#10. Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture | Section III.B.10: Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture]] and [[{{PAGENAME}}#11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences | Section III.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences]], above. These are contained in s 19 of the ''IVA'' and s 55 of the ''IVR''.


If the ministry has removed a child from your care, the ministry is required to set a "presentation hearing" within seven days, at which the ministry's action is either confirmed or overruled. The issue at this hearing is whether or not the child was in need of protection and was properly removed from the home. You will be served with notice of the presentation hearing and you may attend the hearing where you will be allowed to address the court and call evidence in support of your position.
== E. First Party Coverage Under Part 10 of the IVR ==


At the presentation hearing, the court may make interim orders for the following:
=== 1. Inverse Liability and Uninsured or Hit and Run Accidents Outside British Columbia: Part 10, Division 1 of the ''IVR'' ===


*that the ministry have custody of your child,
==== a) Section 147 Claims: Inverse Liability ====
*that the child be returned to you under the supervision of the ministry,
*that the child be returned to you, or
*that the child be placed in the care of someone other than yourself.


It is important to know that at a presentation hearing the ministry only has to show that there is a likelihood that the child was in need of protection to succeed and get an order that the child continue to live in their care. It can be very difficult to get your child back at a presentation hearing since the case the ministry must prove is so slight.
===== (1) What is Inverse Liability? =====


Within 45 days of the presentation hearing, assuming the ministry was successful at that hearing, a "protection hearing" is held. At this hearing the court may direct the parties (you and the ministry) to attend a case conference, if you and the ministry cannot agree on the terms of the order that the court should make at the beginning of the hearing.
Inverse liability coverage is part of the basic insurance plan, which covers costs to vehicle repairs when an insured is involved in an  accident out of British Columbia. More specifically, the basic compulsory coverage will pay for loss or damage to a BC vehicle resulting from  an accident occurring '''outside BC'''. but in Canada or the U.S. if the insured does not have a right of action under the law of:
*the place where the accident happened; or 
*the place where the person responsible for the accident is a resident (e.g. unidentified defendant following a hit and run collision).


A case conference is a relatively informal meeting between you, the ministry's representative, and the judge. Sometimes the social worker also attends. If you and the ministry cannot negotiate and agree on the terms of an order about your child during the case conference, the judge may make some directions about the conduct of the proceeding, such as the exchange of information and the scheduling of dates, and set a date for the continuation of the protection hearing.
===== (2) Who is Covered? =====


A protection hearing is a formal hearing before the judge. The ministry will attempt to prove that the order they seek is necessary, and will call witnesses, such as relatives, teachers, and social workers, to give evidence about the facts of the case. Since this is a formal hearing, you are allowed to cross-examine the ministry's witnesses. You will then be able to present your own case and argue about why the ministry's request is not justified.
Section 147 of the ''IVR'' has its own definition of “insured”, which includes: 
*(a) the person named as an owner in an owner's certificate or if deceased, his or her personal representative;
*(b) a person who can provide written proof that he or she is the beneficial owner of a commercial vehicle described in an owner's certificate; or 
*(c) the renter of a vehicle described in an owner's certificate.  


Remember that at the presentation hearing, the ministry only has to prove that there is a likelihood that the child is at risk and that the course of action sought by the ministry is reasonable. At the protection hearing, however, the ministry must prove that it is more probable than not that the child is at risk and that the course of action sought by the ministry is reasonable. This is a lot more difficult to prove than a mere "likelihood" of risk.
===== (3) What is Covered? =====


At the protection hearing, the court may make orders for the following relief:
“Loss or damage” in this section means damage to the vehicle and does not include compensation for medical or rehabilitation costs. Compensation is to the extent to which the insured would have recovered if he or she had a right of action. In other words, ICBC will pay to the extent that the other driver is found liable (''IVR'', s 147).  However, this amount is limited to the lesser of the cost of the vehicle repair, the declared value of the vehicle, or the actual cash value of the vehicle. 


*that the child be returned to you under the supervision of the ministry for a period of up to six months,
===== (4) Dispute Resolution =====
*that the child be placed in someone else's custody for a specific period of time,
*that the child be placed in the custody of the ministry for a specific period of time, or
*that the child continue to be in the custody of the ministry.


Again, while you are not required to have a lawyer at this hearing, the help of one is strongly recommended.
If the insured is found to be at fault or partially at fault, he or she will be responsible for paying for the remaining costs of repair to the vehicle, unless the insured person purchased collision coverage (see [[Optional ICBC Insurance (12:IV)#(1) Collision | Section IV.B.2.1: Collision]]). If a dispute between the claimant and ICBC arises  under  this section, it  must  be  arbitrated.  Once the arbitrator adjudicates the dispute, the reasons for the decision must be published.


At the conclusion of the period of time specified in the court order, the status of your child will normally be reviewed. It may be critical that you use the intervening period of time to comply with any directions made by the court or the recommendations of the ministry about things such as special courses, programs or services that you should take, since the court will be looking to see whether the risks or deficiencies that caused the child to be removed are still there. If nothing has changed, the terms of the order will likely be continued.
==== b) Section 148 Claims: Accidents in Nunavut, Yukon, Northwest Territories or the U.S.A. ====


To find out more about your rights when the ministry has concerns about a child's safety or plans to remove a child from the family home, you may wish to read the booklet [http://clicklaw.bc.ca/resource/1060 Parents' Rights, Kids' Rights.].
This section deals with the scenario of a person having a motor vehicle accident in Nunavut, the Yukon, or Northwest Territories, or the U.S. that involves an uninsured or unidentified motorist.  
<!--- HIDDEN
==Further Reading in this Chapter==


* <span style="color: red;">bulleted list of other pages in this chapter, linked</span>
===== (1) Who is Covered? =====
END HIDDEN--->


==Resources and links==
A person involved in a motor vehicle accident may be entitled to compensation under section 148(2) of the ''IVR'', if that person:
===Legislation===
*is a person named as an owner in the owner’s certificate, or a household member of the person named as an owner in the owner’s certificate;
*suffers death or injury in the Nunavut, Yukon, Northwest Territories or the U.S.; '''and'''
*the vehicle responsible is an unidentified or uninsured vehicle. 


* ''[[Family Law Act]]''
===== (2) How Much is the Coverage? =====
* ''[http://canlii.ca/t/7vf2 Criminal Code]''
* [http://canlii.ca/t/85tk Provincial Court (Child, Family and Community Service Act) Rules]
* ''[http://canlii.ca/t/8487 Negligence Act]''
* ''[http://canlii.ca/t/7vtc Controlled Drugs and Substances Act]''
* ''[http://canlii.ca/t/7vx2 Youth Criminal Justice Act]''
* ''[http://canlii.ca/t/8qx3 Limitation Act]''


===Links===
ICBC’s liability (i.e. the payout) is limited to $200,000 (see Schedule 3, s 11 of the ''IVR''). Payments are subject to adjustment if recovery or  partial recovery is made from another party (''IVR'', s 148(2)).


