Difference between revisions of "Protection Against Job Discrimination"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
Line 57: Line 57:
The employer’s duty to accommodate isn’t limitless. It extends only to the point where the accommodation starts causing the employer “'''undue hardship'''”.  
The employer’s duty to accommodate isn’t limitless. It extends only to the point where the accommodation starts causing the employer “'''undue hardship'''”.  


Many human rights cases involve complaints that an employer has not accommodated a worker’s disability. The ''Human Rights Code'' does not define disability. Cases have said a disability is involuntary, is somewhat permanent, and impairs a person's ability to carry out the normal functions of life. Accommodation requires an employer and a worker (and a worker’s union, if they are in one) to find a practical solution to accommodate the worker’s disability but not create an undue hardship on the employer. An employer may have to accept some hardship. That hardship might involve expense, inconvenience, or disruption — as long as it does not unduly interfere with the business.
Many human rights cases involve complaints that an employer has not accommodated a worker’s disability. The ''Human Rights Code'' does not define disability. Cases have said a disability is involuntary, is somewhat permanent, and impairs a person's ability to carry out the normal functions of life. Accommodation requires an employer and a worker (''and'' a worker’s union, if they are in one) to find a practical solution to accommodate the worker’s disability but not create an undue hardship on the employer. An employer may have to accept some hardship. That hardship might involve expense, inconvenience, or disruption — as long as it does not unduly interfere with the business.


===An exception for a “bona fide occupational requirement”===
===An exception for a “bona fide occupational requirement”===
3,009

edits

Navigation menu