7,759
edits
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) |
Nate Russell (talk | contribs) |
||
Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
}} | }} | ||
The ''disclosure and discovery'' process is all about learning — or "discovering" — the other party's case. It | The ''disclosure and discovery'' process is all about learning — or "discovering" — the other party's case. It involves exchanging relevant information and documents with the other party, organizing the documents, evaluating the strengths and weaknesses of all the parties' evidence before trial, and hopefully reducing the number of facts that you and the other party disagree about so that everyone can focus their efforts and be more efficient with their time if a trial does need to happen. | ||
By going through the disclosure and discovery process, you might discover that your case is stronger or weaker than you first thought, and so will the other side. You will have a better understanding of your chances of success, and be in a better position to either propose a settlement or respond to any settlement offers from the other party. | |||
As you begin the process, it's wise to consult a lawyer who can advise you on what must be disclosed to the other party, what you need to prove in court for your case to succeed, and what information to look for in the other party's case. A growing number of lawyers offer what's called ''unbundled'' legal services, which means they will take on certain tasks, but not all. If you want unbundled legal help to fit your budget, see the People's Law School website for [https://unbundlinglaw.peopleslawschool.ca/ Unbundled Legal Services]. If your household income meets the [https://legalaid.bc.ca/services/do-i-qualify-advice eligibility criteria], you can also [https://legalaid.bc.ca/services/family-law-legal-advice ask a duty counsel or call the Family LawLINE service] who may provide some free legal advice. | |||
==Introduction== | ==Introduction== | ||
In Canada, we don't litigate with cards up our sleeves. Instead, | In Canada, we don't litigate with cards up our sleeves. Instead, everyone's cards are on the table, face up. This may not make a lot of sense right away, partly because of what we see in American movies and televisions shows, but the point is that the courts want to give each party the best possible chance of settling without having to go through a trial. The only fair way to do this is to ensure parties show what cards they are holding early on. As Justice Punnett said, in the 2013 BC Supreme Court case of ''[https://canlii.ca/t/fzqb3 J.D.G. v J.J.V.]'', 2013 BCSC 1274, "the goal of proper disclosure is to enable the parties to resolve their dispute." Justice Fraser was even more blunt, in his 1994 decision in a BC Supreme Court case called ''[https://canlii.ca/t/1dn7f Cunha v Cunha]'', 1994 CanLII 3195 (BC SC): | ||
<blockquote>"Non-disclosure of assets is the cancer of matrimonial property litigation. It discourages settlement or promotes settlements which are inadequate. It increases the time and expense of litigation. The prolonged stress of unnecessary battle may lead weary and drained [parties] simply to give up and walk away with only a share of the assets they know about, taking with them the bitter aftertaste of a reasonably-based suspicion that justice was not done."</blockquote> | <blockquote>"Non-disclosure of assets is the cancer of matrimonial property litigation. It discourages settlement or promotes settlements which are inadequate. It increases the time and expense of litigation. The prolonged stress of unnecessary battle may lead weary and drained [parties] simply to give up and walk away with only a share of the assets they know about, taking with them the bitter aftertaste of a reasonably-based suspicion that justice was not done."</blockquote> | ||
Providing relevant information in advance of trial makes it possible to settle a dispute without appearing in court. Hearings and trials are expensive, and not just for the parties. The government and | Providing relevant information in advance of trial makes it possible to settle a dispute without appearing in court. Hearings and trials are expensive, and not just for the parties. The government and the courts are interested in encouraging settlement and reducing the administrative burden of holding hearings and trials for every family law dispute. The better each party understands both their own case's strengths and weaknesses, ''and'' the other party's, the more likely they are to reach a reasonable compromise. The law makers and the court administration know this. | ||
As a result, the | As a result, the legislation and regulations — notably the Supreme Court Family Rules, ''[[Family Law Act]]'', ''[[Divorce Act]]'', and [[Child Support Guidelines]] — are full of mechanisms intended to speed up the disclosure and discovery process. A lot of the document disclosure rules apply automatically, and the court forms you must complete will include, or at least list, essential documents and evidence. When you need to dive deeper, the Supreme Court Family Rules set further procedures for demanding more documents and pre-trial discovery. You'll also learn about these in this section of the chapter. | ||
Disclosure and discovery is a critical stage of the litigation process that the BC Supreme Court takes very, very seriously. This is why there are so many rules around it. In this section we will use the term "disclosure" to refer generally to the process of ''disclosure and discovery'', although simply speaking "disclosure" is the process of revealing your own relevant documents, while "discovery" is more associated with investigating and obtaining evidence from the other side. | Disclosure and discovery is a critical stage of the litigation process that the BC Supreme Court takes very, very seriously. This is why there are so many rules around it. In this section we will use the term "disclosure" to refer generally to the process of ''disclosure and discovery'', although simply speaking "disclosure" is the process of revealing your own relevant documents, while "discovery" is more associated with investigating and obtaining evidence from the other side. | ||
Line 23: | Line 23: | ||
In this section we will discuss: | In this section we will discuss: | ||
