Anonymous

Difference between revisions of "I've Been Cut off Workers' Compensation Benefits"

From Clicklaw Wikibooks
Line 28: Line 28:
If your review involves a medical issue, such as whether you are able to return to work, ask your doctor to write to the Board. Most successful reviews are based on new medical evidence.
If your review involves a medical issue, such as whether you are able to return to work, ask your doctor to write to the Board. Most successful reviews are based on new medical evidence.


Your review may also involve a policy issue. The WCB's policy manual, which is nearly 800 pages long, has the force of law, and there are detailed policies about almost every aspect of the claims process. You can read or download the "[http://www.worksafebc.com/publications/policy_manuals/Rehabilitation_Services_and_Claims_Manual/default.asp Rehabilitation Services and Claims Manual]" from the WCB's website.   
Your review may also involve a policy issue. The WCB's policy manual, which is nearly 800 pages long, has the force of law, and there are detailed policies about almost every aspect of the claims process. You can read or download the [http://www.worksafebc.com/publications/policy_manuals/Rehabilitation_Services_and_Claims_Manual/default.asp ''Rehabilitation Services and Claims Manual''] from the WCB's website.   


The Review Officer <span class="noglossary">will</span> give you a deadline for sending in any new information or arguments. If you need more time, ask for it. Make sure that you tell the Review Officer about any wrong information in the file, whether it's from a WCB doctor, your employer, or anyone else, and that you explain why the Board's <span class="noglossary">decision</span> was wrong.   
The Review Officer <span class="noglossary">will</span> give you a deadline for sending in any new information or arguments. If you need more time, ask for it. Make sure that you tell the Review Officer about any wrong information in the file, whether it's from a WCB doctor, your employer, or anyone else, and that you explain why the Board's <span class="noglossary">decision</span> was wrong.   
9,075

edits