*[http://www.clicklaw.bc.ca/resource/1317 Canadian Bar Association BC Branch: Script on applying for a peace bond and filing assault charges]
===== (3) Exclusion or Limitation of Liability by ICBC =====
*[http://www.clicklaw.bc.ca/resource/1319 Community Safety and Crime Prevention Branch and Legal Services Society: Peace bonds and family law protection orders]
*[http://www.clicklaw.bc.ca/global/search?f=Abuse+%26+family+violence Clicklaw resources for abuse and family violence]:
*[http://www.clicklaw.bc.ca/global/search?k=child%20protection Clicklaw resources for child protection]
*[http://www.lss.bc.ca/publications/subject.php?sub=4 Legal Services Society publications on abuse and family violence]
*[http://www.familylaw.lss.bc.ca/legal_issues/childProtectionBasics.php Family Law in British Columbia website information on child protection/removal]


If a claim is made under this section, the claimant must be sure to comply with the requirements set out in s 148 of the ''IVR''. ICBC will not be liable (i.e. ICBC will not compensate the claimant) in the following situations:
*if the insured has a right of recovery under an unsatisfied judgment;
*if the insured was operating a vehicle without the consent of the vehicle’s owner;
*if the insured fails to comply with s 148(4)b) '''to the prejudice of ICBC''' (see immediately below); '''or'''
*if the insured fails to comply with s 148(5) (see immediately below).


{{REVIEWED | reviewer = [[Gayle Raphanel]] and [[Samantha Simpson]], November 15, 2016}}
===== (4) Insured’s Obligations Under Section 148(4) and (5) of the ''IVR'' =====


{{JP Boyd on Family Law Navbox|type=chapters}}
Under section 148(4)(b) of the ''IVR'', the insured:
{{Creative Commons for JP Boyd}}
*must file a copy of the originating process with ICBC within 60 days of the action commencing; '''and'''
*must not settle a claim without the written consent of ICBC


[[Category:JP Boyd on Family Law]]
Under s 148(5) of the ''IVR'', the insured (or his or her representative) must: 
*for accidents involving an '''unidentified''' vehicle, report the accident, within 24 hours of the accident, to the police, or the administrator of any law respecting motor vehicles;
*file with ICBC, within 28 days of the accident, a statement under oath that: a) the insured has a cause of action arising out of the accident  against the owner or driver of an '''unidentified or uninsured''' vehicle and b) setting out the facts in support of that statement; '''and'''
*at ICBC’s request, allow ICBC to inspect the insured’s motor vehicle that was in the accident.
 
:'''NOTE:''' Payments made under s 148 will be deducted from the amount aninsured is entitled to under Parts 6 or 7 of the ''IVR'' (s 148(6) and (7)). Also, ICBC will not be liable to pay any benefit, indemnity, or compensation payable from another source, including: Workers Compensation, Employment Insurance, and any government bodies (s 106(1)).
 
===== (5) Dispute Resolution =====
 
Any dispute between the claimant and ICBC under this section must be arbitrated. The arbitrator who adjudicates the dispute must publish the reasons for the decision (''IVR'', s 148(8)).
 
=== 2. Underinsured Motorist Protection (UMP): Part 10, Division 2 of the ''IVR'' ===
 
==== a) What is UMP Coverage? ====
 
$1 million of UMP coverage is part of the basic compulsory coverage motorists have with ICBC. It provides compensation against bodily injury or death for  the victim of an accident caused by a motorist who does not carry sufficient insurance to pay for the claims.  The maximum coverage under UMP is $2,000,000 (which an insured must pay an extra premium to purchase) for each insured person (Schedule 3, s 13 of the ''IVR''). This limit includes claims for prejudgment and post-judgment interest and costs. See section 148.1(5).
 
==== b) Prerequisites for UMP Coverage ====
 
Generally, UMP coverage is available where an insured’s death or injury is caused by the operation of a vehicle operated by an underinsured  motorist, and occurs in Canada or the U.S.
 
If an insured is making a claim for UMP coverage in the relation to a '''hit and run''' accident, there are additional requirements that need to be met. Under section 148.1(4), the following criteria must also be met:
*the accident must occur on a highway; and
*the  accident must have '''physical''' contact between the insured vehicle and the unidentified vehicle, '''if''' it occurred in the Yukon, Northwest Territories, or U.S.
 
==== c) Who Is Covered? ====
 
Section 148.1 of the ''IVR'' has its own definition of “insured”. Note that the insured need not be in his or her car to be eligible for compensation. Under this section, “insured” includes, but is not limited to:
*a person named in the owner’s certificate and members of his or her household; 
*any person who is an occupant of the insured vehicle; 
*any person with a valid BC “driver’s certificate” (i.e. driver’s license) and members of his or her household; and
*any person entitled, in the jurisdiction in which the accident occurred, to maintain an action against the underinsured motorist for damages because of the death of one of the insured.
 
==== d) Who is Not Covered? ====
 
There are certain people who are not entitled to UMP coverage. Section 148.1(3) of the ''IVR'' describes when ICBC will not be liable. The following are most relevant, whereby coverage is denied if:
*the insured’s vehicle was in fact not licensed and the insured had no reasonable grounds to believe it was; or
*the vehicle’s operator or passenger did not have the owner’s consent to operate or be in the vehicle and ought to have known there was no  consent (i.e. the operator or passenger is in a stolen vehicle). 
 
==== e) UMP Coverage and Accidents Outside B.C. ====
 
For accidents occurring outside BC, the '''law of the accident occurred determines the legal liability of an underinsured motorist''', whereas the '''amount''' of the UMP claim is determined by BC law. See section 148.2(6) of the ''IVR''.
 
UMP protection does not apply in a jurisdiction where the right to sue for injuries caused by a vehicle accident is barred by law (''IVR'', s 148.2(4)). UMP coverage does not apply to vehicles used as buses, taxis, or limousines (s 148.4).
 
==== f) Forfeiture and Breach of Conditions ====
 
Under section 148.2(5) of the ''IVR'', the same provisions that apply to those outlined under Third Party Legal Liability also apply here (see [[{{PAGENAME}}#10. Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture | Section III.B.10: Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture]] and [[{{PAGENAME}}#11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences | Section III.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences]], above.). An award otherwise available under UMP will be reduced by any amount forfeited by a breach outlined in s 55.
 
==== g) Dispute Resolution ====
 
Any dispute between the claimant and ICBC must be arbitrated. An arbitrator who adjudicates a dispute under this section must publish the  reasons for the decision (''IVR'', s 148.2(1.1) and ((2.1)).
 
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}}

Revision as of 17:55, 9 August 2021

This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on August 12, 2020.



NOTE: The following portion of this chapter was written prior to April 30, 2021. Therefore, though it is written in the present tense, please be advised that it applies only to claims for accidents that occurred on or before April 30, 2021.

ICBC is the sole provider of basic insurance for non-exempt vehicles in BC. Exempt vehicles are described in sections 43–44 of the IVA and also in section 2 of the IVR. For most vehicles owned, leased or operated in BC, third-party liability coverage up to $200,000 is only available from ICBC. Full coverage for exempt vehicles, extended coverage in excess of the basic coverage (third party liability insurance over $200,000, IVR, s 67), and collision (“own damage”) insurance may be purchased from either ICBC or from private insurers. See Section XI: Optional Insurance, below. Note that private insurers may have their own requirement for coverage that may be above and beyond the requirements of ICBC

Vehicles licensed in BC are required by law to carry basic compulsory coverage, which is evidenced by a certificate of automobile insurance issued under the IVA to someone licensed under the MVA (i.e. the “insured”).

