5,109
edits
Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
=== 4. Restitution === | === 4. Restitution === | ||
The law of restitution applies to circumstances where a party has benefited, the other party has suffered a loss as a result, and there is no legal basis for the party to have benefited ([http://canlii.ca/t/1gzjn ''Garland v Consumers' Gas Co.'', 2004 SCC 25]; | The law of restitution applies to circumstances where a party has benefited, the other party has suffered a loss as a result, and there is no legal basis for the party to have benefited ([http://canlii.ca/t/1gzjn ''Garland v Consumers' Gas Co.'', 2004 SCC 25];[http://canlii.ca/t/2fs3h ''Kerr v Baranow'', 2011 SCC 10]; [http://canlii.ca/t/fpm5g ''Skibinski v Community Living British Columbia'', 2012 BCCA 17]). The type of claim commonly pursued for a restitution remedy is referred to as “unjust enrichment” and is a complicated and evolving area of the law. A party planning to attain a restitution remedy should consult a lawyer, research what must be proved to be successful and which defences may be available to the defendant. Resources include CanLII.org, the courthouse library, and a practicing lawyer. | ||
=== 5. Statute === | === 5. Statute === |
edits