* '''Non-removal orders:''' Under section 64 of the Act, if there is a concern that a person may remove a child from British Columbia and is unlikely to return, a court may make an order that a person not remove a child from a specified geographical area. This can range from a city to the province of British Columbia, for example. This type of order does not apply when a guardian wishes to relocate with a child with notice to the other guardian.
* '''Exclusive occupation of the family residence:''' Under section 90, the court may make temporary orders, and grant one spouse exclusive occupancy of the family residence. This isn't a restraining order, and it does not prohibit the other party from entering the home, but the person with the exclusive occupation order is allowed to live there and the other person is not.
==Impact of family violence on spousal support==
Misconduct by a spouse, which may include family violence, is not generally considered to be relevant to the issue of spousal support. However, there are exceptions to this general rule.
Section 15.2(5) of the ''[[Divorce Act]]'' says the court "shall not take into consideration any misconduct of a spouse in relation to the marriage" when making an order for spousal support. However, there is a difference between misconduct itself and the consequences of misconduct. The Supreme Court of Canada confirmed this distinction in the case of ''[https://canlii.ca/t/1nmrd Leskun v Leskun]]'', 2006 SCC 25 when it said a court may not order spousal support to be paid solely because family violence has occurred, but the court may order spousal support to be paid if that family violence has negatively impacted a spouse’s ability to become self-sufficient.
Similarly, section 166 of the Family Law Act provides that in making an order for spousal support the court must not consider any misconduct of a spouse, except if the misconduct unreasonably causes, prolongs, or aggravates a spouse’s need for spousal support, or affects the ability of a spouse to pay spousal support.
Additionally, in circumstances where financial abuse has been present and has extended to a failure to provide financial disclosure that is necessary to determine a spouse’s income and resolve the issue of spousal support, it may be appropriate for income to be notionally attributed, or "imputed", to a spouse under s. 19(f) of the ''[[Child Support Guidelines]]''.
==Impact of family violence property division==