NOTE: The definition of “the insured” varies somewhat from section to section in the IVA and IVR.

Driving while uninsured is an offence (MVA, s 24(3)(a)) which carries a maximum penalty of a fine of up to $250 and/or imprisonment of up to three months (MVA, s 24(5)(a)). Driving an uninsured vehicle is also an offence (MVA, s 24(3)(b)) which carries a fine of at least $300 and no more than $2,000 and/or imprisonment for at least seven days and no more than six months (MVA, s 24(5)(b)).


A. Scope of Coverage

Subject to various limitations and exclusions, basic compulsory coverage is set out in the IVR and provides the insured with:

  • indemnity for third party legal liability (Part 6);
  • accident benefits; no-fault benefits payable for death or injury (Part 7);
  • coverage for damages caused by uninsured or unidentified motorists (Part 8);
  • first party coverage (Part 10). This includes:
  • inverse liability (Division 1 of Part 10); and
  • underinsured motorist protection (UMP) (Division 2 of Part 10).

B. Third Party Legal Liability: Part 6 of the IVR

1. Indemnity

This insurance indemnifies the insured against liability imposed on the insured by law for the injury or death of another, and/or loss or damage to another’s property, to a total limit of $200,000 (IVR, s 67), to be shared among the victims of a motor vehicle accident (Schedule 3, s 1). The base limit of liability is $500,000 in claims made for a bus, and $300,000 in claims made for a taxi or limousine. Extended Third-Party Legal Liability coverage may be purchased at the insured’s discretion. (See Section XI: Optional Insurance, below). If the insured is found legally liable, and no extended coverage has been purchased, he or she is responsible for payment of any claims in excess of the above limits.

As of September 16, 2019, ICBC introduced a new insurance category (blanket insurance certificate) for transportation network services (TNS) or ride-hailing companies such as Uber and Lyft. The blanket basic coverage provides coverage up to $1,000,000 third party liability when the vehicle is a) hailed by passengers through the online platform and b) is operated to transport the passengers (IVR, s 154). This blanket coverage is not for individual drivers and it is mandatory for ride-hailing companies.

2. Who is Covered

The definitions of “insured” for this part of the IVR may be found in IVR, s 63. For our purposes, the most relevant definitions of “insured” are:

a) a person named in an owner’s certificate; or

b) an individual who operates the vehicle described in the owner’s certificate with the consent of the owner; or c) an individual who operates the vehicle described in the owner’s certificate while being a member of the owner’s household.

d) where the owner is not an individual,

(i) an officer, employee or partner of the owner for whose regular use the vehicle described in the owner's certificate is provided, or (ii) a member of the household of an officer, employee or partner of the owner, who, with the consent of the owner, uses or operates the vehicle described in the owner's certificate.

3. Extension of Indemnity

According to IVR, s 65, indemnity is extended to an insured who operates a motor vehicle not described in an owner’s certificate issued to the insured (i.e. someone else’s car). For the purposes of s 65 only, “insured” includes the following:

a) a person named as an owner in an owner’s certificate;

b) a member of the owner’s household;

c) an employee or partner of the owner, where their regular use of the vehicle described in the owner’s certificate is provided for; and

d) the spouse of an employee or partner described in paragraph (c) where the spouse resides with the employee or partner.

Note that, absent this expanded definition, “insured” would not otherwise cover a member of the insured’s household operating a vehicle not described in an owner’s certificate issued to the insured.

As of September 1, 2019, ICBC requires drivers to list out all the household members who may drive their vehicles, regardless of the number of times they may drive it. In addition, non-household members such as employees who may be driving the insured’s vehicle for more than 12 times a year will also be required to be listed at the time of purchasing the policy. The additional members listed will be factored into the calculation for the premium paid.

See https://www.icbc.com/insurance/costs/drivers-experience-crash-history/Pages/Default.aspx.

If a household member or non-household member, who was not listed on the principal’s policy, gets involved in an accident, ICBC will have the right to impose a financial penalty on the principal’s policy and the principal may also be subjected to a higher premium rate when renewing the policy in the future.

4. Restrictions on Indemnity

Section 65(2) of the IVR states that if an insured is operating a motor vehicle that is not described in an owner’s certificate issued to him or her, indemnity is not extended to the insured if:

  • the insured is operating the motor vehicle in connection with the business of a garage service operator;
  • the motor vehicle is owned or regularly operated by the insured;
  • the motor vehicle is used for carrying passengers for compensation or hire or for commercial use;

*In respect of a TNS-only vehicle operated under a transportation network services authorization, this corporation's exemption applies only if injury or death of another, or loss or damage to property of another, arises out of the operation of the TNS-only vehicle when

(a) the vehicle has been hailed by or for passengers through the use of the online platform to which the transportation network services authorization relates, and (b) the insured is operating the vehicle for the purposes of picking up, transporting or dropping off those passengers.

  • the motor vehicle is in fact not licensed under the MVA (or similar legislation) and the insured does not have reasonable grounds to believe the motor vehicle is licensed; or
  • the insured is operating the vehicle without the consent of the owner and does not have reasonable grounds to believe that he has the consent of the owner.

Section 77 provides, in part, that an owner seeking to rely on the coverage provided for a vehicle not named in the owner’s certificate cannot do so if he or she also owns (or leases) the non-described vehicle that has been involved in the accident (i.e. you cannot just insure one vehicle and expect this to cover all of the other vehicles in your fleet).

Neither garage service operators nor their employees are covered by the owner’s certificate issued for customers’ vehicles while the vehicle is in the care, custody, or control of the garage service operator or his or her employee for a purpose relating to the business. “Garage service operator” is defined in Part 1 of the IVR as “the operator of a motor vehicle service facility and includes a dealer, service station operator, motor vehicle repairman, auto body shop repairman, wrecker operator, and the operator of a vehicle parking or storage facility” (s 57). To offset the effect of s 57, the garage service operator must obtain special coverage pursuant to s 150.

5. What is Covered

In addition to the legal liability coverage (i.e. s 65 indemnification) outlined above, IVR ss 67 and 69 states that ICBC may also pay for:

a) “reasonable” emergency medical aid, so long as reimbursement is not provided to the insured by another insurer or under another Part;

b) emergency equipment or supplies provided to the insured (i.e. fire extinguishers, jacks or other necessary emergency equipment or supplies);

c) all or some (depending upon the circumstances) of the costs taxed against the insured in an action, in accordance with the Supreme Court Civil Rules, BC Reg 56/2019 for aggregated general and specific damages; and

d) the pre-judgment interest under the Court Order Interest Act, RSBC 1996, c 79 or analogous legislation of another jurisdiction on that part of the judgment, and pay post-judgment interest under the Interest Act, RSC 1985, c I-15 or analogous legislation of another jurisdiction on that part of the judgment, both within the limits set out in s 1 of Schedule 3 (IVR).

