Difference between revisions of "Children and Parenting after Separation"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 129: Line 129:
Courts have interpreted "regularly cares for" as meaning more than occasional visits.
Courts have interpreted "regularly cares for" as meaning more than occasional visits.


There is a case from the BC Court of Appeal, A.A.A.M. v. BC, 2015 BCCA 220, which found that when the Ministry of children and Family Development controled how often a parent could see his child, it was unfair to say that parent had not “regularly cared for” the child. The Court of Appeal in this case found that a parent’s intention to “regularly care for” a child who was in the care of the Ministry was enough to make that parent a guardian. http://www.canlii.org/en/bc/bcca/doc/2015/2015bcca220/2015bcca220.html?resultIndex=1
There is a case from the BC Court of Appeal, [http://canlii.ca/t/gj15z A.A.A.M. v. BC, 2015 BCCA 220], which found that when the Ministry of children and Family Development controled how often a parent could see his child, it was unfair to say that parent had not “regularly cared for” the child. The Court of Appeal in this case found that a parent’s intention to “regularly care for” a child who was in the care of the Ministry was enough to make that parent a guardian.


====Parental responsibilities====
====Parental responsibilities====

Navigation menu