5,483
edits
Desy Wahyuni (talk | contribs) m |
|||
Line 9: | Line 9: | ||
If however, the cause of action occurred prior to the coming into force of the revised ''Limitation Act'', the previous limitation periods remain in effect. Therefore, if the debtor’s acknowledgement in writing of the cause of action, or the last payment on the debt occurred prior to June 1, 2013, then the limitation period for the commencement of proceedings for the collection of debt is 6 years from that time. | If however, the cause of action occurred prior to the coming into force of the revised ''Limitation Act'', the previous limitation periods remain in effect. Therefore, if the debtor’s acknowledgement in writing of the cause of action, or the last payment on the debt occurred prior to June 1, 2013, then the limitation period for the commencement of proceedings for the collection of debt is 6 years from that time. | ||
'''NOTE:''' The limitation period does not apply to claims exempted under sections 3 or 7. | :'''NOTE:''' The limitation period does not apply to claims exempted under sections 3 or 7. | ||
== A. Secured Creditors == | == A. Secured Creditors == | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
For agreements that are subject to the ''PPSA'', Part 5 of the ''PPSA'' outlines the creditor’s remedies (ss 56 - Rights and remedies, 57 - Collection of payments under intangibles or chattel paper, 58 – Right of seizure or repossession, and 67 - Rights and remedies: consumer goods). For agreements that involve fixtures, crops or accessions, ss 36 – 38 apply. In addition, Part 6 contains some sections (i.e. ss 68(2) - Good faith and commercially reasonable, and 72 - Notice) that are of procedural importance. | For agreements that are subject to the ''PPSA'', Part 5 of the ''PPSA'' outlines the creditor’s remedies (ss 56 - Rights and remedies, 57 - Collection of payments under intangibles or chattel paper, 58 – Right of seizure or repossession, and 67 - Rights and remedies: consumer goods). For agreements that involve fixtures, crops or accessions, ss 36 – 38 apply. In addition, Part 6 contains some sections (i.e. ss 68(2) - Good faith and commercially reasonable, and 72 - Notice) that are of procedural importance. | ||
'''NOTE:''' ''PPSA'' issues, particularly those involving priority disputes or matters relating to the transitional provisions, are complex and may have to be referred to a lawyer. | :'''NOTE:''' ''PPSA'' issues, particularly those involving priority disputes or matters relating to the transitional provisions, are complex and may have to be referred to a lawyer. | ||
=== 3. What Does the PPSA Govern? === | === 3. What Does the PPSA Govern? === | ||
Line 29: | Line 29: | ||
The scope of the ''PPSA'' is defined in s 2 as including every transaction that in substance creates a security interest without regard to its form. As well, under s 3, a transaction involving either a transfer of an account or chattel paper, a commercial consignment, or a lease for a term of more than one year that does not secure payment or performance of an obligation (i.e. does not create a security interest) is subject to the ''PPSA''. Section 55 provides that Part 5 does not apply to transactions brought within the ''PPSA'' by s 3. It is necessary to look to the terms and the common law. | The scope of the ''PPSA'' is defined in s 2 as including every transaction that in substance creates a security interest without regard to its form. As well, under s 3, a transaction involving either a transfer of an account or chattel paper, a commercial consignment, or a lease for a term of more than one year that does not secure payment or performance of an obligation (i.e. does not create a security interest) is subject to the ''PPSA''. Section 55 provides that Part 5 does not apply to transactions brought within the ''PPSA'' by s 3. It is necessary to look to the terms and the common law. | ||
'''NOTE:''' Section 4 lists types of transactions that are exempt from the ''PPSA''. The ''PPSA'' does not apply to a “lien, charge or other interest given by a rule of law or an enactment unless the enactment contains an express provision that the ''PPSA'' applies”. Generally this excludes real property and natural resources. | :'''NOTE:''' Section 4 lists types of transactions that are exempt from the ''PPSA''. The ''PPSA'' does not apply to a “lien, charge or other interest given by a rule of law or an enactment unless the enactment contains an express provision that the ''PPSA'' applies”. Generally this excludes real property and natural resources. | ||
==== a) Perfection ==== | ==== a) Perfection ==== | ||
Line 72: | Line 72: | ||