6. What is Not Covered

ICBC will not indemnify an insured for certain types of damage, including:

  • loss or damage to property carried in or on a vehicle owned, rented or in the care, custody or control of an insured (s 72.1); or
  • liability directly or indirectly arising out of the operation of attached equipment (i.e. machinery or equipment that is mounted on or attached to the vehicle, and which is not required for the safe operation of that vehicle) at a site where such equipment is operated, unless the attached equipment is used in accordance with the IVR (s 72(2)); or
  • under Part 4, 6, 7, or 10 in respect of injury, death, loss or damage arising out of radioactive, toxic, explosive or other hazardous properties of prescribed substances under the Atomic Energy Contract Act (IVR, s 56(1)(a)); or
  • under IVA, ss 20 (uninsured vehicles) or 24 (hit and run accidents), under IVR, s 49.3 (default of premiums); or
  • under Part 7 or Part 10 of the IVR in respect of any injury, death, loss or damage arising, directly or indirectly out of a declared or undeclared war or insurrection, rebellion or revolution (IVR, s 56(1)(b)); or
  • under IVA, ss 20 or s 24, under IVR, ss 49 or 49.3(1)(b), Part 6 or Part 10 in respect of punitive or exemplary damages or other similar non-compensatory damages (IVR, s 56(1)(c)); or
  • a general or special assessment, penalty or premium, payable under the Workers’ Compensation Act (British Columbia) or similar Act (IVR, s 72.1(1)(a)).

7. Duties of the Insured

An insured has a duty to report to ICBC mid-term changes, as required by s 9 of the IVR. These changes may result in an increase or decrease in the premiums paid to ICBC. The insured named in the owner’s certificate is obligated to report to an ICBC agent the following:

a) any change in the insured’s address within 10 days after the change;

b) any acquisition of a substitute vehicle for the vehicle described in the certificate within 10 days after the acquisition;

c) any anticipated change in the use of the vehicle described in the certificate to a use to which a different insurance rate applies before such a change;

d) any anticipated change in the territory in which the vehicle described in the certificate is principally used before such a change; and/or

e) any change in the location of where the insured vehicle is primarily located when not in use, within 30 days of the change, if the premium for the vehicle is established on the basis of this location, unless the vehicle is used for vacation purposes.

Furthermore, ICBC is not liable to indemnify an insured who, to the prejudice of ICBC, fails to comply with duties outlined in s 73 of the IVR. This section states that an insured:

a) must promptly give ICBC written notice of any claim made for the accident, including any other insurance held by him or her providing coverage for the accident;

b) must help secure evidence and information and the attendance of any witnesses;

c) must cooperate with ICBC in the defence of any action or proceeding, or appeal, taken by ICBC on behalf of the insured;

d) must allow ICBC to inspect an insured vehicle at any reasonable time;

e) must, on receipt of a claim, legal document or correspondence relating to a claim, immediately send a copy to ICBC;

f) must not voluntarily assume liability or settle any claim except at his or her own cost; and

g) must not fail to cooperate with ICBC in the investigation, settlement or defence of a claim or action.

8. Duties of the Corporation

On receipt of a notice of a claim under Part 6 of the IVR, ICBC must, at its expense, assist the insured by investigating and negotiating a settlement where in its opinion such assistance is necessary, and defend the insured against any action for damages (s 74).

9. Rights of the Corporation

Upon assuming the defence of an action for damages brought against an insured, ICBC has the right, subject to section 79 of the Act, to the exclusive conduct and control of the defence. This right includes, but is not limited to, the right to appoint and instruct counsel, to admit liability, to negotiate, and/or settle out of court (IVR, s 74.1).

10. Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture

Certain conduct by the insured or applicant can result in “forfeiture”, whereby the insured is deemed to have given up his or her right to be indemnified by ICBC. In this situation, the claim for indemnification becomes invalid. Apart from exclusions, a claim may be forfeited under s 75 of the IVA if:

a) an applicant for coverage falsely describes the vehicle for which the application is made to the prejudice of the insurer (s 75(a)(i));

b) an applicant for coverage knowingly misrepresents or fails to disclose a fact that was required to be stated in the application (s 75(a)(ii));

c) an insured violates a term or condition of or commits a fraud in relation to the plan or the OIC (s 75(b); see Section X.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences;

d) an insured makes a “wilfully false statement” with respect to a claim under a plan of insurance (s 75(c)).

NOTE: According to Brooks v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 1994 CanLII 3304 (BC SC), per Bouck J, the purpose of s 19(1)(e) (now IVA, s 75(c)) is to prevent intentionally deceitful misstatements for the purpose of defrauding the insurer; “exaggerated guesses” by an insured as to the value of a lost motor vehicle, or figures inserted for the purpose of goading an insurer into action, are insufficient to deny coverage unless a fraudulent purpose on the part of the insured is shown.

However, ICBC may relieve the insured from forfeiture under s 75 if said forfeiture would be “inequitable”. Furthermore, ICBC must relieve an insured from forfeiture if: a) it is equitable to do so, and b) the insured dies or suffers a loss of mind or bodily function that renders the insured permanently incapable of engaging in any occupation for wages or profit (IVA, s 19(3)).

Because there are various definitions of “insured” in the IMVAR (and IVR), the only reasonable interpretation of s 19 (the relief of forfeiture provision discussed above) is that it is to be read broadly to include all of the definitions: see Khatkar v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia (1993), 25 CCLI (2d) 243 (BC Prov. Ct.), per Stansfield Prov. Ct. J.

11. Breach of Conditions and Consequences

Insured persons must be careful to abide by the terms and conditions of their plans and OICs. Coverage may be lost if an insured breaches certain conditions, including, but not limited to:

a) failing to comply with s 73 of the IVR, to the prejudice of ICBC See Section X.B.7: Duty of Insured

b) operating a vehicle when not authorized and/or not qualified to do so (IVR, s 55(3)(a));

c) using the vehicle in illicit trades, racing, or avoiding arrest or other police action (IVR, s 55(3)(b), (c) and (d));

d) towing an unregistered and/or unlicensed trailer (IVR, s 55(4));

e) using the vehicle for a different purpose than the one declared by the insured in his or her application for insurance, except as “occasionally” permitted (IVR, s 55(2(a)); or

f) naming in the owner’s certificate someone as the principal operator of the insured vehicle who is not actually the principal operator (IVR, s 75).

NOTE: When the court determines who the principle driver is, it will consider the entire period covered by the insurance plan: see Dehm v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 1981 CanLII 608 (BC SC).

Despite any breach of condition by an insured, insurance money is still payable to third parties by ICBC in cases where the insured person was:

a) incapable of properly controlling the vehicle because of the influence of alcohol or drugs;

b) convicted under any one of the following sections of the Criminal Code, RSC 1985, c C-46 (see also MVA Regulations, s 28.01 Table 4):

  • s 220 (criminal negligence causing death);
  • s 221 (criminal negligence causing bodily harm);
  • s 236 (manslaughter); s 249 (dangerous operation of a motor vehicle);
  • s 252(1) (failure to stop at an accident),
  • s 253 (driving while impaired or with a blood-alcohol level exceeding 80 milligrams per 100 millilitres);
  • s 254(5) (refusal or failure to give a breath sample);
  • s 255 (impaired driving causing bodily harm or death);
  • s 259 (4): driving while disqualified;
  • a conviction under the Youth Criminal Justice Act (Canada) for any of the above offences;
  • “similar result” or conviction of these offences in a jurisdiction in the U.S.; or
  • a conviction under ss 95 or 102 of the MVA or similar convictions under another Canadian or American jurisdiction (both concern driving while prohibited); or

c) permitting another person to use the insured vehicle in a way that results in a conviction for any of the offences outlined above (IMVA Regulations, s 55).

