Difference between revisions of "Strata Dispute Resolution (22:XV)"
Jump to navigation
Jump to search
Line 36: | Line 36: | ||
!Significantly Unfair? | !Significantly Unfair? | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Reid v Strata Plan LMS 2503, 2001 BCSC 1578 | |[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2001/2001bcsc1578/2001bcsc1578.html ''Reid v Strata Plan LMS 2503 (Owners)'', 2001 BCSC 1578] | ||
|Strata council resolution giving the owners permission to place planters, etc. on common property patio not significantly unfair to owner whose windows looked over area | |Strata council resolution giving the owners permission to place planters, etc. on common property patio not significantly unfair to owner whose windows looked over area | ||
|No | |No | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Als v Strata | |[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2002/2002bcsc134/2002bcsc134.html ''Als v Strata Corporation NW 1067'', 2002 BCSC 134] | ||
|Strata council refused permission to rent strata lot; not significantly unfair | |Strata council refused permission to rent strata lot; not significantly unfair | ||
|No | |No | ||
|- | |- | ||
|Strata Plan | |[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2002/2002bcsc381/2002bcsc381.html ''Strata Plan VR1767 (Owners) v Steven Estate Ltd'', 2002 BCSC 381] | ||
|Assessment of contribution to costs of building envelope repair based on erroneous unit entitlement registered at the land titles office in the strata plan is significantly unfair | |Assessment of contribution to costs of building envelope repair based on erroneous unit entitlement registered at the land titles office in the strata plan is significantly unfair | ||
|Yes | |Yes | ||
|- | |- | ||
|McGowan v Strata Plan | |[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcsc/doc/2002/2002bcsc673/2002bcsc673.html ''McGowan v Strata Plan NW1018 (Owners)'', 2002 BCSC 673] | ||
|Bylaw allowing balcony enclosure; different treatment of some owners justified by safety issues | |Bylaw allowing balcony enclosure; different treatment of some owners justified by safety issues | ||
|No | |No |
Revision as of 05:53, 20 August 2023
This information applies to British Columbia, Canada. Last reviewed for legal accuracy by the Law Students' Legal Advice Program on July 24, 2023. |
B. Section 164 - Significantly Unfair Acts
6. Cases Decided under Section 164
A few examples of cases decided under s 164 include:
Name of Case | Issue | Significantly Unfair? |
---|---|---|
Reid v Strata Plan LMS 2503 (Owners), 2001 BCSC 1578 | Strata council resolution giving the owners permission to place planters, etc. on common property patio not significantly unfair to owner whose windows looked over area | No |
Als v Strata Corporation NW 1067, 2002 BCSC 134 | Strata council refused permission to rent strata lot; not significantly unfair | No |
Strata Plan VR1767 (Owners) v Steven Estate Ltd, 2002 BCSC 381 | Assessment of contribution to costs of building envelope repair based on erroneous unit entitlement registered at the land titles office in the strata plan is significantly unfair | Yes |
McGowan v Strata Plan NW1018 (Owners), 2002 BCSC 673 | Bylaw allowing balcony enclosure; different treatment of some owners justified by safety issues | No |
© Copyright 2023, The Greater Vancouver Law Students' Legal Advice Society. |