=== 8. Notice of Intention to Dispose of Collateral === | === 8. Notice of Intention to Dispose of Collateral === | ||
'''NOTE:''' The forms of notices under the ''PPSA'' depend on a number of factors, including the nature of the security and the terms of the security agreement. Advice concerning the validity of notices should be referred to a lawyer. | :'''NOTE:''' The forms of notices under the ''PPSA'' depend on a number of factors, including the nature of the security and the terms of the security agreement. Advice concerning the validity of notices should be referred to a lawyer. | ||
Subject to the circumstances where notice is not required as per s 59(17) (e.g. for perishable collateral, collateral requiring disproportionately high storage costs relative to its value, etc.), the requirements for notice are outlined in ss 59(6) and (10). These sections require that the secured party, or receiver, as the case may be, must provide at least '''20 days’''' notice of their intention to dispose of the collateral to parties including the debtor and any other creditor. | Subject to the circumstances where notice is not required as per s 59(17) (e.g. for perishable collateral, collateral requiring disproportionately high storage costs relative to its value, etc.), the requirements for notice are outlined in ss 59(6) and (10). These sections require that the secured party, or receiver, as the case may be, must provide at least '''20 days’''' notice of their intention to dispose of the collateral to parties including the debtor and any other creditor. | ||
Line 106: | Line 106: | ||
Under s 60(5), the debtor is responsible for any deficiency balance unless the secured party and the debtor have agreed otherwise and made provisionsas such in the security agreement. | Under s 60(5), the debtor is responsible for any deficiency balance unless the secured party and the debtor have agreed otherwise and made provisionsas such in the security agreement. | ||
'''NOTE:''' This section does not apply to consumer goods. | :'''NOTE:''' This section does not apply to consumer goods. | ||
=== 10. Voluntary Foreclosure === | === 10. Voluntary Foreclosure === | ||
Line 177: | Line 177: | ||
*the secured party discovers after seizure that an accession that was collateral has been removed and not replaced by other goods of equivalent value and free from prior security interests, a claim may be advanced against the debtor for the value of the accession (s 67(8)). | *the secured party discovers after seizure that an accession that was collateral has been removed and not replaced by other goods of equivalent value and free from prior security interests, a claim may be advanced against the debtor for the value of the accession (s 67(8)). | ||
'''NOTE:''' The “seize or sue” rule does not apply to “true leases” but will apply to “security leases” or “conditional sales agreements”. BC courts have been developing tests to distinguish between true leases and security leases. Disputes often arise over car leases. Creditors and debtors should consult with a lawyer who is familiar with this area of law when trying to figure out whether their contract is a true lease or a security lease. If the lease is a true lease the creditor has the option to seize and sue; see ''Daimler Chrysler Services Canada Inc v Cameron'', 2007 BCCA 144. | :'''NOTE:''' The “seize or sue” rule does not apply to “true leases” but will apply to “security leases” or “conditional sales agreements”. BC courts have been developing tests to distinguish between true leases and security leases. Disputes often arise over car leases. Creditors and debtors should consult with a lawyer who is familiar with this area of law when trying to figure out whether their contract is a true lease or a security lease. If the lease is a true lease the creditor has the option to seize and sue; see ''Daimler Chrysler Services Canada Inc v Cameron'', 2007 BCCA 144. | ||
==== c) Consequences of Electing to Proceed Against Collateral ==== | ==== c) Consequences of Electing to Proceed Against Collateral ==== | ||
Line 207: | Line 207: | ||
Exceptions to this principle of pro rata distribution allow preference to sheriff’s costs, costs to the creditor at whose instance the seizure and levy was made, and wage claims that do not exceed three month’s wages, or salary. Further, the ''Family Maintenance Enforcement Act'', RSBC 1996, c 127 provides that proceeds realized on execution under that Act are not subject to distribution under the ''Creditor Assistance Act''. In addition, some statutory liens and charges may take priority over the rateable distribution under the Act. | Exceptions to this principle of pro rata distribution allow preference to sheriff’s costs, costs to the creditor at whose instance the seizure and levy was made, and wage claims that do not exceed three month’s wages, or salary. Further, the ''Family Maintenance Enforcement Act'', RSBC 1996, c 127 provides that proceeds realized on execution under that Act are not subject to distribution under the ''Creditor Assistance Act''. In addition, some statutory liens and charges may take priority over the rateable distribution under the Act. | ||