12. Making a Claim Under Part 6: Procedural Steps and Considerations

a) Limitation Period

Section 76 of the IVR provides that any action started to enforce third-party liability for bodily injury and/or property damage (i.e. claims made under Part 6 of the IVR) must comply with the LA section 3(2)(a) of the LA provides a two-year limitation period for actions for damages related to injuries to a person and/or property, including negligence claims against the driver and/or the owner of the vehicle driven.

Minors are not subject to a limitation period (LA, s7). After the minor has reached age 19, s 3(2)(a) begins to apply and the two-year limitation period commences. However, if the minor’s guardian or litigation guardian receives a Notice to Proceed, the limitation period is initiated notwithstanding the minor status (LA, s 7(6)). The Notice to Proceed must meet the requirements of the LA, ss 7(7)(a-g).

It is important to be aware of the limitation periods associated with IVR Part 7 benefits, see Section X.C. Accident (“No-Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the IVR below.

b) Duties Outlined in Section 73 of the IVR

An insured must comply with s 73 of the IVR. Failure to do so may result in a claim being denied. See Section X.B.7. Duties of the Insured.

c) Service on ICBC

A claimant who starts an action for damages caused by a motor vehicle or trailer must also serve ICBC with a copy of the Notice of Civil Claim the same way the defendant is served and must also file proof of service in the court in which the action is started. No further step in the action can be taken until eight days after the filing of the service in court (IVA, s 22).

d) Information and Evidence

ICBC has a broad right to compel the insured and others to provide information set out in the IVA. Specific types of information that ICBC can demand are noted in s 11 (combined forms and information); s 27 (accident report); s 28 (medical reports for accidents before April 1, 2019); s 29 (employers’ reports); and s 30 (superintendent’s records).

According to McKnight v General Casualty Insurance Co. of Paris, 1931 CanLII 473 (BC CA), an insured need not provide information or evidence to an insurance company respecting a breach if the company is contemplating using such a breach to deny coverage to the insured. This is not considered to be refusing to cooperate with the insurer in the defence of the action. However, the insured may still have to provide information regarding the accident itself.

C. Accident (“No-Fault”) Benefits: Part 7 of the IVR

1. What are “No-Fault” Benefits?

Regardless of who is at fault in an accident, ICBC pays benefits for injuries to the occupants of a licensed vehicle and pedestrians and cyclists injured by a vehicle described in any owner’s certificate. The accident benefits, commonly called “no-fault” benefits, are payable to an insured for death or injury caused by an accident arising out of the owner’s ownership, use, or operation of a vehicle in Canada or, with some restrictions, in the U.S. (IVR, s 79(1)).

In Amos v ICBC, [1995] 3 SCR 405, 1995 CanLII 66 (SCC), the Supreme Court of Canada laid out a two-part test for determining if death or injury falls within the scope of s 79(1). The following must be met:

a) the accident must result from the ordinary and well-known activities to which automobiles are put; and

b) there must be some nexus or causal relationship (not necessarily a direct or proximate causal relationship) between the plaintiff’s injuries and the owner’s ownership, use, or operation of his or her vehicle. That is, the connection between the injuries and the ownership, use, or operation of the vehicle must not be merely incidental or fortuitous.

Amos reversed the BC Court of Appeal judgment and held that the plaintiff’s injuries were causally connected to the ownership and use of his vehicle. The plaintiff was shot while driving away from a gang who was trying to gain entry into his motor vehicle. However, Major J. noted that if the gunshots had been truly random and not causally connected to the plaintiff’s ownership of the vehicle then his injuries would not have been covered under s 79(1).

2. Who is Covered?

Section 78 of the IVR contains a definition of "insured", which includes, in part:

  • a person named as an owner in an owner's certificate;
  • a household member of a person named in an owner's certificate;
  • an occupant of a vehicle that is licensed in BC and is not exempted under section 43 of the IVA (vehicles from the federal or a provincial government other than BC);
  • any occupant of a vehicle that is not required to be licensed in BC, but is operated by a person named in a driver's certificate;
  • a cyclist or pedestrian who collides with a vehicle described in an owner's certificate;
  • a BC resident who is entitled to bring an action for injury or death under section 20 (uninsured vehicles) or 24 (remedy for hit and run accidents) of the IVA; or
  • the personal representative of a deceased insured.

3. Benefits Payable

a) Disability Benefits for Employed Persons

ICBC is obligated to pay “no fault” benefits to an insured person if:

a) within 20 days of the accident, the injury completely disables the insured; and

b) the insured is an “employed person” (IVR, s 80).

An “employed person” is defined in s 78 of the IVR as a person who, on the day of the accident or for any 6 months during the previous 12 months immediately preceding the accident, is employed or actively engaged in an occupation for wages or profit. Eligible insured persons who are completely unable to engage in employment can collect either 75 percent of their average gross weekly earnings or $300 per week, whichever is less, for the length of the disability or 104 weeks, whichever is shorter. See section 80 and Schedule 3 of the IVR for more details.

NOTE: There is a waiting period of seven days before disability benefits are paid out. Also, no benefits are paid for these initial seven days (IVR, s 85).

b) Disability Benefits for Homemakers

Insured persons who are homemakers may also be eligible for no-fault benefits. If a homemaker sustains an injury from an accident, and it substantially or continuously disables the insured from regularly performing most household tasks, ICBC will compensate the insured for the duration of the disability or 104 consecutive weeks, whichever is shorter (IVR, s 84(1)). The insured will be compensated for reasonable expenses incurred by the insured in hiring a person to perform household tasks on the insured’s behalf, up to a maximum of $145 per week (IVR, Schedule 3, s 2(b)). However, there is no compensation for household tasks performed by an insured’s family members (IVR, s 84(2)). Starting April 1, 2019, this amount will be increased to $280 per week.

c) Disability Beyond 104 Weeks

If at the end of the first two years, the total disability continues, an insured receiving benefits under s 80 or 84 of the IVR can continue to receive the payments for the duration of the disability or until the age of 65, whichever is shorter (IVR, s 86). The no-fault benefits will be reduced by the amount of the Canada Pension Plan benefits if and when such benefits become payable to the insured (IVR, s 86).

NOTE: Any benefits payable under s 80, 84, or 86 of the IVR may be reviewed every 12 months and terminated by ICBC on the advice of its medical adviser (IVR, s 87).

d) Medical or Rehabilitation Benefits

In addition to the disability benefits described above, ICBC is obligated to pay all reasonable expenses incurred by the insured as a result of the injury for necessary medical, surgical, dental, hospital, ambulance or professional nursing service, or for necessary physiotherapy, chiropractic treatment, occupational therapy or speech therapy or for prosthesis or orthosis (IVR, s 88(1)). In appropriate cases, ICBC may also provide attendant care to the insured to perform duties normally undertaken by the insured (IVR, s 88(2)(c)). Under Schedule 3, s 3, ICBC’s liability for rehabilitation benefits is limited to $300,000. For qualification: the amount by which the liability of the corporation is limited in respect of each insured injured:

  • in the same occurrence on or after January 1, 1990 and before January 1, 2018 must not exceed $150 000, and
  • in the same occurrence on or after January 1, 2018 must not exceed $300 000.

