Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "The Right to Vote (5:VII)"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Line 75: Line 75:
The rules and regulations governing federal elections are set out in the ''Canada Elections Act'', RSC 2000, c 9, and its subsequent  amendments. Many of these rules and regulations are similar to those applicable to BC provincial elections discussed above. A brief survey of  the federal Act is included below.  
The rules and regulations governing federal elections are set out in the ''Canada Elections Act'', RSC 2000, c 9, and its subsequent  amendments. Many of these rules and regulations are similar to those applicable to BC provincial elections discussed above. A brief survey of  the federal Act is included below.  


Canadian citizens who are 18 years of age or older on election day are generally eligible to vote in federal elections (s 3). Under the  statute, persons can be disqualified from voting for a variety of reasons (e.g., for incarceration or for corrupt or illegal practices).  
Canadian citizens who are 18 years of age or older on election day are generally eligible to vote in federal elections (s 3).  


However, the Supreme Court of Canada struck down the prohibition preventing inmates from voting in ''Sauve v Canada (Chief Electoral Officer)'', 2002 SCC 68. A key consideration in this decision was that, by denying the vote to all prisoners, the Act failed to balance the right to vote against the seriousness of the conduct of prisoners. The Federal Court of Canada has held that people with mental disabilities do have the right to vote: see ''Canadian Disability Rights Council v Canada'', [1988] 3 FC 622.  
The Federal Court of Canada has held that people with mental disabilities do have the right to vote: see ''Canadian Disability Rights Council v Canada'', [1988] 3 FC 622.  


While federal residency requirements do exist, they are more relaxed than those applicable to BC provincial elections. A person may vote only  once, in the area in which she is “ordinarily resident”. This is defined in much the same way as “resident” is defined in section 32 of BC’s ''Election Act''. A person who moves between the enumerator’s visit and the day of the election could be forced to vote in the former riding if ordinarily resident there when the enumeration occurred.  
While federal residency requirements do exist, they are more relaxed than those applicable to BC provincial elections. A person may vote only  once, in the area in which they are “ordinarily resident”. This is defined in much the same way as “resident” is defined in section 32 of BC’s ''Election Act''. A person who moves between the enumerator’s visit and the day of the election could be forced to vote in the former riding if ordinarily resident there when the enumeration occurred.


Provisions of the ''Canada Elections Act'' deny the vote to most citizens who have resided outside of Canada for more than five years. The Ontario Court of Appeal’s decision in ''Frank v Canada (Attorney General)'', 2019 SCC 1 confirmed that Canadian citizens who have resided outside of Canada for five or more years are generally not permitted to participate in Canadian elections. To regain the right to vote, these citizens must return to live in Canada.
All voters must present one piece of government-issued ID with a photograph and residential address before being allowed to vote. If a voter cannot provide the required photo ID, they may still be allowed to vote if they do one of two things (s 143):  
 
All voters must present one piece of government-issued ID with a photograph and residential address before being allowed to vote. If a voter cannot provide the required photo ID, he or she may still be allowed to vote if he or she does one of two things (s 143):  
#provides two pieces of acceptable identification to establish the voter's identity, at least one of which establishes the voter’s residence (a list of “acceptable identification” is to be published by the Chief Electoral Officer); or   
#provides two pieces of acceptable identification to establish the voter's identity, at least one of which establishes the voter’s residence (a list of “acceptable identification” is to be published by the Chief Electoral Officer); or   
#provides two pieces of identification that establishes the voter's name, and then establishes his or her residence by swearing an oath in  writing that attests to where they live. The voter must also be accompanied by an individual who is '''registered to vote in the same polling division''', has '''proper identification''', and vouches for the person without ID under oath and in the prescribed form. An individual can only vouch for one person at an election, and an individual who has been vouched for cannot vouch for someone else.   
#provides two pieces of identification that establishes the voter's name, and then establishes their residence by swearing an oath in  writing that attests to where they live. The voter must also be accompanied by an individual who is '''registered to vote in the same polling division''', has '''proper identification''', and vouches for the person without ID under oath and in the prescribed form. An individual can only vouch for one person at an election, and an individual who has been vouched for cannot vouch for someone else.   


