2,734
edits
Difference between revisions of "Consumer Protection from Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts (11:IV)"
From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Consumer Protection from Deceptive and Unconscionable Acts (11:IV) (view source)
Revision as of 20:23, 29 August 2023
, 20:23, 29 August 2023no edit summary
| (2 intermediate revisions by 2 users not shown) | |||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
{{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= | {{REVIEWED LSLAP | date= August 1, 2023}} | ||
{{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = consumer}} | {{LSLAP Manual TOC|expanded = consumer}} | ||
| Line 69: | Line 69: | ||
The court may draw the conclusion that a practice is deceptive on the basis of vague contractual language in circumstances where that language allowed the supplier to claim that additional work was not part of the original contract: see [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1999/1999canlii6663/1999canlii6663.html?autocompleteStr=British%20Columbia%20(Director%20of%20Trade%20Practices)%20v%20Van%20City%20Construction%20Ltd&autocompletePos=2 ''British Columbia (Director of Trade Practices) v Van City Construction Ltd'', [1999<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No 2033 (SC) (QL)]. | The court may draw the conclusion that a practice is deceptive on the basis of vague contractual language in circumstances where that language allowed the supplier to claim that additional work was not part of the original contract: see [https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/1999/1999canlii6663/1999canlii6663.html?autocompleteStr=British%20Columbia%20(Director%20of%20Trade%20Practices)%20v%20Van%20City%20Construction%20Ltd&autocompletePos=2 ''British Columbia (Director of Trade Practices) v Van City Construction Ltd'', [1999<nowiki>]</nowiki> BCJ No 2033 (SC) (QL)]. | ||
For a list of statutorily defined deceptive acts and practices, see the following link: http://www.bclaws.ca/civix/document/id/complete/statreg/04002_02#section4 | |||
=== 2. Unconscionable Acts === | === 2. Unconscionable Acts === | ||
| Line 113: | Line 115: | ||
Consumer Protection BC [CPBC] is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the ''BPCPA'' and is also empowered by another piece of legislation: the ''Business Practices and Consumer Protection Authority Act'', SBC 2004, c 3. Part 10 of the ''BPCPA'' contains all inspecting and enforcement powers of CPBC, its inspectors, and the Director. The Director has the power to: | Consumer Protection BC [CPBC] is responsible for the administration and enforcement of the ''BPCPA'' and is also empowered by another piece of legislation: the ''Business Practices and Consumer Protection Authority Act'', SBC 2004, c 3. Part 10 of the ''BPCPA'' contains all inspecting and enforcement powers of CPBC, its inspectors, and the Director. The Director has the power to: | ||
:a) Use the same powers that the Supreme Court has during trials of civil action for the purposes of an inspection, to summon and enforce the attendance of witnesses, compel witnesses to give evidence under oath or in any other manner, and to produce records; | :(a) Use the same powers that the Supreme Court has during trials of civil action for the purposes of an inspection, to summon and enforce the attendance of witnesses, compel witnesses to give evidence under oath or in any other manner, and to produce records; | ||
:b) Institute proceedings or assume the conduct of proceedings on behalf of a consumer; | :(b) Institute proceedings or assume the conduct of proceedings on behalf of a consumer; | ||
:c) Make an order (called a “freeze” order) against assets of a person who is being investigated (s 159). This order can also be attached to property being held in trust for a person under investigation. Thus, although CPBC is not empowered to actually seize money, it is able to freeze accounts, which can be a way to encourage supplies to transfer funds to consumers; | :(c) Make an order (called a “freeze” order) against assets of a person who is being investigated (s 159). This order can also be attached to property being held in trust for a person under investigation. Thus, although CPBC is not empowered to actually seize money, it is able to freeze accounts, which can be a way to encourage supplies to transfer funds to consumers; | ||
:d) Refrain from bringing an action against a supplier and accept instead a written undertaking under s 154 of the ''BPCPA''. This undertaking usually takes the form of a formal agreement between the Director and supplier and may involve consumer redress. It is probably one of the most effective remedies under the BPCPA because it avoids both the time and expense of court proceedings; | :(d) Refrain from bringing an action against a supplier and accept instead a written undertaking under s 154 of the ''BPCPA''. This undertaking usually takes the form of a formal agreement between the Director and supplier and may involve consumer redress. It is probably one of the most effective remedies under the BPCPA because it avoids both the time and expense of court proceedings; | ||
:e) Issue a compliance order under s 155 of the ''BPCPA'' where compliance is mandatory. The Director can order restitution and compensation to the consumer with this function (s 155(4)) without having to go through court proceedings. If a person fails to comply with a compliance order, they are committing an offence under s 189(5) and could face a fine of not more than $10,000, imprisonment for not more than 12 months, or both; | :(e) Issue a compliance order under s 155 of the ''BPCPA'' where compliance is mandatory. The Director can order restitution and compensation to the consumer with this function (s 155(4)) without having to go through court proceedings. If a person fails to comply with a compliance order, they are committing an offence under s 189(5) and could face a fine of not more than $10,000, imprisonment for not more than 12 months, or both; | ||
:f) File an undertaking, compliance order, or a direct sales prohibition order with the Supreme Court. Doing so would mean that the undertaking or order is deemed to be a court order, and thus it will be enforceable as such (s 157). This can be useful in encouraging resolution amongst parties. | :(f) File an undertaking, compliance order, or a direct sales prohibition order with the Supreme Court. Doing so would mean that the undertaking or order is deemed to be a court order, and thus it will be enforceable as such (s 157). This can be useful in encouraging resolution amongst parties. | ||
:g) Seek a declaration and/or injunctive relief on behalf of a consumer, or a class of consumers, and make their applications ''ex parte'' (s 172); and | :(g) Seek a declaration and/or injunctive relief on behalf of a consumer, or a class of consumers, and make their applications ''ex parte'' (s 172); and | ||
:h) Impose an administrative penalty under s 164. | :(h) Impose an administrative penalty under s 164. | ||
While there are a number of actions that CPBC is empowered to take, including pursuing civil and quasi-criminal enforcement, it is much more likely that CPBC will be involved in handling complaints and in investigations. Complaints can be initiated on Consumer Protection BC’s website: https://www.consumerprotectionbc.ca/consumer-help/start-a-complaint/. | While there are a number of actions that CPBC is empowered to take, including pursuing civil and quasi-criminal enforcement, it is much more likely that CPBC will be involved in handling complaints and in investigations. Complaints can be initiated on Consumer Protection BC’s website: https://www.consumerprotectionbc.ca/consumer-help/start-a-complaint/. | ||