# | # Document disclosure laws — what the Supreme Court Family Rules and legislation tell you about what documents you and the other party must automatically provide, and the conditions and consequences imposed on parties. | ||
# | # Court forms for disclosure — what forms you need to prepare to comply with the automatic document disclosure requirements, and how to complete them and keep them current. | ||
# Pre-trial discovery | # Pre-trial discovery — what pre-trial procedures are available for cross-examination of another party or a witness, obtaining answers to questions or more disclosure, and getting admissions from the other party to ensure an efficient trial, or better yet encourage settlement. | ||
==Laws for disclosure in BC Supreme Court== | ==Laws for disclosure in BC Supreme Court== | ||
The Supreme Court Family Rules are extremely important for litigants. Key provisions in other legislation and regulations, notably the ''[[Family Law Act]]'', ''[[Divorce Act]]'', and the Child Support Guidelines, are also important because they add specific document disclosure requirements, allow judges to impose penalties for non-compliance, and reinforce confidentiality so that parties can safely share sensitive information with less fear that it will be used for inappropriate purposes or shared with others who are not involved in the litigation. | |||
===The Supreme Court Family Rules=== | ===The Supreme Court Family Rules=== | ||
The [https://canlii.ca/t/8mcr Supreme Court Family Rules], BC Reg 169/2009, is a regulation under the ''[https://canlii.ca/t/84h8 Court Rules Act]'', RSBC 1996, c 80, which is the source of authority for the various rules applied in BC's courts. The practices and procedures within the Supreme Court Family Rules apply to family law cases in BC Supreme Court. The Supreme Court Family Rules is divided into Parts, and a couple of these are especially relevant to disclosure and discovery: | |||
* Part 5 — Financial Statements | |||
* Part 9 — Procedures for Obtaining Information and Documents | |||
Before looking at these Parts and the specific disclosure rules, it's worth noting the objectives of the BC Supreme Court Family Rules. Rule 1-3, is titled "Object of Rules". If you read this rule, you will learn that: | |||
* The court wants to help parties resolve the legal issues in their case fairly. | |||
* The court wants to reduce the negative impact that litigation has on children. | |||
* The court wants to help parties minimize conflict and promote cooperation. | |||
* The court wants family law cases to be determined on their merits, but in a just, speedy, and inexpensive manner. | |||
You might be surprised to learn that the court's objective is ''not'' to hold trials and have judges read absolutely every scrap of evidence, even though more evidence must be better for determining the "merits" of a case. In fact, judge-imposed outcomes, lengthy trials, and cases with lots and lots of evidence actually go against the core objectives of the Supreme Court Family Rules: | |||
* If a judge renders a decision, even if it's a fair one, it means the parties have failed to resolve their own legal issues — and a fair settlement is better than a fair decision from a judge | |||
* If the parties are in trial, it means the children have undergone a longer period of stress while waiting for the litigation to conclude — and a timely settlement is better for children than a long, drawn-out trial. | |||
* If the parties are arguing in court, they are in probably high in conflict and low in cooperation — whereas parties who separate but are still able to negotiate reasonable compromises are going to find it easier and less stressful to move forward as co-parents. | |||
* If every legal issue is being argued at trial, no matter how minor, and every fact is being disputed with lengthy and redundant evidence, then even if the ''merits'' of each party's case is being painstakingly revealed, clearly there is something wrong, slow, and expensive about the process — and unless the case is very complicated, the parties are very wealthy, and there is something much larger at stake, then there should be a method for resolving the dispute that is more proportionate. | |||
The part about resolving cases in a "just, speedy, and inexpensive" manner, raises an important principle, namely ''proportionality'', and Rule 1-3(2) explains this: | |||
<blockquote><tt>Proportionality</tt></blockquote> | |||
<blockquote><blockquote><tt>(2)Securing the just, speedy and inexpensive determination of a family law case on its merits includes, so far as is practicable, conducting the family law case in ways that are proportionate to</tt></blockquote></blockquote> | |||
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(a)the interests of any child affected,</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> | |||
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(b)the importance of the issues in dispute,</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> | |||
<blockquote><blockquote><blockquote><tt>(c)the complexity of the family law case.</tt></blockquote></blockquote></blockquote> | |||
What you can take from this, in terms of the disclosure and discovery process, is that while complete disclosure is important under the Supreme Court Family Rules, you should keep in mind that the courts expect parties to be reasonable with what documents they produce or ask for, avoid unnecessary conflict, and keep the idea of proportionality in mind. | |||
There are some critical rules in the Supreme Court Family Rules to know about right away. Everything in Part 5 of the rules is essential for understanding financial disclosure, while Rule 9-1 is essential because it explains procedures for disclosing and inspecting documents. These rules are important because: | There are some critical rules in the Supreme Court Family Rules to know about right away. Everything in Part 5 of the rules is essential for understanding financial disclosure, while Rule 9-1 is essential because it explains procedures for disclosing and inspecting documents. These rules are important because: | ||
# they apply early on in the litigation process, and | # they apply early on in the litigation process, and | ||
# they impose automatic obligations that are triggered when a party decides to defend against a party's claims. | # they impose automatic obligations that are triggered when a party decides to defend against a party's claims. | ||
We mention Rule 9-1 in particular, not because the rest of the rules in Part 9 are not important, but because Rule 9-1 comes into play right away and | We mention Rule 9-1 in particular, not because the rest of the rules in Part 9 are not important, but because Rule 9-1 comes into play right away and is not dependent on the decisions or trial strategy of either party. The other procedures in Part 9 are discussed further below, under the "Pre-trial discovery" heading. | ||
====Rule 5-1 - Financial Statements==== | ====Rule 5-1 - Financial Statements==== |