These requirements pose significant challenges to low-income individuals who may have no form of official identification. Further difficulties are created by the rule that an individual may only vouch for one other individual and the requirement that the voucher lives and is on the elector’s list in the same polling station as the intended vouchee.   
These requirements pose significant challenges to low-income individuals who may have no form of official identification. Further difficulties are created by the rule that an individual may only vouch for one other individual and the requirement that the voucher lives and is on the elector’s list in the same polling station as the intended vouchee.   


The provisions relating to vouching, as described above, were brought into force by the ''Fair Elections Act'' on December 2014.  Under the new provisions, voters who have identification but cannot prove residence will be allowed to sign an oath attesting to where they live, which must then be corroborated by the oath of another voter.  However, this leaves voters who have no identification whatsoever with little recourse.  This controversial measure could significantly inhibit the ability of low-income citizens and students to vote.   
The provisions relating to vouching, as described above, were brought into force by the ''Fair Elections Act'' in December 2014.  Under the new provisions, voters who have identification but cannot prove residence will be allowed to sign an oath attesting to where they live, which must then be corroborated by the oath of another voter.  However, this leaves voters who have no identification whatsoever with little recourse.  This controversial measure could significantly inhibit the ability of low-income citizens and students to vote.   


The constitutionality of these requirements was challenged in the British Columbia Supreme Court and the BC Court of Appeal in ''Henry v Canada (Attorney General)'', 2014 BCCA 30. In that case, the court found that the legislation was inconsistent with the electoral rights guaranteed in section 3 of the ''Charter'', but constituted a reasonable limit prescribed by law and was demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society under section 1 of the ''Charter''. In Ontario, the Council of Canadians and the Canadian Federation of Students have challenged this legislation in the Ontario Superior Court on the grounds that it violates section 3 of the ''Charter''.
The constitutionality of these requirements was challenged in the British Columbia Supreme Court and the BC Court of Appeal in ''[https://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2014/2014bcca30/2014bcca30.html?autocompleteStr=Henry%20v%20Canada%20(Attorney%20General)%2C%202014%20BCCA%2030&autocompletePos=1 Henry v Canada (Attorney General)]'', 2014 BCCA 30. In that case, the court found that the legislation was inconsistent with the electoral rights guaranteed in section 3 of the ''Charter'', but constituted a reasonable limit prescribed by law and was demonstrably justifiable in a free and democratic society under section 1 of the ''Charter''. In Ontario, the Council of Canadians and the Canadian Federation of Students have challenged this legislation in the Ontario Superior Court on the grounds that it violates section 3 of the ''Charter''.


Many other provisions of the ''Canada Elections Act'', such as an employee being entitled to receive time off work to cast a ballot,  provisions for people with disabilities, and balloting procedures are very similar to BC provincial regulations and thus are not repeated here. Further inquiries can be sent to Marc Mayrand, the current Chief Electoral Officer, at:  
Many other provisions of the ''Canada Elections Act'', such as an employee being entitled to receive time off work to cast a ballot,  provisions for people with disabilities, and balloting procedures are very similar to BC provincial regulations and thus are not repeated here. Further inquiries can be sent to Marc Mayrand, the current Chief Electoral Officer, at:  
Line 98: Line 96:


{{ResourcesLSLAP
{{ResourcesLSLAP
| address = Chief Electoral Officer <br /> 257 Slater Street <br /> Ottawa, Ontario K1A OM6  
| address = 350 Victoria Street <br /> Gatineau, Quebec K1A OM6  
| phone = 1-800-463-6868  
| phone = 1-800-463-6868  
| online = [http://www.elections.ca Website]
| online = [http://www.elections.ca Website]
5,109

edits