Also, ICBC is not liable for expenses payable to the insured under a medical, surgical, dental, or hospital plan, or paid or payable by another insurer (s 88(6)).

e) Death Benefits

In the event of the applicant’s death, ICBC will pay:

a) up to $2,500 for funeral expenses (see s 91 and s 4 of Schedule 3 of the IVR), starting April 1, 2019, this amount will be increased to $7,500);

b) $5,000 if the deceased was a “head of a household” (i.e. was providing the “major portion” of household income), plus a Supplemental Death benefit of $1,000 for each survivor other than the first, plus Additional Death Benefits of $145 per week for the first survivor and $35 per week for each additional survivor for a duration of 104 weeks (see s 92 of the IVR);

c) $2,500 if the deceased was a “spouse in household” (i.e. was supporting the household or helping to raise dependent children), plus a Supplemental Death benefit of $1,000 for each survivor other than the first, plus Additional Death Benefits of $145 per week for the first survivor and $35 per week for each additional survivor for a duration of 104 weeks (see s 92–94 and Schedule 3 ss 5, 6, 8 of the IVR); and

d) $500 to $1,500 for the death of each dependent child, depending on the child’s age (see Schedule 3, s 5 of the IVR).

NOTE:

Status with respect to “head of household”, “spouse of household” or “dependent child” is determined at the date of death resulting from a motor vehicle accident.

In addition, the Family Compensation Act, RSBC 1996, c 126 [FCA], creates a statutory right for claims to be brought by the surviving spouse, parent, grandparent, or child of the deceased, in some cases appropriately as against ICBC.

The FCA provides a statutory scheme for fatal accident compensation that abrogated the common law rule that no one has a cause of action in tort against a person who has wrongfully caused the death of a third person (see Gaida Estate v McLeod, 2013 BCSC 1168 (CanLII)).

The FCA intends to place the claimant in the same economic position that he or she would have enjoyed but for the death of his or her spouse, parent or child. There are only a limited number of family members that would be eligible for compensation under the FCA, and the definition of who qualifies for compensation is important. The starting point to determine eligibility for bringing a claim begins with section 1 of the FCA. Compensation under the FCA is generally limited to the following:

  1. damages for loss of love, guidance and affection (generally for infant children of the deceased only);
  2. damages for the loss of services that would otherwise have been provided by the deceased to the remaining family members;
  3. damages for the loss of financial support to the remaining family members;
  4. limited out-of-pocket expenses incurred as a direct result of a death (funeral and related expenses); and,
  5. damages for loss of inheritance.

f) Reinstatement and Revival of No-Fault Benefits

No-fault benefits can be reinstated if a person receiving benefits goes back to work only to find that the injury comes back and prevents them from working (Brewer v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia 1999 CanLII 6570 (BC SC). This includes a situation where a plaintiff goes back to work prior to the end of the 104-week period and leaves work after the end of the 104-week period (Symons v Insurance Corporation of British Columbia, 2016 BCCA 207 (CanLII)).

4. Restrictions and Exclusion of Benefits

Claimants should check the IVR carefully to find what restrictions are applicable to a given claim for benefits. The following is merely a brief summary of some very complicated provisions. Generally, ICBC is not liable to pay any of the benefits discussed above, in any of the following situations:

  • if the applicant resides outside BC and the vehicle in which he or she was riding or driving at the material time was not designated in an owner’s certificate (s 96(a));
  • if the applicant at the time of the accident was an occupant of, or was struck by, a vehicle that could not be licensed under the MVA or Commercial Transport Act (s 96(b)(i));
  • if the death or injury resulted from the injured person’s suicide or attempted suicide, whether “sane or insane” (s 96(c));
  • if the applicant was an occupant of a vehicle being used in an illicit trade at the time of the accident (s 96(e)); or
  • if the death or injury is a result of the applicant's medical condition, as distinct from an injury caused by the accident, unless the condition was itself a direct result of an accident for which benefits are provided under Part 7 of the IVR (s 96(f)).

Also, under s 90 of the IVR, ICBC may terminate an insured’s benefits if an insured refuses to undergo any:

  • medical, surgical, or other similar treatment, which, in the opinion of the ICBC medical adviser and the medical practitioner attending the insured, is likely to relieve, wholly or partly, the insured’s disability; or
  • retraining or educational program likely to assist in the insured’s rehabilitation.

If ICBC intends to terminate an insured’s benefit, ICBC must first give an insured at least 60 days notice in writing, by registered mail, of their intention to terminate benefits. Under section 90(3) of the IVR, the insured may, within that 60-day period, apply to the Supreme Court for an injunction against the termination of the benefits, on the ground that:

  • the treatment required of the insured is unlikely to relieve the disability;
  • the treatment may injuriously affect the balance of the insured’s health; or
  • the treatment program is not likely to assist in rehabilitation.

5. Forfeiture and Breach of Conditions

The same provisions apply as those outlined under Third-Party Legal Liability. These are contained in s 19 of the IVA and s 55 of the IVR. See Section X.B.10: Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture and Section X.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences, above.

6. Making a Claim Under Part 7: Procedural Steps and Considerations

a) Limitation Period

Section 103 of the IVR provides that any action started to enforce no-fault or accident benefits must do the following:

  • the insured must have “substantially” complied with sections 97-100 (See Section III.C.6.b: Duties in Sections 97-100 of the IVR below); and
  • the action must be started by the later of the following:
  • a) with three months after the date of the response from ICBC;
  • b) within two years after the date of the accident for which the benefits are claimed;
  • c) where benefits have been paid, with two years after the date the insured last received a payment.
  • These limitation periods also apply to minors. In other words, the limitation date for Part 7 actions for minors does not commence at age 19 but commences on the date of the accident.

b) Duties in Sections 97-100 of the IVR

An insured must meet the requirements set out in s 97-100 of the IVR. If an insured fails to do this to the prejudice of ICBC, ICBC may deny coverage of a claim. The following is a brief summary and claimants should refer to the IVR for more detail. The insured must comply with the following:

  • give prompt notice to ICBC of the accident;
  • provide a written report within 30 days of the accident;
  • provide a proof of claim (a standard form authorized by ICBC and provided to applicants) within 90 days of the accident; and
  • at ICBC’s request, promptly provide a certificate of an attending medical professional as to the nature and extent of the insured’s injury and the treatment, current condition, and prognosis of the injury;
  • at ICBC’s expense and request, be medically examined by someone selected by ICBC;
  • where applicable, permit a post mortem examination and/or autopsy.

NOTE: For liability to cease (i.e. coverage to be denied), ICBC must have suffered prejudice as a result of the applicant’ s failure to comply.

