Difference between revisions of "Driving While Prohibited (13:XI)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Jump to navigation Jump to search
(Created page with "It is an offense under ''Motor Vehicle Act'' s 95(1)(a) to drive a motor vehicle on a highway or industrial road knowing that he or she is prohibited from doing so under: * ss...")
 
(2018 manual edits)
Line 1: Line 1:
It is an offense under ''Motor Vehicle Act'' s 95(1)(a) to drive a motor vehicle on a highway or industrial
It is an offense under ''Motor Vehicle Act'' s 95(1)(a) for an individual to drive a motor vehicle on a highway or industrial
road knowing that he or she is prohibited from doing so under:
road knowing that he or she is prohibited from doing so under:
* ss 91 (prohibition issued by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia for an
* ss 91 (prohibition issued by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia for an unsatisfied court judgment),
unsatisfied court judgment),
* 92 (prohibition against driving relating to fitness or ability to drive),  
* 92 (prohibition against driving relating to fitness or ability to drive), 93 (prohibition issued by superintendent in the public interest),
* 93 (prohibition issued by Superintendent in the public interest),
* 94.2 (driving prohibition for driving while impaired by alcohol or refusing to provide a breath
* 94.2 (driving prohibition for driving while impaired by alcohol or refusing to provide a breath sample without reasonable excuse),
sample without reasonable excuse),
* 215 (24 hour impaired driving prohibition),  
* 215 (24 hour impaired driving prohibition), 215.43 (immediate roadside driving prohibition), or
* 215.43 (immediate roadside driving prohibition), or
* 251(4) (prohibition for driving while failing to hold a license, or while an impoundment notice was issued on the license),
* 251(4) (prohibition for driving while failing to hold a license, or while an impoundment notice was issued on the license),
Then the person commits an offencse and is liable:
Then the person commits an offence and is liable:
* on a first conviction, to a fine of not less than $500 and not more than $2 000 or to imprisonment
* on a first conviction, to a fine of not less than $500 and not more than $2 000 or to imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or to both, and
for not more than 6 months, or to both, and
* on a subsequent conviction, regardless of when the contravention occurred, to a fine of not less
* on a subsequent conviction, regardless of when the contravention occurred, to a fine of not less
than $500 and not more than $2 000 and to imprisonment for not less than 14 days and not more
than $500 and not more than $2 000 and to imprisonment for not less than 14 days and not more
than one year.
than one year.
* The individuals driving record will also be blemished and they will receive a 10 point ''Motor Vehicle Act'' infraction on their record.
* The individuals driving record will also be blemished and they will receive a 10 point ''Motor Vehicle Act'' infraction on their record.
The term “knowingly” means that Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person
The term “knowingly” means that Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person
charged knew that they were prohibited from driving. However, service of a prohibition certificate by
charged knew that they were prohibited from driving. However, service of a prohibition certificate by
Line 21: Line 21:




It is advisable that individuals charged with Driving While Prohibited seek out legal advice from a lawyer. It is possible to work out a plea deal with the Crown Counsel to a lesser included offence of Driving Without a Licence pursuant to s. 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The benefit of this resolution is that:
It is advisable that individuals charged with Driving While Prohibited seek out legal advice from a lawyer. It is possible to work out a plea deal with the Crown Counsel to a lesser included offence of Driving Without a Licence pursuant to s. 24(1) of the ''Motor Vehicle Act''. The benefit of this resolution is that:
* There is no statutory minimum driving prohibition;
* There is no statutory minimum driving prohibition;
* No minimum fine amount; and
* No minimum fine amount; and
* The individuals driving record will only be blemished with a 3 point Motor Vehicle Act infraction on their record.
* The individuals driving record will only be blemished with a 3 point ''Motor Vehicle Act'' infraction on their record.

Revision as of 02:17, 25 November 2018

It is an offense under Motor Vehicle Act s 95(1)(a) for an individual to drive a motor vehicle on a highway or industrial road knowing that he or she is prohibited from doing so under:

  • ss 91 (prohibition issued by the Insurance Corporation of British Columbia for an unsatisfied court judgment),
  • 92 (prohibition against driving relating to fitness or ability to drive),
  • 93 (prohibition issued by Superintendent in the public interest),
  • 94.2 (driving prohibition for driving while impaired by alcohol or refusing to provide a breath sample without reasonable excuse),
  • 215 (24 hour impaired driving prohibition),
  • 215.43 (immediate roadside driving prohibition), or
  • 251(4) (prohibition for driving while failing to hold a license, or while an impoundment notice was issued on the license),

Then the person commits an offence and is liable:

  • on a first conviction, to a fine of not less than $500 and not more than $2 000 or to imprisonment for not more than 6 months, or to both, and
  • on a subsequent conviction, regardless of when the contravention occurred, to a fine of not less

than $500 and not more than $2 000 and to imprisonment for not less than 14 days and not more than one year.

  • The individuals driving record will also be blemished and they will receive a 10 point Motor Vehicle Act infraction on their record.

The term “knowingly” means that Crown must prove beyond a reasonable doubt that the person charged knew that they were prohibited from driving. However, service of a prohibition certificate by registered mail, per Motor Vehicle Act s 95(4)(a) constitutes constructive knowledge, even in cases where the accused never reads the driving prohibition: R. v. Wall, 2010 CarswellBC 3398, 2010 BCPC 316.


It is advisable that individuals charged with Driving While Prohibited seek out legal advice from a lawyer. It is possible to work out a plea deal with the Crown Counsel to a lesser included offence of Driving Without a Licence pursuant to s. 24(1) of the Motor Vehicle Act. The benefit of this resolution is that:

  • There is no statutory minimum driving prohibition;
  • No minimum fine amount; and
  • The individuals driving record will only be blemished with a 3 point Motor Vehicle Act infraction on their record.