Difference between revisions of "Tenancy Agreements (19:II)"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 50: Line 50:
“Agreements for tenancy” are executory contracts in which the lessor promises that he or she and the lessee will enter into a written tenancy agreement at  a later date. For an executory contract to have effect, generally the agreement must be in writing and must contain the essential elements of a lease. While the law states that the agreement must be in writing, this requirement is not always enforced. Consequently oral agreements may be considered valid. Also, the payment of money may point to the fact that a contract has been entered into. It should be noted that since this is simply an agreement to agree,  the RTA does not yet apply. At this point, any money paid is a processing fee, holding deposit, or administration fee. Section 15 of the RTA prohibits  fees to consider or process an application for tenancy.  
“Agreements for tenancy” are executory contracts in which the lessor promises that he or she and the lessee will enter into a written tenancy agreement at  a later date. For an executory contract to have effect, generally the agreement must be in writing and must contain the essential elements of a lease. While the law states that the agreement must be in writing, this requirement is not always enforced. Consequently oral agreements may be considered valid. Also, the payment of money may point to the fact that a contract has been entered into. It should be noted that since this is simply an agreement to agree,  the RTA does not yet apply. At this point, any money paid is a processing fee, holding deposit, or administration fee. Section 15 of the RTA prohibits  fees to consider or process an application for tenancy.  


If the money paid is part payment of rent or the security deposit (as distinct from a processing fee, holding deposit or administration fee), it is important to clearly identify that on the receipt at the time of payment (see definition of a security deposit). Until the tenant comes into possession,  he or she has only a contractual interest, which applies only to “tenancy agreements”. Thus, failure to give the tenant possession is a breach of contract and not a violation of a property interest or breach of a tenancy covenant. When the tenant acquires possession, the agreement for lease is treated as a  lease agreement, and the court may order the lessor to execute a lease (specific performance): see ''Horse and Carriage Inn Ltd. v. Baron'', [1975] 53 DLR (3d) 426 (BCSC). Recording the initial exchange of money as “rent”or as “security deposit” is important to create a basic tenancy agreement in situations where
If the money paid is part payment of rent or the security deposit (as distinct from a processing fee, holding deposit or administration fee), it is important to clearly identify that on the receipt at the time of payment (see definition of a security deposit). Until the tenant comes into possession,  he or she has only a contractual interest, which applies only to “tenancy agreements”. Thus, failure to give the tenant possession is a breach of contract and not a violation of a property interest or breach of a tenancy covenant. When the tenant acquires possession, the agreement for lease is treated as a  lease agreement, and the court may order the lessor to execute a lease (specific performance): see ''Horse and Carriage Inn Ltd. v. Baron'', [1975] 53 DLR (3d) 426 (BCSC). Recording the initial exchange of money as “rent”or as “security deposit” is important to create a basic tenancy agreement in situations where there is only an “agreement to agree” in place, and where the tenant is not yet in possession of the rental unit.
 
== C. Contractual Nature of the Tenancy Agreement ==
 
=== 1. Freedom of Contract and the Agreement ===
 
Throughout the establishment and duration of the agreement, the parties are generally free to add and alter the terms, covenants and conditions as they see fit – subject to restrictions imposed by common law and statute (e.g. prohibition of contracts for an illegal purpose, '''unconscionable terms''', or contracts  in  restraint  of  trade).  The  RTA  and  MHPTA  both restrict parties from contracting out of requirements of those Acts and from adopting terms that are contrary to the Acts. The changes in the tenancy agreement must be in writing, and be  signed  and  dated  by  both  parties.  Some  requirements,  such  as  locks  on  doors,  are automatically  included  in  every  tenancy  agreement  even  if  the  tenancy  agreement  does  not specifically  mention  them.  A  unilaterally  altered  or newly  included  term  may  be unenforceable where there is no consideration for it. a)Collateral Contract The  parties  may  enter  into  additional  or  subsequent  oral or  written  contracts, separate from the tenancy agreement, that involve a change in the way the terms of the tenancy agreement are carried out (e.g. agreement by the tenant to do repairs in return for  paying  a  reduced  amount  of  rent). The  terms  of  the  tenancy  agreement still exist; they must be performed as stipulated when the collateral contract is fully performed  or  is  otherwise  terminated  (e.g.  one  party  dies  or  goes  away).  If  an Arbitrator determines the terms are reasonable and not unconscionable, as defined within s 3 of the RTR, any purchaser of the reversion will be bound by the former owner’ s  collateral  contract.  A  remedy  for  the  new  landlord  would  be  found  in  an action  against  the  seller.  Generally  speaking,  oral  collateral  contracts  are  hard  to prove. If something is important, it should be recorded in writing. 2.Terms, Covenants, and Conditions a)Covenants and Conditions A covenant in a tenancy agreement consists of a promise by a person that a certain thing must or must not be done (the RTA eliminates the word “covenant” and uses the more modern word “term”). A “Material Term”, as used in the RTA, is a term going  to  the  root  of  the  relationship  and  the  tenancy  agreement.  Landlords  and tenants  may  agree  to  any  term  they  wish,  as  long  as  it  is  not  unconscionable  or contrary  to  the RTA.  Terms  contrary  to  the RTA  may  not  be  identified  in  some cases until  dispute  resolution,  and  a  tenant is free  to  argue  that  a  term violates  the RTA and should therefore be void. The Arbitrator will take this into consideration when  determining  reasonableness.  For  more  information, see  RTB  Policy Guidelines 8: Unconscionable and Material Terms. A  condition  creates  an  obligation  that  arises  in  the  event  a  certain  thing  does  or does  not  happen. “Conditions  precedent”  are  conditions  that  must  be  performed or  satisfied  before  other  obligations  arise. “Conditions  subsequent”  cause  existing obligations to cease when the conditions subsequent occur or are satisfied. b)Express, Implied and Statutory Terms

Navigation menu