D. Uninsured Motorists or Unidentified Motorist (Hit and Run) Cases

1. Claims Against Uninsured Vehicles: Section 20 of the IVA

While it is against the law, there are some drivers who operate motor vehicles without any insurance. If a claimant suffers damages from an uninsured motorist, he or she is not without a remedy. Instead, the claimant may make a claim to ICBC for compensation.

a) Definition of Uninsured Vehicle

Under the current IVA, an “uninsured motorist” continues to be defined as someone who operates a motor vehicle without third-party liability coverage of at least $100,000. When death, personal injury, or property damage results from the use of an uninsured vehicle, a claimant may apply to ICBC under s 20 for compensation.

b) Limitation Period

The claimant must meet the requirements set out in the LA. The claimant has two years from the date of the loss to start an action for personal injury, death, and/or property damage (LA, s 3(2) and Civil Resolution Tribunal Act, s 13).

c) Rights and Obligations of ICBC

If ICBC receives such an application under s 20, it must forward a notice it to the owner or driver of the uninsured motor vehicle, by registered mail (IVA, s 20(3)). If ICBC pays out any amount under this section, it is subrogated to the rights of the person paid (i.e. the successful claimant). Also, ICBC may maintain an action in its name or in the name of the successful claimant against the person liable (IVA, s 20(11)).

After ICBC has given notice to the owner or driver of the uninsured vehicle (“the defendant”), it has control over the resolution of the case. ICBC is deemed to be the agent of the defendant for service of notice. Thus, the Claimant may start an action against the defendant by serving ICBC with a Notice of Claim in Small Claims or a Notice of Civil Claim in Supreme Court.

ICBC has the authority to settle or consent to judgement, at any time, in the name of the uninsured defendant. But, if the defendant responds within the time limit indicated in the notice, then ICBC is not entitled to recover from the defendant without a judgment (s 20(5)).

If the claimant serves the uninsured defendant directly and he or she does not enter an appearance or does not file a Response to Civil Claim, or does not appear at trial, or does anything that permits default judgment to be taken against him or her, then ICBC may intervene. ICBC can defend the action in the name of the defendant. ICBC’s acts are deemed to be the defendant’s acts (IVA, s 20(7)).

d) ICBC Liability Limited

There is a limit to how much ICBC will pay out for any individual claim made under section 20 of the IVA. Regardless of the number of claims or the number of people making claims, the limit of ICBC’s liability arising out of the same accident is $200,000, including claims for costs, pre-judgment, and post-judgment interest (see IVR, s 105 and Schedule 3, s 9(1)).

The insured and the claimant both have an obligation to seek other sources of coverage. Applicants may have other sources of insurance, including claims or benefits under the Workers’ Compensation Act, RSBC 1996, c 492, the Employment Insurance Act (Canada), RSC 1996, c 23, and/or the government of Canada or provinces or territories. It is important that applicants apply for all benefits they are entitled to under the above sources of coverage or other similar sources coverage since ICBC is relieved from paying the of judgment equal to what is provided by these sources.

Furthermore, applicants should also apply for all benefits and/or coverage from any private insurance that they may have as soon as possible. An applicant may have private insurance through their employer. ICBC may not be obligated to pay benefits that could have been received (note: need not actually receive) from another source. If a decision is made concluding that ICBC is not liable for these amounts, the limitation period for making a claim through the other source will most likely have ended. See section 81, 83 and 106 of the IVR for more details.

Also, see Section III.D.3. Exclusion of ICBC Liability, below.

NOTE: Any dispute as to entitlement or amount of damages an insured is entitled to recover must be submitted for arbitration under the Commercial Arbitration Act, RSBC 1996, c 55 (IVR, s 148.2).

NOTE: Excess underinsured motorist protection may still be purchased through insurers and presumably is intended to be covered under IVA Part 4 (Optional Insurance Contracts).

2. Claims Against Unidentified or Hit and Run Motorists: Section 24 of the IVA

Where personal injury, death, or property damage over $150 arises out of the use of a vehicle on a road in British Columbia and the identity of the driver and owner cannot be ascertained (or the ascertained owner is not liable, as would be the case if the vehicle had been stolen), the injured party may sue ICBC as nominal defendant. For accidents occurring outside BC, see Section III.E.1: Inverse Liability and Uninsured or Hit and Run Accidents Outside BC.

a) Reasonable Efforts to Ascertain Identity

In order for a claimant to make a claim or get a judgment against ICBC under s 24 of the IVA, the court must first be satisfied that all reasonable efforts have been made to ascertain the identity of the owner and/or driver (IVA, s 24(5)). Leggett v Insurance Corporation British Columbia, 1992 CanLII 1263 (BCCA), states that the critical time of taking steps to ascertain the identity of the driver is immediately at the scene of the accident, and that reasonable efforts must be interpreted in the context of the claimant’s position and ability to discover the driver or owner’s identity. This could include taking down the description of the vehicle, including the license plate number, if the claimant is able to at the scene. If the identity of those persons cannot be ascertained, ICBC is authorized to settle any such claims, or to conduct the defence of the case as it sees fit.

b) Written Notice to ICBC

To proceed with the claim, the claimant must give written notice to ICBC “as soon as reasonably practicable” and within six months of the accident (IVA, s 24(2).

c) Police Report Requirements

A claimant must make an accident report to the police (IVA, s 107(1)). More specifically, the claimant must:

  • make a report to the police within 48 hours of discovering the loss or damage;
  • get the police case file number for the police report; and
  • on ICBC’s request, advise ICBC of the police case file number.

If a claimant fails to comply with the above without reasonable cause, then ICBC will not be liable to pay the claim made under s 24 of the IVA.

d) Limitation Period

Once notice has been properly provided, the claimant must also meet the requirements set out in the Limitation Act. The claimant has two years from the date of the loss to start an action for personal injury, death, and/or property damage (LA, s 3(2)).

3. Exclusion of ICBC Liability

There are certain situations where ICBC will not be liable to pay a claim made under section 20 and/or section 24 of the IVA. ICBC will not be liable:

  • to a claimant, under s 24 of the IVA, who fails to comply with section 107(1) of the IVA without reasonable cause (see Section III.D.2.c): Police Report Requirements);
  • to a claimant, under s 20 or 24 of the IVA, for loss or damage arising while the vehicle was in the claimant’s possession without the owner’s consent (i.e. stolen) (IVR, s 107(2)(a)).

4. Forfeiture and Breach of Conditions

The same provisions apply as those outlined under Section III.B.10: Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture and Section III.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences, above. These are contained in s 19 of the IVA and s 55 of the IVR.

E. First Party Coverage Under Part 10 of the IVR

1. Inverse Liability and Uninsured or Hit and Run Accidents Outside British Columbia: Part 10, Division 1 of the IVR

a) Section 147 Claims: Inverse Liability

(1) What is Inverse Liability?

Inverse liability coverage is part of the basic insurance plan, which covers costs to vehicle repairs when an insured is involved in an accident out of British Columbia. More specifically, the basic compulsory coverage will pay for loss or damage to a BC vehicle resulting from an accident occurring outside BC. but in Canada or the U.S. if the insured does not have a right of action under the law of:

  • the place where the accident happened; or
  • the place where the person responsible for the accident is a resident (e.g. unidentified defendant following a hit and run collision).
(2) Who is Covered?

