Difference between revisions of "Parents"

Jump to navigation Jump to search
1,002 bytes removed ,  22:48, 27 February 2020
staging>Jpboyd
staging>Jpboyd
Line 101: Line 101:
===Parenting children===
===Parenting children===


Under section 40(1) of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', only people who are the guardians of a child have ''parental responsibilities'' and ''parenting time'' in relation to that child. People who are not the guardians of a child may have ''contact'' with the child but do not have the right to participate in making decisions about the raising of the child or the right to get information from the important people involved in the child's life, such as doctors, teachers, counsellors, coaches, and so on.
Under section 40(1) of the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', only people who are the "guardians" of a child have ''parental responsibilities'' and ''parenting time'' with that child. People who are not the guardians of a child may have ''contact'' with the child, but do not have the right to participate in making decisions about the raising of the child or the right to get information from the important people involved in the child's life, such as doctors, teachers, counsellors, and coaches.


Under section 39, the people who are presumed to be the guardians of a child are:
Under section 39, the people who are presumed to be the ''guardians'' of a child are:


*the child's parents, as long as they lived together,
#the child's parents, as long as they lived together;
*a person who is a parent of a child under an assisted reproduction agreement, and
#a person who is a parent of a child under an assisted reproduction agreement; and,
*a parent who "regularly cares" for the child.
#a parent who "regularly cares" for the child.


In other words, if a couple has had a child but never lived together, the parent who does not live with the child is not presumed to be a guardian of the child unless they ''regularly care'' for the child.  
In other words, if a couple has had a child but never lived together, the parent who does not live with the child is not presumed to be a guardian of the child unless they ''regularly care'' for the child. (The curious thing about the way section 39 is written, is that ''neither'' parent is presumed to be a guardian if the parents didn't live together! This is not what government meant in drafting that part of the ''Family Law Act'', of course, and so far I'm not aware of any court decisions that have addressed the problem.)


A parent who isn't a guardian can become a guardian if the child's other guardians, who may be just the other parent, agree that the parent should be a guardian. If the parents can't agree on this, then the parent who isn't a guardian has three choices. They:
A parent who isn't a guardian can become a guardian if the child's other guardians agree that the parent should be a guardian. If the parents can't agree on this, then the parent who isn't a guardian has three choices. They can:


*must settle for having contact with the child and not being able to participate in parenting the child,
#settle for having contact with the child and not being able to participate in parenting the child;
*must prove that they ''regularly care'' for the child, in  <span class="noglossary">order</span> to be recognized as a guardian of the child who is entitled to participate in parenting the child, or
#try to prove that they ''regularly care'' for the child, in  <span class="noglossary">order</span> to be recognized as a guardian of the child who is entitled to participate in parenting the child; or,
*must apply to be appointed as the guardian of a child under section 51 of the ''Family Law Act''.
#can apply to be appointed as the guardian of a child under section 51 of the ''Family Law Act''.


Applications for appointment as guardian are difficult, as the person who is making the application must provide a special kind of affidavit that talks about the children who are and have been in the person's care, any civil or criminal court proceedings that might impact on the safety of a child, and any history of involvement with the Ministry for Children and Family Development. The person must also provide recent MCFD and police records checks. Applications for appointment as a guardian are discussed in more detail in the [[Guardianship,_Parenting_Arrangements_and_Contact|Guardianship, Parenting Arrangements and Contact]] section of the [[Children]] chapter, under the heading "[[Guardianship,_Parenting_Arrangements_and_Contact#Being_a_guardian_and_becoming_a_guardian|Being a guardian and becoming a guardian]]."
Applications for appointment as a guardian can be a bit difficult, as the applicant &mdash; the person who is making the application &mdash; must provide a special kind of affidavit that talks about all of the children who are and have been in the person's care, any civil or criminal court proceedings involving them that might impact on the safety of a child, and any involvement they might have had with the Ministry for Children and Family Development. The applicant must also provide recent Ministry and police records checks. Applications for appointment as a guardian are discussed in more detail in the [[Guardianship,_Parenting_Arrangements_and_Contact|Guardianship, Parenting Arrangements and Contact]] section of the [[Children]] chapter, under the heading "[[Guardianship,_Parenting_Arrangements_and_Contact#Being_a_guardian_and_becoming_a_guardian|Being a guardian and becoming a guardian]]."


==Government benefits==


 
The most important thing to know about government benefits is that most federal legislation defines a ''spouse'' as someone who has been in a cohabiting relationship for at least one year, as opposed to British Columbia's legislation which generally requires a two-year cohabiting relationship to qualify. As a result, someone in a relationship of at least one year may qualify for any federal benefits that depend on a spousal relationship, although they probably won't qualify for provincial benefits. People in a relationship of less than one year won't usually qualify for any spousal benefits at all.
 
===Agreements available to unmarried couples===
 
A family law agreement is a contract between two or more people that is enforceable by the courts, just like any other kind of contract. People can make any kind of contract they want, as long as the contract isn't made for an illegal purpose and doesn't require a person to do something illegal. There's no reason, for example, why two people couldn't make a contract requiring one of them to wear purple shirts on Thursdays in exchange for a box of ants. Although it's hard to imagine why anyone would want such a contract, it's still possible and it would be enforceable in court provided that the agreement was properly written out and signed.
 
This section has just gone through the sorts of orders unmarried couples can ask for under the ''Family Law Act''. Essentially, we're talking about orders about the care of children and the payment of child support. If an unmarried couple was going to have an agreement, it would probably talk about these two issues. However, like the contract about shirts and ants, there's no reason why an unmarried couple couldn't make an agreement that also talked about the payment of spousal support and the division of family property and family debt. Although the couple are under no legal obligation to make a contract about these things, they can do so if they want.
 
===Government benefits===
 
The most important thing to know about government benefits is that most federal legislation defines a ''spouse'' as someone who has been in a cohabiting relationship for at least one year, as opposed to British Columbia's legislation which generally requires a two-year cohabiting relationship to qualify. As a result, someone in a relationship of at least one year may qualify for any federal benefits that depend on a spousal relationship, although they probably won't qualify for provincial benefits. People in a relationship of less than one year will not usually qualify for any benefits at all.


Benefits relating to children, like the [https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/family-social-supports/family-benefits provincial supports], the [https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/child-family-benefits/canada-child-benefit-overview.html#nt Canada Child Benefit], and the [http://www.nationalchildbenefit.ca/eng/home.shtml National Child Benefit Supplement] are available to anyone who is a parent, regardless of the nature of that person's relationship with the other parent. The website of the [http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/menu-eng.html Canada Revenue Agency] has a lot of information about federal and provincial benefits.
Benefits relating to children, like the [https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/family-social-supports/family-benefits provincial supports], the [https://www.canada.ca/en/revenue-agency/services/child-family-benefits/canada-child-benefit-overview.html#nt Canada Child Benefit], and the [http://www.nationalchildbenefit.ca/eng/home.shtml National Child Benefit Supplement] are available to anyone who is a parent, regardless of the nature of that person's relationship with the other parent. The website of the [http://www.cra-arc.gc.ca/menu-eng.html Canada Revenue Agency] has a lot of information about federal and provincial benefits.
Anonymous user

Navigation menu