Difference between revisions of "Protecting Property and Debt in Family Law Matters"

Protecting Property and Debt in Family Law Matters (view source)

1 byte added , 22:15, 3 April 2013

7,381

edits

@@ Line 89: / Line 89: @@
 Rule 12-4 of the [http://canlii.ca/t/8mcr Supreme Court Family Rules] gives the court the authority to make a general restraining order, also called an ''injunction'', to make someone to do something or not do something. The potential scope of these restraining orders is very broad, and can include, for example, a restraining order identical to that provided for in s. 91 of the ''Family Law Act'' as well as an order stopping someone from racking up debt by drawing on credit cards and lines of credit.
-Rule 12-4 says little more that "the court can issue an injunction." A 1986 case of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, ''{http://canlii.ca/t/1q5c1 British Columbia v. Wale]'', 1986 CanLII 171 (BCCA) offers some guidance. In that case, the court held that someone applying for an injunction had to prove three things. In a family law context involving unmarried parties, these are that:
+Rule 12-4 says little more that "the court can issue an injunction." A 1986 case of the British Columbia Court of Appeal, ''[{http://canlii.ca/t/1q5c1 British Columbia v. Wale]'', 1986 CanLII 171 (BCCA) offers some guidance. In that case, the court held that someone applying for an injunction had to prove three things. In a family law context involving unmarried parties, these are that:
 #you have a reasonable claim against assets owned by your spouse,