Section 147 of the IVR has its own definition of “insured”, which includes:

  • (a) the person named as an owner in an owner's certificate or if deceased, his or her personal representative;
  • (b) a person who can provide written proof that he or she is the beneficial owner of a commercial vehicle described in an owner's certificate; or
  • (c) the renter of a vehicle described in an owner's certificate.
(3) What is Covered?

“Loss or damage” in this section means damage to the vehicle and does not include compensation for medical or rehabilitation costs. Compensation is to the extent to which the insured would have recovered if he or she had a right of action. In other words, ICBC will pay to the extent that the other driver is found liable (IVR, s 147). However, this amount is limited to the lesser of the cost of the vehicle repair, the declared value of the vehicle, or the actual cash value of the vehicle.

(4) Dispute Resolution

If the insured is found to be at fault or partially at fault, he or she will be responsible for paying for the remaining costs of repair to the vehicle, unless the insured person purchased collision coverage (see Section IV.B.2.1: Collision). If a dispute between the claimant and ICBC arises under this section, it must be arbitrated. Once the arbitrator adjudicates the dispute, the reasons for the decision must be published.

b) Section 148 Claims: Accidents in Nunavut, Yukon, Northwest Territories or the U.S.A.

This section deals with the scenario of a person having a motor vehicle accident in Nunavut, the Yukon, or Northwest Territories, or the U.S. that involves an uninsured or unidentified motorist.

(1) Who is Covered?

A person involved in a motor vehicle accident may be entitled to compensation under section 148(2) of the IVR, if that person:

  • is a person named as an owner in the owner’s certificate, or a household member of the person named as an owner in the owner’s certificate;
  • suffers death or injury in the Nunavut, Yukon, Northwest Territories or the U.S.; and
  • the vehicle responsible is an unidentified or uninsured vehicle.
(2) How Much is the Coverage?

ICBC’s liability (i.e. the payout) is limited to $200,000 (see Schedule 3, s 11 of the IVR). Payments are subject to adjustment if recovery or partial recovery is made from another party (IVR, s 148(2)).

(3) Exclusion or Limitation of Liability by ICBC

If a claim is made under this section, the claimant must be sure to comply with the requirements set out in s 148 of the IVR. ICBC will not be liable (i.e. ICBC will not compensate the claimant) in the following situations:

  • if the insured has a right of recovery under an unsatisfied judgment;
  • if the insured was operating a vehicle without the consent of the vehicle’s owner;
  • if the insured fails to comply with s 148(4)b) to the prejudice of ICBC (see immediately below); or
  • if the insured fails to comply with s 148(5) (see immediately below).
(4) Insured’s Obligations Under Section 148(4) and (5) of the IVR

Under section 148(4)(b) of the IVR, the insured:

  • must file a copy of the originating process with ICBC within 60 days of the action commencing; and
  • must not settle a claim without the written consent of ICBC

Under s 148(5) of the IVR, the insured (or his or her representative) must:

  • for accidents involving an unidentified vehicle, report the accident, within 24 hours of the accident, to the police, or the administrator of any law respecting motor vehicles;
  • file with ICBC, within 28 days of the accident, a statement under oath that: a) the insured has a cause of action arising out of the accident against the owner or driver of an unidentified or uninsured vehicle and b) setting out the facts in support of that statement; and
  • at ICBC’s request, allow ICBC to inspect the insured’s motor vehicle that was in the accident.
NOTE: Payments made under s 148 will be deducted from the amount aninsured is entitled to under Parts 6 or 7 of the IVR (s 148(6) and (7)). Also, ICBC will not be liable to pay any benefit, indemnity, or compensation payable from another source, including: Workers Compensation, Employment Insurance, and any government bodies (s 106(1)).
(5) Dispute Resolution

Any dispute between the claimant and ICBC under this section must be arbitrated. The arbitrator who adjudicates the dispute must publish the reasons for the decision (IVR, s 148(8)).

2. Underinsured Motorist Protection (UMP): Part 10, Division 2 of the IVR

a) What is UMP Coverage?

$1 million of UMP coverage is part of the basic compulsory coverage motorists have with ICBC. It provides compensation against bodily injury or death for the victim of an accident caused by a motorist who does not carry sufficient insurance to pay for the claims. The maximum coverage under UMP is $2,000,000 (which an insured must pay an extra premium to purchase) for each insured person (Schedule 3, s 13 of the IVR). This limit includes claims for prejudgment and post-judgment interest and costs. See section 148.1(5).

b) Prerequisites for UMP Coverage

Generally, UMP coverage is available where an insured’s death or injury is caused by the operation of a vehicle operated by an underinsured motorist, and occurs in Canada or the U.S.

If an insured is making a claim for UMP coverage in the relation to a hit and run accident, there are additional requirements that need to be met. Under section 148.1(4), the following criteria must also be met:

  • the accident must occur on a highway; and
  • the accident must have physical contact between the insured vehicle and the unidentified vehicle, if it occurred in the Yukon, Northwest Territories, or U.S.

c) Who Is Covered?

Section 148.1 of the IVR has its own definition of “insured”. Note that the insured need not be in his or her car to be eligible for compensation. Under this section, “insured” includes, but is not limited to:

  • a person named in the owner’s certificate and members of his or her household;
  • any person who is an occupant of the insured vehicle;
  • any person with a valid BC “driver’s certificate” (i.e. driver’s license) and members of his or her household; and
  • any person entitled, in the jurisdiction in which the accident occurred, to maintain an action against the underinsured motorist for damages because of the death of one of the insured.

d) Who is Not Covered?

There are certain people who are not entitled to UMP coverage. Section 148.1(3) of the IVR describes when ICBC will not be liable. The following are most relevant, whereby coverage is denied if:

  • the insured’s vehicle was in fact not licensed and the insured had no reasonable grounds to believe it was; or
  • the vehicle’s operator or passenger did not have the owner’s consent to operate or be in the vehicle and ought to have known there was no consent (i.e. the operator or passenger is in a stolen vehicle).

e) UMP Coverage and Accidents Outside B.C.

For accidents occurring outside BC, the law of the accident occurred determines the legal liability of an underinsured motorist, whereas the amount of the UMP claim is determined by BC law. See section 148.2(6) of the IVR.

UMP protection does not apply in a jurisdiction where the right to sue for injuries caused by a vehicle accident is barred by law (IVR, s 148.2(4)). UMP coverage does not apply to vehicles used as buses, taxis, or limousines (s 148.4).

f) Forfeiture and Breach of Conditions

Under section 148.2(5) of the IVR, the same provisions that apply to those outlined under Third Party Legal Liability also apply here (see Section III.B.10: Forfeiture of Claims and Relief from Forfeiture and Section III.B.11: Breach of Conditions and Consequences, above.). An award otherwise available under UMP will be reduced by any amount forfeited by a breach outlined in s 55.

g) Dispute Resolution

Any dispute between the claimant and ICBC must be arbitrated. An arbitrator who adjudicates a dispute under this section must publish the reasons for the decision (IVR, s 148.2(1.1) and ((2.1)).

© Copyright 2023, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society.