'''NOTE:''' Payments made pursuant to a foreclosure sale of land will be made in the order that judgments are registered at the Land Title Office, and not on a pro rata basis. | :'''NOTE:''' Payments made pursuant to a foreclosure sale of land will be made in the order that judgments are registered at the Land Title Office, and not on a pro rata basis. | ||
==== a) Money to be Levied by Execution ==== | ==== a) Money to be Levied by Execution ==== | ||
Line 240: | Line 240: | ||
A “maintenance debtor” has the same meaning as a “debtor” in s 1(1) of the ''Family Maintenance Enforcement Act''. | A “maintenance debtor” has the same meaning as a “debtor” in s 1(1) of the ''Family Maintenance Enforcement Act''. | ||
'''NOTE:''' Refer to BC Reg 28/98 (Court Order Enforcement Exemption Regulations) for further details regarding exemptions under the ''COEA''. Where there are competing priority interests between judgment creditors and secured parties, each party should seek the assistance of counsel. | :'''NOTE:''' Refer to BC Reg 28/98 (Court Order Enforcement Exemption Regulations) for further details regarding exemptions under the ''COEA''. Where there are competing priority interests between judgment creditors and secured parties, each party should seek the assistance of counsel. | ||
'''NOTE:''' The execution remedy is available to an unsecured creditor only after they have obtained judgment against the debtor. | :'''NOTE:''' The execution remedy is available to an unsecured creditor only after they have obtained judgment against the debtor. | ||
'''NOTE:''' The B.C. Court of Appeal decision in ''Atwal (Re)'', 2012 BCCA 46 confirmed that a debtor whose property is sold by a trustee under the ''Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act'' [''BIA''] is entitled to the above exemptions if the value of their property exceeds that which is prescribed in the legislation. Thus, if a debtor’s vehicle, valued in excess of $5000 is sold by a trustee in bankruptcy, the debtor is entitled to $5000 of the sale price, as provided by the exemption. Seizure under Execution | :'''NOTE:''' The B.C. Court of Appeal decision in ''Atwal (Re)'', 2012 BCCA 46 confirmed that a debtor whose property is sold by a trustee under the ''Bankruptcy and Insolvency Act'' [''BIA''] is entitled to the above exemptions if the value of their property exceeds that which is prescribed in the legislation. Thus, if a debtor’s vehicle, valued in excess of $5000 is sold by a trustee in bankruptcy, the debtor is entitled to $5000 of the sale price, as provided by the exemption. Seizure under Execution | ||
Any goods, chattels and effects of the judgment debtor (''COEA'', s 55), money, bank notes, cheques, or other securities for money, such as shares of an incorporated company in British Columbia (s 64; ''Peligren v Ajac’s Equipment'' (1982) Inc (1984), 56 BCLR 17, [1984] 5 WWR 563 (SC)), and any legal or equitable present, future, executory or contingent interest in land (s 81) may be seized after the exemptions from s 71(1) of the ''COEA'' are applied. | Any goods, chattels and effects of the judgment debtor (''COEA'', s 55), money, bank notes, cheques, or other securities for money, such as shares of an incorporated company in British Columbia (s 64; ''Peligren v Ajac’s Equipment'' (1982) Inc (1984), 56 BCLR 17, [1984] 5 WWR 563 (SC)), and any legal or equitable present, future, executory or contingent interest in land (s 81) may be seized after the exemptions from s 71(1) of the ''COEA'' are applied. | ||
Line 269: | Line 269: | ||
==== b) Execution Procedure: Land ==== | ==== b) Execution Procedure: Land ==== | ||
'''NOTE:''' Issues relating to land should be referred to a lawyer. | :'''NOTE:''' Issues relating to land should be referred to a lawyer. | ||
