1,399
edits
m (→Discourse*) |
|||
Line 10: | Line 10: | ||
Before we get into substantive immigration law, let us go over some differences in language in family and immigration law. Some of these differences are: | Before we get into substantive immigration law, let us go over some differences in language in family and immigration law. Some of these differences are: | ||
===Use of the term “Common Law” or “Spouse”=== | |||
''Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations'' use the term “Common-Law partner” and list the following definition: “common-law partner means, in relation to a person, an individual who is cohabiting with the person in a conjugal relationship, having so cohabited for a period of at least one year. (conjoint de fait)” | ''Immigration and Refugee Protection Regulations'' use the term “Common-Law partner” and list the following definition: “common-law partner means, in relation to a person, an individual who is cohabiting with the person in a conjugal relationship, having so cohabited for a period of at least one year. (conjoint de fait)” | ||
Line 25: | Line 25: | ||
This means that just because you qualify as a common law spouse for the purpose of immigration, does not mean that you will qualify as a spouse for the purpose of Family Law Act. | This means that just because you qualify as a common law spouse for the purpose of immigration, does not mean that you will qualify as a spouse for the purpose of Family Law Act. | ||
===Best Interest of the Child=== | |||
Section 37(1) ''Family Law Act'' (BC) states that best interest of the child is the only consideration when making decisions about guardianship, parenting arrangements, and contact with the child. | Section 37(1) ''Family Law Act'' (BC) states that best interest of the child is the only consideration when making decisions about guardianship, parenting arrangements, and contact with the child. |
edits