If the judgment creditor registers a judgment in any Land Title Office, a lien is created against the interest in the real property of the judgment debtor that is registered in the land registration district in which the judgment is registered (s 82). Once a lien is formed, the judgment creditor may seek a court order to have the sheriff sell the land (ss 92 and 96), unless the land is held in joint ownership and the debt is in one party’s name only. In that case, an application must be brought for partition and sale of the property. The execution procedure, however, is slow and potentially expensive. '''The judgment creditor must renew the judgment after two years or it is extinguished''', unless it is a non-expiring judgment (i.e. a judgment registered under the ''Family Maintenance Enforcement Act''). | If the judgment creditor registers a judgment in any Land Title Office, a lien is created against the interest in the real property of the judgment debtor that is registered in the land registration district in which the judgment is registered (s 82). Once a lien is formed, the judgment creditor may seek a court order to have the sheriff sell the land (ss 92 and 96), unless the land is held in joint ownership and the debt is in one party’s name only. In that case, an application must be brought for partition and sale of the property. The execution procedure, however, is slow and potentially expensive. '''The judgment creditor must renew the judgment after two years or it is extinguished''', unless it is a non-expiring judgment (i.e. a judgment registered under the ''Family Maintenance Enforcement Act''). | ||
'''NOTE: Where there is a conflict between the ''PPSA'' and the ''Land Title Act'', the ''Land Title Act'' prevails (''PPSA'', s 74).''' | :'''NOTE: Where there is a conflict between the ''PPSA'' and the ''Land Title Act'', the ''Land Title Act'' prevails (''PPSA'', s 74).''' | ||
==== c) Legal Advice on Execution Orders ==== | ==== c) Legal Advice on Execution Orders ==== | ||
Line 366: | Line 366: | ||
=== 1. Liens on Land (Builder’s Liens) === | === 1. Liens on Land (Builder’s Liens) === | ||
'''NOTE:''' Builder’s lien issues involve limitation periods and real property registrations and filings. The '''time limitations are extremely strict'''; solicitors have been known to lose suits because they filed a day late. '''All cases should be referred to a lawyer.''' Refer to: ''Builder’s Lien Act'', SBC 1997, c 45. | :'''NOTE:''' Builder’s lien issues involve limitation periods and real property registrations and filings. The '''time limitations are extremely strict'''; solicitors have been known to lose suits because they filed a day late. '''All cases should be referred to a lawyer.''' Refer to: ''Builder’s Lien Act'', SBC 1997, c 45. | ||
Under the current ''Builder’s Lien Act'', a worker, material supplier, contractor, or sub-contractor who does or causes to be done any work upon, or supplies material, or both, for an improvement, has a lien for the price of the work and material, upon the interest of the owner in the improvement, upon the improvement itself, upon the material delivered to the land, and upon the land itself (s 2). “Price” does not include interest on outstanding accounts: see ''Horseman Bros. Holdings Ltd v Lee'' (1985), 12 CLR 145 (BCCA). | Under the current ''Builder’s Lien Act'', a worker, material supplier, contractor, or sub-contractor who does or causes to be done any work upon, or supplies material, or both, for an improvement, has a lien for the price of the work and material, upon the interest of the owner in the improvement, upon the improvement itself, upon the material delivered to the land, and upon the land itself (s 2). “Price” does not include interest on outstanding accounts: see ''Horseman Bros. Holdings Ltd v Lee'' (1985), 12 CLR 145 (BCCA). | ||
Line 424: | Line 424: | ||
If the lien is valid and the debtor wishes to discharge the lien, but disputes the amount of the claim, the debtor may wish to make the payment to the lien-holder. The debtor should send an accompanying letter stating an intention to dispute the claim, and if they are required to sign documents acknowledging indebtedness before the chattels will be released, they should write the words “Without Prejudice” above the signature. In every case, the debtor should always ensure that the proper steps have been taken to discharge the lien upon payment. | If the lien is valid and the debtor wishes to discharge the lien, but disputes the amount of the claim, the debtor may wish to make the payment to the lien-holder. The debtor should send an accompanying letter stating an intention to dispute the claim, and if they are required to sign documents acknowledging indebtedness before the chattels will be released, they should write the words “Without Prejudice” above the signature. In every case, the debtor should always ensure that the proper steps have been taken to discharge the lien upon payment. | ||
{{LSLAP Manual Navbox|type=chapters8-14}} |